sglowrider
Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
We almost had that in 2015-16 isn't it, Champions league kit.
If you poked your eyes a bit then it looks a bit more orangy.
We almost had that in 2015-16 isn't it, Champions league kit.
If you poked your eyes a bit then it looks a bit more orangy.
Fair enough. I think Ole and Ragnick were wrong not to use him and I think he'll do well under Ten Hag. If he does then we can put his first 2 years down to manager misuse and not the player himself.The difference is there is no way in hell two managers would not have seen the quality of David Silva, one of the best players to grace the PL. That requires a massive stretch of the imagination.
At the moment VDB can hide behind all of these managers being unsuccessful, or at least that seems to be the argument (even though he is the common denominator, we seem quick to blame managers rather than player responsibility). He did have an injury hit period at Everton, but he wasn't fantastic there either, would they be knocking the door down to buy him? Sometimes he was even left on the Everton bench.
He's been poor in England, everything from getting himself in a team to performing when he has been given minutes. Now the question is has he got a lifeline? ETH was probably the only thing that could have happened to think that might be the case.
This kind of thinking is basically why we’re where we are now. Anyone with eyes can see tactics and systems are everything in modern football - there’s so much money floating around you can’t just buy the best players and trust they’ll come out on top.What is this system stuff all about? I can't see any great meaning in it.
Isn't a top player good in a system anyway? I can't think of any good player that isn't good in one, it's a prerequisite, this is football we're talking about not freestyling - they all go into systems so what distinguishes VDB except that we need to line up an explanation for his performances?
Is it to be translated to mean pretty mediocre but if you surround X player by quality players he might look better? That doesn't seem right as it applies to any player. Or does it mean this player is not adaptable at all and can only play if everything is setup for him? Which also means all the other players have to be setup for him, if the concept is taken to its logical conclusion.
Nope, I think you have to be of a certain calibre to begin with and then hopefully you can play in the manager's system. Of course you start by buying suitable players but we seem to be absolving players of all responsibility to use their brain and adapt and if they don't there are "systems" or it's the manager's fault. How do we even know that the "system" is decisive? He was good at Ajax (by all accounts), poor for us and mediocre for Everton so is it a system or a specific club or league or both?
Rumor has it that Donny has so much potential and is so valuable and necessary that we've gone so far as to bring in 10 Hag to accommodate him.He's done the square root of f*ck-all and he still appears in fans line-ups for next season.
This kind of thinking is basically why we’re where we are now. Anyone with eyes can see tactics and systems are everything in modern football - there’s so much money floating around you can’t just buy the best players and trust they’ll come out on top.
Put peak Xavi in a non possession based, long ball team and he’d probably be benched, put him at CM in a possession heavy system and he’s probably the best to ever do it. Every single player will have strengths and weaknesses, some fit certain systems much better than others.
The less you appear, the less chance of disappointing people.He's done the square root of f*ck-all and he still appears in fans line-ups for next season.
You're massively stretching it by using this Xavi example. Most top division sides don't even play long ball football by old standards so it's already starting off on a bad footing as it's hard to apply this analogy in any meaningful way. Theoretically you may be right, but to go down that road is so far removed what's the point? Even Burnley play a reasonable amount of football through midfield these days, I don't believe thinking about Xavi in Wimbledon circa 1990 will be instructive.This kind of thinking is basically why we’re where we are now. Anyone with eyes can see tactics and systems are everything in modern football - there’s so much money floating around you can’t just buy the best players and trust they’ll come out on top.
Put peak Xavi in a non possession based, long ball team and he’d probably be benched, put him at CM in a possession heavy system and he’s probably the best to ever do it. Every single player will have strengths and weaknesses, some fit certain systems much better than others.
It’s just an example given he’s a very specific system player. If you want to be pedantic it’s very easy to adapt it to fit modern football - Xavi at Chelsea or City would be world class, at Pool be amazing albeit they are a lot more unstructured than the above two teams, for United last season he’d be terrible.You're massively stretching it by using this Xavi example. Most top division sides don't even play long ball football by old standards so it's already starting off on a bad footing as it's hard to apply this analogy in any meaningful way. Theoretically you may be right, but to go down that road is so far removed what's the point? Even Burnley play a reasonable amount of football through midfield these days, I don't believe thinking about Xavi in Wimbledon circa 1990 will be instructive.
This leads me to think there isn't a team around Xavi wouldn't be a fantastic player in within modern football precisely for this reason, football has evolved such that even if he was at a shite team he would have stood out and been bought. He was quality firstly because he was quality, and then he had a suited team that emphasized the point and allowed him to become a legend.
So it's not my point that a system can never be advantageous, my point is why do we look so hard for excuses that are hard to support? The fact he has shown very little for us, Everton and even internationally is quite clear, whereas his success is largely in Dutch domestic football. The easiest explanation is simply that his quality and transition hasn't been good, not this vague assertion about systems that is based on one club. There's not even more than one data point. It's grasping at straws, but at least there's one more to grasp at with ETH coming in.
Happens a lot in our fan base in the post-SAF era:He's done the square root of f*ck-all and he still appears in fans line-ups for next season.
Doesn't make sense as a starter given we have Bruno, but there is valid reason to have hope for him, given that Ten Hag liked him a lot (and he might facilitate implementing Ten Hag's style quicker than others). I still don't see him as more than a squad player though.He's done the square root of f*ck-all and he still appears in fans line-ups for next season.
Fair enough. I think Ole and Rangnick were wrong not to use him and I think he'll do well under Ten Hag. If he does then we can put his first 2 years down to manager misuse and not the player himself.
I'll say it again. He's played 4 full league games in 2 years.So, Donny has no responsibility for his own performances, his own anonymity when picked? £40 Million transfer, £6 Milllion a year as wages, couldn't make a case to get ahead of Fred and McTominay, the fans choice for our worst midfield in the modern era, and we are supposed to feel he has been mistreated.
Managers fault, not his, is this attitude not the one Utd have to stamp out if they want to get back to challenging? He hasn't been good enough, he hasn't earned anything at Utd.
I'll say it again. He's played 4 full league games in 2 years.
If the manager doesn't give you a fair chance then yes, you can blame the manager. No player can be expected to show what he can do in the tiny amount of time Donny has been given.
Like I said, I hope this manager gives him a chance and then we'll see where we are.
Be looks very limited, like Lingard without the distant shooting and ball carrying, all he has going for him is the running into space thing.No player can expect to get a "fair chance" if they do as little as Donny did in the opportunities he got. If a youth player had received the same chances as Donny, performed as he did, no-one would argue about that player being put back into the under-age squad. His performances were bang average at Utd and bang average at Everton with mediocre competition for places at both teams.
No hiding place now.
That's where we disagree. I saw more to work with from him in those performances than I ever saw from Mctominay. Unfortunately Ole didn't. Let's see how he gets on nowNo player can expect to get a "fair chance" if they do as little as Donny did in the opportunities he got. If a youth player had received the same chances as Donny, performed as he did, no-one would argue about that player being put back into the under-age squad. His performances were bang average at Utd and bang average at Everton with mediocre competition for places at both teams.
No hiding place now.
VDB did have a period right at the end of his first season and then the first couple of months of the second season where he was actually starting to show some good stuff in the few opportunities that he got. He seemed more aggressive, was trying to make things happen, and while there were still definite question marks over him he did deserve more chances considering our other options were all playing terribly at the time. Ole instead insisted on continuing with what wasn't working.No player can expect to get a "fair chance" if they do as little as Donny did in the opportunities he got. If a youth player had received the same chances as Donny, performed as he did, no-one would argue about that player being put back into the under-age squad. His performances were bang average at Utd and bang average at Everton with mediocre competition for places at both teams.
No hiding place now.
That's already better than Fred and MctominayRuns around a good amount and is ok at popping the ball off to the nearest player to him. Hasn't showed anything like enough when given the chance. Can't imagine we'll see huge amounts more next season.
I don't agree that it makes him better than Fred and, regardless, surely we should be aiming higher?That's already better than Fred and Mctominay
Runs around a good amount and is ok at popping the ball off to the nearest player to him.
As a United fan, you ought to know that not all new signings are successfulthis thread was on fire blaming ole for this and now excuses have been removed for donny it is deathly silence? surely he should be like a new signing under his absolute ideal manager?
I appreciate that. But almost until the day ETH was announced the fans were optimistic about Donny. Now it is like he doesn't existAs a United fan, you ought to know that not all new signings are successful
this thread was on fire blaming ole for this and now excuses have been removed for donny it is deathly silence? surely he should be like a new signing under his absolute ideal manager?
i take your point - i just wasnt sure where else to post this puzzling question. kinda speaks to my point that there are no other threads about him. nobody is interested in him anymore, he was a useful tool to berate ole and seems to have served his purpose now. none of us know anything for sure but it doesn't stop people starting threads about whether jones could hypothetically be better than maguire if he wasn't injured for 10 years.Not sure why you expect a player performances thread to be active in the absence of any, you know, performances?
I for one am hopeful that ETH will get a much better tune out of VDB than either Ole or Fat Fwank but none of us will know for sure until after he plays a few games for the new manager.
i take your point - i just wasnt sure where else to post this puzzling question. kinda speaks to my point that there are no other threads about him. nobody is interested in him anymore, he was a useful tool to berate ole and seems to have served his purpose now. none of us know anything for sure but it doesn't stop people starting threads about whether jones could hypothetically be better than maguire if he wasn't injured for 10 years.
True.I appreciate that. But almost until the day ETH was announced the fans were optimistic about Donny. Now it is like he doesn't exist
I appreciate that. But almost until the day ETH was announced the fans were optimistic about Donny. Now it is like he doesn't exist
Think he’ll get a good chance but will eventually show that he’s a bit shite under any manager.
mctominay thread is hopping with speculation of how he will play under ETH. nobody cares enough about donny to even bother here.Well all of us donny fans are hopeful and do think he will flourish. This just isn't the right thread