Siorac
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 23,966
Ten times zero is still zero though so that's harsh on Donny.He's ten times the footballer McT is
Ten times zero is still zero though so that's harsh on Donny.He's ten times the footballer McT is
I just watched the game again and honestly some of his play was brilliant. There was a pass to Ronaldo I missed yesterday where he recieves the ball is holding it waiting for a runner, asking for someone and then eventually Ronaldo obliges and unfortunately wasn’t his usual composed self when it comes to finishing.
Linked up really well with Sancho and more so he came on with purpose and played with intensity. In the build up to his goal he was back defending and the team actually played out from the back pretty well which he was involved in then a bit of possesion in midfield, then scores. That whole passage of play was decent and what the team should be about. He really needs to be a part of the squad going forward.
He has put in big crunching tackles against West Ham and yesterday against Watford in basically his only 2 appearances. It can take time to settle in to a new league which you cant do from the bench.He’s not a bad player, and he hasn’t been given many opportunities, but the clamour for him to play and subsequent overreaction to a few good passes is a bit much.
He played like a complete fanny in most games he got onto the field last season, so he’s as much to blame for his plight as anyone. Some of you won’t like this but it’s true. I know it’s true because I used to try and convince myself about the value of Mkhitaryan and Kagawa in the same way. The truth is that they were fannies who weren’t up to the job. Van de Beek is more or less the same.
He has put in big crunching tackles against West Ham and yesterday against Watford in basically his only 2 appearances. It can take time to settle in to a new league which you cant do from the bench.
He has played about 90 minutes in total and we're nearly in December. Highlighting a few new passes and tackles in 90 minutes I dont think is holding him to less standards than Bruno!But we’re praising him for putting in a couple of tackles. It’s a bit flimsy.
Fernandes, who is actually a proper player, is coming in for all sorts of pelters and this is after eighteen months in which he’s scored or assisted in more or less every single game. What standards are we setting for Van de Beek then?
He’s not a bad player, and he hasn’t been given many opportunities, but the clamour for him to play and subsequent overreaction to a few good passes is a bit much.
He played like a complete fanny in most games he got onto the field last season, so he’s as much to blame for his plight as anyone. Some of you won’t like this but it’s true. I know it’s true because I used to try and convince myself about the value of Mkhitaryan and Kagawa in the same way. The truth is that they were fannies who weren’t up to the job. Van de Beek is more or less the same.
I agree, had pointed out that he played as many creative passes in that half yesterday as he did in the whole of last season in the league. Yes, he had a lot of short cameos with the odd start but he was not making much of any impact as a sub, it was all short safe passes back to the player he got it from and then moving into a spot that was hard to find.
Yesterday and against Atalanta he came on and looked as if he could make something happen, last year he was a wasted sub, now if he doesn't get an opportunity there are grounds for complaint.
He’s not a bad player, and he hasn’t been given many opportunities, but the clamour for him to play and subsequent overreaction to a few good passes is a bit much.
He played like a complete fanny in most games he got onto the field last season, so he’s as much to blame for his plight as anyone. Some of you won’t like this but it’s true. I know it’s true because I used to try and convince myself about the value of Mkhitaryan and Kagawa in the same way. The truth is that they were fannies who weren’t up to the job. Van de Beek is more or less the same.
Don’t agree with this at all. I remember coming on here after a Liverpool game thinking he had a good game but the CAF was outraged at his performance . When most of it was due to a lack of players finding him in the fantastic positions he was taking up or the options he was giving them.. He does not hide. Simply we just don’t play in a manner that got the best out of him. Yesterday for a brief spell we did, hence you see what he used to do for the likes of Ajax and the Netherlands.I agree, had pointed out that he played as many creative passes in that half yesterday as he did in the whole of last season in the league. Yes, he had a lot of short cameos with the odd start but he was not making much of any impact as a sub, it was all short safe passes back to the player he got it from and then moving into a spot that was hard to find.
Yesterday and against Atalanta he came on and looked as if he could make something happen, last year he was a wasted sub, now if he doesn't get an opportunity there are grounds for complaint.
He’s not a bad player, and he hasn’t been given many opportunities, but the clamour for him to play and subsequent overreaction to a few good passes is a bit much.
He played like a complete fanny in most games he got onto the field last season, so he’s as much to blame for his plight as anyone. Some of you won’t like this but it’s true. I know it’s true because I used to try and convince myself about the value of Mkhitaryan and Kagawa in the same way. The truth is that they were fannies who weren’t up to the job. Van de Beek is more or less the same.
Plenty of players failed to shine under Mourinho and his strict instructions, including maybe the best two players in the world right now. Ole may not have let him play the way he wanted. I won't be surprised if he looks like a new man.He’s not a bad player, and he hasn’t been given many opportunities, but the clamour for him to play and subsequent overreaction to a few good passes is a bit much.
He played like a complete fanny in most games he got onto the field last season, so he’s as much to blame for his plight as anyone. Some of you won’t like this but it’s true. I know it’s true because I used to try and convince myself about the value of Mkhitaryan and Kagawa in the same way. The truth is that they were fannies who weren’t up to the job. Van de Beek is more or less the same.
"Few good passes" - you mean a goal, 3 key passes and good defensive work and build up play?He’s not a bad player, and he hasn’t been given many opportunities, but the clamour for him to play and subsequent overreaction to a few good passes is a bit much.
He played like a complete fanny in most games he got onto the field last season, so he’s as much to blame for his plight as anyone. Some of you won’t like this but it’s true. I know it’s true because I used to try and convince myself about the value of Mkhitaryan and Kagawa in the same way. The truth is that they were fannies who weren’t up to the job. Van de Beek is more or less the same.
I think we're all so desperate for a good midfielder that we jump on the first train that arrives.
I think his performance was great but let's see if he can be consistently good first before raving wildly about him.
He has a long way to go yet to prove himself worthy.
There was one simple moment in the game that stuck out and it's not what you'd think it is, but it underscores the nuance of what he can provide in the middle.
At 1:57 on this video, Sancho is a few yards away from him with two or three Watford players closing around. Now, if it were Fred or McTominay, they'd pass it short to Sancho and then drift back a couple of yards for the return ball, but in this instance, Donny delays the pass long enough for Sancho to run on the outside; Donny slips the ball angled on the inside of the Watford player right into Sancho's run.
It's the kind of pass where you say, "yeah, well all midfielders do that", but it's so rare that Fred or McTominay even have the composure, let alone the speed of thought to play through a press like that.
If people are expecting a goal and 3 key passes in each half of football they're gonna be very dissapointed. Like you said, he just doesn't warrant freezing out when his competition is McFred in shite form.Yeah but what's wrong with that? Even if he's a bang average premier league midfielder it's shocking he was getting no game time compared to what McFred has been serving us.
Agree. However he has never been given a consistent run of games. Who's to say he cannot be even better when he finds his rhythmI think we're all so desperate for a good midfielder that we jump on the first train that arrives.
I think his performance was great but let's see if he can be consistently good first before raving wildly about him.
He has a long way to go yet to prove himself worthy.
If people are expecting a goal and 3 key passes in each half of football they're gonna be very dissapointed. Like you said, he just doesn't warrant freezing out when his competition is McFred in shite form.
If people are expecting a goal and 3 key passes in each half of football they're gonna be very dissapointed. Like you said, he just doesn't warrant freezing out when his competition is McFred in shite form.
If VDB gets more starts then it will mean OGS had a seriously personal problem with him
If VDB gets more starts then it will mean OGS had a seriously personal problem with him
The passes were great and something that is so badly needed but it was good to see him hold off multiple challenges too. The narrative (that I bought into too) that he's very lightweight looks false.
Carrick would have enjoyed those through balls yesterday. I predict he plays the next game!I think carrick will play him
From who?Will carrick actually be taking calls on who starts ?
There was one simple moment in the game that stuck out and it's not what you'd think it is, but it underscores the nuance of what he can provide in the middle.
At 1:57 on this video, Sancho is a few yards away from him with two or three Watford players closing around. Now, if it were Fred or McTominay, they'd pass it short to Sancho and then drift back a couple of yards for the return ball, but in this instance, Donny delays the pass long enough for Sancho to run on the outside; Donny slips the ball angled on the inside of the Watford player right into Sancho's run.
It's the kind of pass where you say, "yeah, well all midfielders do that", but it's so rare that Fred or McTominay even have the composure, let alone the speed of thought to play through a press like that.
He is not a bad player, just that our other options, McFred is fecking piece of total shite, while Pogba is biggest lazy wanker around. So it’s easily better to play him ahead of those clowns.He’s not a bad player, and he hasn’t been given many opportunities, but the clamour for him to play and subsequent overreaction to a few good passes is a bit much.
He played like a complete fanny in most games he got onto the field last season, so he’s as much to blame for his plight as anyone. Some of you won’t like this but it’s true. I know it’s true because I used to try and convince myself about the value of Mkhitaryan and Kagawa in the same way. The truth is that they were fannies who weren’t up to the job. Van de Beek is more or less the same.