Yes I thought that might be the case, you could be bemused, but you appear to be fluent in defining stupidity?
I give my opinions only and at my age that's about all I can do, its based on my lifetime experiences and Donald Rumsfeld's 'known v unknowns' thing; when you reach my age you will probably see life a lot different from what you do now... if you don't mind me asking, how old are you by the way?
With respect, you really need to keep up with my posts.
I have explained this point previously, its part of the 'taboo' of not going after former (not sitting) Presidents. If such information was made public it would be devastating, as is likely to be the case down the road with the current Trump saga, in particular the incitement to rebellion.
To avoid such problems the Romans had a similar 'taboo' for ex- Generals who failed in battle, instead of putting them on trial, they where allowed to take early retirement and were allowed to return to their estates quietly and to live out the rest of their lives in peace, as long as they kept quiet and promised not to lead any rebellions. This (6th Jan) is probably the most devastating charge against Trump, at least in terms the security of the nation, it could go either way, because no one in their right mind can expect Trump to stay quiet...on anything!
See my reply above
6th Jan/ previous former Presidents ... see my response above(Rob)