Do we really need a new CB, if so who?

I see zero indication we are looking for another CB. Bailly looks very promising and I expect will be able to establish himself as first choice alongside Smalling fairly quickly.

I don't think we will be in the market for another CB this Summer. We will be down the line though, As Jose will start to see the liability that Jones is, if he hasn't started to see it already.
 
So you just conveniently take the salary for all five years, and add them as a financial burden for one single year?

Seems legit. You should try out at McKinsey.

Very obviously, it's not a burden borne by income from single year ... it's just a waste of time to pretend I've said otherwise. But it is a stark illustration of the size of current and future spending commitments that United seem bent on taking on with Pogba. And it needs to be considered in aggregate with all the other current and future payments (fee instalments + wages) that United are already committed to.

So many United fans seem to think that your money is endless. But it won't be too long now before the chickens come home to roost.
 
Excluding the Right back position which I believe we also need a first teamer for that, the first team defense look fine. Bailly is an excellent CB and so is Smalling. Shaw is an excellent LB well. The problem isn't with first teamers but with our lack of quality strength in depth. If any of those defenders get injured we would have to rely on defenders such as Mcnair, Rojo and Jones. Those are simply not good enough.

This is the top and tits of it, our starting pairing is fine, it's the two turds that are the primary cover that is the big concern.
 
I don't think we will be in the market for another CB this Summer. We will be down the line though, As Jose will start to see the liability that Jones is, if he hasn't started to see it already.

Hopefully Mourinho continues to rate Tuanzebe and gives him time. Blind and Tuanzebe as back-ups would be fine, if Mourinho manages to keep our first choice centre-backs fit. Preferably we bring someone in, if we sell Rojo and Jones though.
 
Very obviously, it's not a burden borne by income from single year ... it's just a waste of time to pretend I've said otherwise. But it is a stark illustration of the size of current and future spending commitments that United seem bent on taking on with Pogba. And it needs to be considered in aggregate with all the other current and future payments (fee instalments + wages) that United are already committed to.

So many United fans seem to think that your money is endless. But it won't be too long now before the chickens come home to roost.

I bet you're fun on a night out...

Down the line if we continue to not make the Champions League and the sponsorship deals dry up then yes I agree we will get to the point where we cannot spend lots, but right now we can afford it so we do right in trying to buy the players who will get us back to the top. If you are talking about business sense then signing Zlatan and Pogba alone make a lot of sense, the club will make that money back in marketing and shirt sales alone. Pogba also has a huge deal with Adidas what will also help our standing with them.
 
Very obviously, it's not a burden borne by income from single year ... it's just a waste of time to pretend I've said otherwise. But it is a stark illustration of the size of current and future spending commitments that United seem bent on taking on with Pogba. And it needs to be considered in aggregate with all the other current and future payments (fee instalments + wages) that United are already committed to.

So many United fans seem to think that your money is endless. But it won't be too long now before the chickens come home to roost.

So how come we have managed to decrease our debt while heavily spending on players the last years? Since we are in such financial turmoil and everything.

We know that the money isn't endless. But the brand and marketing abillity taking as heavy a hit as another 5-10 barren years would cause just isn't feasible. I am certain that the hordes of Goldman Sachs level economists and commercial guys we have on board got our financials more under control than a random guy called GlastonSpur from the internets.

Are you born on a poultry farm btw? You do love that analogy.

But please, I do quite a lot of work with finance and budgets, if you want to you can present your forecasts and calculations of this mysterious future where the chickens will come home to roost, and we can take it from there.

And please, actual numbers,Not just "yeah, cuz when you never again qualify for teh CL and Adidas ditches you the chickens will roost, fo'sho, lolz. Also the 4,3 billion you are going to pay in future installmens which I have no way of knowing anything about will certainly wreck you!"
 
Hopefully Mourinho continues to rate Tuanzebe and gives him time. Blind and Tuanzebe as back-ups would be fine, if Mourinho manages to keep our first choice centre-backs fit. Preferably we bring someone in, if we sell Rojo and Jones though.

Agree. Don't forget TFM to, I'd still prefer to see him at CB or DM (although that is more risky).
 
Very obviously, it's not a burden borne by income from single year ... it's just a waste of time to pretend I've said otherwise. But it is a stark illustration of the size of current and future spending commitments that United seem bent on taking on with Pogba. And it needs to be considered in aggregate with all the other current and future payments (fee instalments + wages) that United are already committed to.

So many United fans seem to think that your money is endless. But it won't be too long now before the chickens come home to roost.
If you believe that you'll believe anything.


This is irrelevant to Levy's statement. It's also nonsense, since Spurs operate like all clubs in a free market where any club could have bid for any of those players if they'd wanted to (or if their scouting network had been good enough) and all clubs are looking to get the best deal they can.


If they don't accept it? Levy's statement made it clear that Spurs had already told MUFC long ago that they were not interested in selling Berbatov.

Despite this, Fergie continued with his campaign, publicly saying that he was after Berbatov, was confident of getting him and that time was on his side. All the anger at Real Madrid's attempts to unsettle Ronaldo and prise him away is now shown to have been just a load of hypocritical guff.


This is also irrelevant. It also shows that you're out of touch. Planning permission for a new stadium to be built immediately next door to WHL is expected this September.


You've answered your own question: supply and demand. In any case, with a lower capacity stadium currently, Spurs need to charge more for tickets in order to compete financially with clubs that have bigger stadiums and so can sell more tickets.


Good luck with your massive debt. How long will it be before it hits the 1 billion pound mark? These chickens will come to roost eventually and when they do the MUFC fire-sale will begin.

You're the one saying that 25m for Modric is "easily affordable" - not me. In any case, I didn't limit my reply to this January, I also included next summer ... and I'm happy to extend my the scope of my argument well beyond that if you wish.


The premise is that your financial chickens are finally starting to come home to roost, which would hardly be surprising given the current financial climate, the stupendously large sums of money owed and the interest payments being sucked outwards.

If the premise is correct, then logic says (a) that you might not have large sums of cash to spend lots on signing new players for the forseeable future - not without first selling players to raise the cash at least; and (b) that some or all of the Ronaldo cash will disappear into debt servicing.

You're saying that the premise is wrong - fair enough, although I note that some of your fellow supporters don't share this cosy view.

But if the premise is right, then the logic is pretty obvious and fairly strong it seems to me.


Unwarranted arrogance I'm afraid.

A 28 year-old Berbatov wanting CL football is not the same as a 24 year-old Modric who (we're assuming) would already have the promise of it at Spurs. Modric might still wish to come to Man. United in those circumstances, but I doubt he'd be that fussed about it if Spurs told him he was staying.

You are effectively saying that money shouldn't matter - but of course it does matter, especially to a club that has not had the benefit of regular CL income and which is planning to finance a new stadium, not to mention currently financing the construction a of brand new training complex.

Levy can hardly be criticised for a lack of ambition: he's invested a lot in players (net spend) and facilities for players, and has managed to keep Spurs finances on an even keel whilst doing so. And I don't want to see Spurs racking up huge debts like Liverpool and Man. Utd ... because sooner or later those chickens come home to roost.

So of course it would have been silly for Spurs to commit 40m+ on Fabiano: much better to take bargains like VdV when we can, and keep our powder dry for the January window.

I'm disputing your crazy notion that money shouldn't matter to a club that's seeking to progress ...

And I'm saying that, regardless of how your debt arose, the debt "chickens" eventually come home to roost ... as many clubs have found to their cost.

Sure, Spurs could have found the money to commit 40+m on Fabiano (fee + wages on a 5 year contract), but then we'd not likely not have had the money to spend more sensibly later on ... except by borrowing it or selling off a key player. And then what would we do in January or next summer if a player like Suarez (for example), suddenly does becomes available?

Yes, I think long-standing issues are coming home to roost. They include:

* Rooney blowing repeatedly hot and cold about staying. In the summer (after he blew cold for the 2nd time around) you could have sold him abroad for decent money and replaced him with someone committed to the cause. Now he'll definitely want out in the summer, and it'll just add to the enormous number of new players that you'll need to recruit and integrate in one go.

* The fact that Fergie got the squad to over-perform. Now he's gone, the cracks are revealed and the true level of actual quality in the squad is showing.

* The long-standing CM recruitment problem.

* The number of ageing players in your squad.

* The sub-par level of most of the new players you've been signing for some while now, whilst hailing them all as potential world-beaters.

In your current squad, probably only around half will be staying or deserve to stay next summer. That's a huge problem, which isn't going to be fixed in a hurry. I don't see you finishing in the top 4, which will make next summer all the more difficult. And if you mess up the summer transfer window I reckon you'll end up as also-rans for many seasons to come.

Which brings us to the latest issue coming home to roost: Moyes himself. When so many new players will be needed, is he really the man you want to be in charge of spending bucket-loads of cash? And how many transfer targets will actually want to come and play under Moyes?

After years of letting things drift (because success kept on coming), you now need to wake up, be decisive and ruthless: sack Moyes (at the season end at the latest), appoint someone credible - someone with a vision of attacking and entertaining football - and go for a big clearing of the decks squad-wise.

No, it's not a yes: I've already said that if Spurs had £80m to spend I could think of dozens of better ways than spending it than spending it on Pogba.

Pogba would certainly be given every chance to stake his claim to a starting spot. However, you forget that Spurs midfield is better than United's. Your midfield need is greater than ours.

Sooner or later the financial chickens come home to roost. If you spend a vast sum of Pogba then down the line that money is not available for other players and/or wages.

Worried about it? As I've said, I really hope you do spend £100m on Pogba.

I've seen many posters on here talk about £100m as if it's nothing to United, when actually it's a very large chunk of your entire club income in the last published annual accounts ... and that's not counting the perhaps £50+m wages that could well be involved.

Yes, the payments would be spread out, but then so are all the future payments committed to from your vast spending since Fergie left. Cumulatively, these all add up ... and eventually the financial chickens come home to roost.

I have. £150+m including wages is well over one-third of your total income (£395m) in your last published annual accounts (filed October 2015). Yes, your income has increased since then, but even so ...

Yes the payments and wages would be spread out into the future, but this comes on top of massive net spending on additions to your last title winning squad ... much of which also involves future payment commitments. Cumulatively this all adds up. Chickens come home to roost.

Very obviously, it's not a burden borne by income from single year ... it's just a waste of time to pretend I've said otherwise. But it is a stark illustration of the size of current and future spending commitments that United seem bent on taking on with Pogba. And it needs to be considered in aggregate with all the other current and future payments (fee instalments + wages) that United are already committed to.

So many United fans seem to think that your money is endless. But it won't be too long now before the chickens come home to roost.

These goddamn financial chickens...almost been 10 years!
 
Agree. Don't forget TFM to, I'd still prefer to see him at CB or DM (although that is more risky).

Haven't forgotten him, but I think Mourinho will value him more in midfield or as a right-back, since he can get more involved going forward.
 
I don't think we will be in the market for another CB this Summer. We will be down the line though, As Jose will start to see the liability that Jones is, if he hasn't started to see it already.

It depends how our young players develop. Tuanzebe and Fosu-Mensah are probably going to be in the first team squad this season and Williams and Poole are big prospects as well.
 
@GlastonSpur , the Caf's resident combined poultry farmer and financial accountant.
It's remarkable how long he's been obsessed with the United financial chickens...first he went after the debt reaching 1 billion which turned out to be bollocks and now he has all sorts of new claims over Pogba

edit - he logged off :lol:
 
Last edited:
The Guardian reported up to £25m whilst the BBC and Sky reported a fee in the region of £30m. Not over £32m, anyway.

There are plenty of clubs who have spent vast sums on their squads since that time, yours included, so I fail to see how that is a criticism exclusive to United.

If the transfer value was denominated in Euros it could easily have been £30m at the time it was reported and £32m (or more) by the time it's paid. Brexit strikes again.
 
GlastonSpurs has been waiting for his Glastonomics theory to succeed and United to go bust and bankrupt for the past decade. He would keep posting the same for another decade. :lol:
 
If the transfer value was denominated in Euros it could easily have been £30m at the time it was reported and £32m (or more) by the time it's paid. Brexit strikes again.
Transfermarket also reports the Mkhitaryan fee as £35m so I tend to believe that their figures are just inaccurate
 
I bet you're fun on a night out...

Down the line if we continue to not make the Champions League and the sponsorship deals dry up then yes I agree we will get to the point where we cannot spend lots, but right now we can afford it so we do right in trying to buy the players who will get us back to the top. If you are talking about business sense then signing Zlatan and Pogba alone make a lot of sense, the club will make that money back in marketing and shirt sales alone. Pogba also has a huge deal with Adidas what will also help our standing with them.

You really won't, not even remotely. Where do you get these outlandish ideas from? Pogba alone will likely cost the club north of £160m in fees and wages.
 
Transfermkt say £32m.
Transfermarkt is sometimes not accurate with the transfer fees. They have City paying £25.93m for Mangala, when it was fairly reliably reported that he cost City £42m (after all the third party fees). Bailly, I thought cost an initial £22m, which rises to around £30m (deal was concluded before Brexit, while Transfermarkt made the change in the transfer values after Brexit to get more accurate values in pound Sterling).
 
So how come we have managed to decrease our debt while heavily spending on players the last years? Since we are in such financial turmoil and everything.... "

I haven't said that you are in financial turmoil. I've said you're heading that way if things continue in the same vein.
 
Transfermarket also reports the Mkhitaryan fee as £35m so I tend to believe that their figures are just inaccurate
I think the reason for that is that they are a German website, so they got their value from what Dortmund leaked (42m euros). Like with Schweinsteiger, when Bayern briefed German papers that United paid 20m euros, only for it actually be around 9m euros.
 
Axel has been promoted and Williams is also in the wings waiting for his chance. So we can pass a new signing. No need
 
I haven't said that you are in financial turmoil. I've said you're heading that way if things continue in the same vein.
You used to say this about the debt 8 years ago (you said something about how it would reach 1 billion or something I think). Is it not time to accept Woodward has a better understanding of our financial situation than you?
 
You really won't, not even remotely. Where do you get these outlandish ideas from? Pogba alone will likely cost the club north of £160m in fees and wages.

I haven't said that you are in financial turmoil. I've said you're heading that way if things continue in the same vein.

Do you have anything to offer to the actual topic this thread is about? You can always start a new thread, if you want to discuss United's finances. Do you think we need another centre-back? Bailly and Smalling are most likely going to be first choice. Rojo or Jones could be sold.
 
These goddamn financial chickens...almost been 10 years!

All that most of those quotes show is that most of my predictions were correct.

For example:

* "It also shows that you're out of touch. [We will get] Planning permission for a new stadium to be built immediately next door to WHL ..." The new stadium is now well underway, despite all those saying it would never happen.

* "The fact that Fergie got the squad to over-perform. Now he's gone, the cracks are revealed and the true level of actual quality in the squad is showing" Enough said.

* "The sub-par level of most of the new players you've been signing for some while now, whilst hailing them all as potential world-beaters". Again, enough said.

* "Moyes himself. When so many new players will be needed, is he really the man you want to be in charge of spending bucket-loads of cash? And how many transfer targets will actually want to come and play under Moyes?" Again, enough said, although at the time my saying this was widely derided on here.

* "I don't see you finishing in the top 4" [during the Moyes era]. This prediction was widely derided on here.

* After years of letting things drift (because success kept on coming), you now need to wake up, be decisive and ruthless: sack Moyes"

* Modric wouldn't be sold to United. He wasn't.

The only thing that has changed is that (a) Berbatov was sold to United and (b) your debt has reduced, although I see that your total finance costs (interest etc), according to your last published accounts, increased from the year before.

You think chickens haven't started to come home to roost? You've dropped out of the top 4 twice in the last 3 seasons. Some of that is due to Fergie's enforced neglect of the squad prior to his leaving (as I said in the posts you've quoted, and due to your debt at the time, "... you might not have large sums of cash to spend lots on signing new players for the forseeable future + "some or all of the Ronaldo cash will disappear into debt servicing"), and some of it is due to poor transfer signings in the huge and panicky spending splurge that followed from Moyes onwards.

And now the United spending splurge is accelerating further. Such spending will have consequences, however much United fans want to ignore it.
 
... Do you think we need another centre-back? Bailly and Smalling are most likely going to be first choice. Rojo or Jones could be sold.

Yes I do (but that doesn't mean I think Bailly won't be good - I've really no idea about him). You should go for no-nonsense, experienced CB who is already adapted to the Prem.

But the problem with selling Rojo or Jones (or most United players I'd guess) is that I'd imagine that they are on high wages compared to what any possible buying club could afford to pay (considering knock-on wage demands across their squads etc), so who will take them unless for a totally knock-down fee or United subsidising their wages?
 
Yes I do (but that doesn't mean I think Bailly won't be good - I've really no idea about him). You should go for no-nonsense, experienced CB who is already adapted to the Prem.

But the problem with selling Rojo or Jones (or most United players I'd guess) is that I'd imagine that they are on high wages compared to what any possible buying club could afford to pay (considering knock-on wage demands across their squads etc), so who will take them unless for a totally knock-down fee or United subsidising their wages?

We'll probably continue to suck at selling players. Their wages could be the problem as you say. The same thing that happened with Evans could be happening with Jones. Ultimately if Jones isn't needed anymore, he'll move on, since he'll want first team football.

Van Dijk is probably the only defender who's remotely available from the EPL, who I'd hope we sign. Don't think it's going to happen though. IMO Williams, Reid, Tomkins or Fonte aren't going to help us.
 
Why is this Spurs fan so obsessed with with United's finances?
 
I know it's' early but I think Smalling and Bailly have the makings of a great partnership. Both tall, quick, strong.

Jones and Blind as backups is okay, although Jones can't really be relied upon, and then there's TFM and Tuanzebe. I wouldn't want to limit the latter two's chances.
 
Why is this Spurs fan so obsessed with with United's finances?
Jealous because Spurs are skint. I said back in January they'll struggle to buy because they're trying to get a new stadium and I've been proven right so far.
 
I would loan out Mcnair and sell Rojo. I would give Darmian another season to prove himself and sign Manolas or Van Dijk.
 
I'd really like Van* Djik I think he's great, but it's not as simple as sell Jones and Rojo and buy him and that's that. Southampton won't want to sell and they've already lost a couple so I doubt they'll fancy selling another main player.
 
Obsessed with our finances? Feck, he's obsessed with the whole club. Just envy, presumably.

Hardly, when we have CL football to look forward to ... not to mention our new stadium.

Jealous because Spurs are skint. I said back in January they'll struggle to buy because they're trying to get a new stadium and I've been proven right so far.

You and everyone else, including me: it's hardly rocket science when we have a whole new stadium complex to finance. Spurs have had a very low net spend for several years past, long before January, all with the new stadium in mind.

But then again we have enough spare money for what we need this summer, namely to strengthen 3 or 4 squad cover/competition positions. Our first XI is already in good shape.
 
Some mod should change Glaston's tagline to 'financial chickens come home to roost'.
 
I'd really like Van* Djik I think he's great, but it's not as simple as sell Jones and Rojo and buy him and that's that. Southampton won't want to sell and they've already lost a couple so I doubt they'll fancy selling another main player.

Has he improved a lot? I read Chelsea are in for him.
 
Last edited:
You and everyone else, including me: it's hardly rocket science when we have a whole new stadium complex to finance. Spurs have had a very low net spend for several years past, long before January, all with the new stadium in mind.

But then again we have enough spare money for what we need this summer, namely to strengthen 3 or 4 squad cover/competition positions. Our first XI is already in good shape.
Why are you lying? I remember last transfer window me and you had a conversation in which I said you can't afford a backup striker and Poch wasn't happy about it. You said you had plenty to spend and I was wrong that building a new ground will set you back financially.
You can't say one thing and then just pretend you didn't mate