I wouldn't buy Rice as I feel that we can get similar talent at a lower price from other or lower league. With Covid, surely there is a midfielder who cost 20-30 mil that plays as well as Rice. Sell Lingard to buy another midfielder.
The issue is we don't play with a pure defensive midfielder.People say all he can do is win back the ball and is positionally good but is that not exactly what we want a defensive midfielder to do? Why is there now a requirement that he is peak Pirlo or something? We have DvB, Pogba and Bruno for creativity in midfield and we also signed Sancho who is a creative player as well.
He'd be with us for the rest of his career most likely, it's the sort of spend that in the end would look a bargain I think.
The people who don't see what he's doing most likely took forever to appreciate what Carrick brought to our side. It's just not obvious enough for them.
I agree he is what we need.People say all he can do is win back the ball and is positionally good but is that not exactly what we want a defensive midfielder to do? Why is there now a requirement that he is peak Pirlo or something? We have DvB, Pogba and Bruno for creativity in midfield and we also signed Sancho who is a creative player as well.
Agree, the bolded sums up my overall feeling.Yes, I understand that perspective, and really I agree; if we lose Pogba he has to be replaced with a creative player.
Overall, Rice in and Pogba out is not ideal at all. Rice should be in addition to Pogba.
and that affects you how? We have never had "unlimited" money but if we want (or need) a player, we have to pay the asking price (or close to it). You can say you don't think someone is worth the money but in the end, it isn't you paying. Or do you really think we are going to go bust? As Bobby Charlton once said: "If Manchester United go bust, we can all go home"
He would be nothing like Maguire? Maguire is a complete CB.The issue for me is just his price, I'd have him here in a heartbeat. I don't think he solves all our problems in midfield but adding him and Varane would ensure a really strong defence and defensive cover. Last season I felt whenever we were under pressure in a game, we'd cave in eventually and concede a silly goal. Rice is excellent at spotting and averting dangerous situations. He'd be like a Maguire signing in midfield.
Someone speaking some sense, yes his price tag is very high but we can include Lingard, Matic or Pereira, perhaps even Tuanzebe on loan,The issue for me is just his price, I'd have him here in a heartbeat. I don't think he solves all our problems in midfield but adding him and Varane would ensure a really strong defence and defensive cover. Last season I felt whenever we were under pressure in a game, we'd cave in eventually and concede a silly goal. Rice is excellent at spotting and averting dangerous situations. He'd be like a Maguire signing in midfield.
This is rather silly. We see what he does. We just don't think he's good enough overall. He can't lace Carrick's boots as a player on the ball and there's not much between them defensively. Rice better in some aspects and Carrick better in others but not a massive swing either way. He's just not good enough a footballer.He'd be with us for the rest of his career most likely, it's the sort of spend that in the end would look a bargain I think.
The people who don't see what he's doing most likely took forever to appreciate what Carrick brought to our side. It's just not obvious enough for them.
Erm I think it's you who is missing the point, that he's going to cost more than 50 million (more like 80 given WHs stance) and hence being better than average players can and will not be the criteria.Lots of people are missing the point, lets not compare him to Matic in his prime, the only question you have to ask is simply is he better than Fred or Scott? If so he'll make our team better.
Yes they're probably better people out there but 1 step at a time.
THIS.He costs too much. I see what he brings but I dont care. Do people that want him actually want us to spend 70m on him when we can hypothetically get 2 midfielders (eg Locatelli and Bissouma) for that price
There wouldn't be a McFred in tandem but I suspect one of the two would be playing. So either McTominay or Fred would partner Rice. Pogba isn't a player who is suited to playing the deeper role when it comes to off the ball work, hence why he has been deployed in a different role by Ole, playing in a advanced role on the left.If we sign rice, there wouldn't be a mcfred.
It would rice pogba and Bruno. That's why you sign rice.
In the scenario your talking about Bruno isn't even on the pitch let alone pogba
There wouldn't be a McFred in tandem but I suspect one of the two would be playing. So either McTominay or Fred would partner Rice. Pogba isn't a player who is suited to playing the deeper role when it comes to off the ball work, hence why he has been deployed in a different role by Ole, playing in a advanced role on the left.
Where we're currently as a squad, we need someone to come in and partner Fred IMO. I can't see us signing two midfielders, so if it comes down to a, either or situation, then it's best we target a player who will provide craft and guile from midfield along with the ability to perform his defensive duties, rather than a combative type who isn't gonna elevate us when it comes playing through a well coordinated high press.If we need an extra player to compensate for Pogba that’s a problem in itself.
Nice to see someone thinking along the same lines as me. I have seen quite a few people talk about how Rice would allow us to have more attackers on the pitch, but having more attackers does not always equal a better attack. Rice is a fantastic defender, but a very basic footballer. The team needs to attack as a unit, and also defend as a unit.Where we're currently as a squad, we need someone to come in and partner Fred IMO. I can't see us signing two midfielders, so if it comes down to a, either or situation, then it's best we target a player who will provide craft and guile from midfield along with the ability to perform his defensive duties, rather than a combative type who isn't gonna elevate us when it comes playing through a well coordinated high press.
Good post, completely agree. And you nailed it when you said 'we need to attack as a unit and defend as a unit'Nice to see someone thinking along the same lines as me. I have seen quite a few people talk about how Rice would allow us to have more attackers on the pitch, but having more attackers does not always equal a better attack. Rice is a fantastic defender, but a very basic footballer. The team needs to attack as a unit, and also defend as a unit.
I have always thought that the deepest midfielder in an ideal team should be the one offering the most security and control on the ball. It is easy to look at Pogba and Fernandes - who are probably the best individuals in the squad - and think that Rice's instinct and quality in defence would allow us to get both on the pitch at the same time in a 4-3-3, but ball handling, balance and security in possession has always been a very underrated part of midfield play especially in a 433.
Fernandes especially has made his reputation based on his numbers which IMO really isn't what midfielders should be judged on. Pogba has always struggled to find that balance between attack, midfield and defence, and Rice the midfielder is a defender - a good one - nothing more.
A team needs midfielders who are comfortable deep in the progression phase, receiving the ball under pressure on the half turn and moving it around (especially forward) with little risk of giving it away. I personally think that quality for midfielders far outweighs any realistic amount of goals, assists and defensive actions. It provides a platform, and allows the team to maintain possession, dominate territory and create closer to the opposition's goal.
A combination of Rice, Pogba and Bruno will not provide that platform despite how balanced it looks on paper. Rice has always been very basic with his passing, so he is not a midfielder you would trust to consistently find the other two in advanced positions. That would force Pogba and Fernandes to play deeper to get on the ball, moving them away from their comfort zone and a system that theoretically was supposed to allow them to play higher up the pitch would have the opposite effect. Pogba and Fernandes are top footballers - they wouldn't be rated so highly rated if they were not, but feck knows, if it came to doing what a Toni Kroos or a Modric does, I'd swap both for Wijnaldum in a heartbeat.
Obviously we could make it work, but I have no confidence that we will, I haven't seen any evidence that it is what we are trying to do. We have always played a 4231 formation since Bruno Fernandes arrived, with two CMs, the idea being for them to take turns attacking and defending, pressing and retreating, driving with the ball and passing it on, moving around the pitch and holding their positions, getting in the box and staying deep - A classic double pivot, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. People tend to lump Fred and McTominay together which is understandable considering how much they play together, but it has really been Fred attacking, defending and progressing the ball, and McTominay doing the same thing - as he should, but to far less extent in all three.
If we are going to stick with the same system that we played the whole of last season, then I think we should back and sign players who fit into it, and try to avoid players who do not. I've been a fan of Rice since he broke out, but the reason I don't want him is I don't see how he fits in our system, he is not as dynamic as we would want him to be. Pogba is another one who isn't, and we have struggled to fit him in.
Fred on the other hand seems to be a perfect fit, a prototype of the midfielder we should be looking for. He has his weaknesses, but he is a natural for that role, and I've always said that we should be looking to find another midfielder of similar profile and better if we can find one. A midfielder who offers plenty on the ball while providing enough security in defence. Rice is not that midfielder.
But I think Rice and McT has potential as a pair, for some games.
I think it can be better spent than £90m odd for rice. Assuming we don’t have unlimited transfer funds it’s in my interest that we use it in a prudent way.why does someone else's money matter to you?
I think it can be better spent than £90m odd for rice. Assuming we don’t have unlimited transfer funds it’s in my interest that we use it in a prudent way.
Still a lot of people it seems have only seen him play for England doing simple stuff. Fair enough but that’s not the full picture.
Here you will see a cleaner tackler, give and go, running with the ball, heading, passing through the lines and an impressive long pass.
the guy would be brilliant for our midfield. He really is like a young Keane
ignore the crappy music
Is Rice like Keane?
Keane was not a DM although he could tackle all day, he wasn't an AM although he could shoot and head in the box and score a reasonable amount of goals. Keane was a 'proper' CM, and above all he was a leader with driving stubborn streak.
I doubt Rice is as good as Keane overall mainly because of that mentality, but if he is say 85% as good then he could be exactly what United need. The transfer numbers are bit higher than £3.75m but then the world of football went crazy a long time ago.
McRice combination would be a disaster in midfield passing, as they are both very limited/poor passer of ball. It’s only good when defending against strong team, when we are looking for a draw.Yes, I understand that perspective, and really I agree; if we lose Pogba he has to be replaced with a creative player.
But I think Rice and McT (rather than Fred) has potential as a pair, for some games. In that case we’ll be asking Bruno to get on the ball in slightly deeper areas with McT running past him and getting into the box sometimes. If there’s no Pogba, it’s possible Sancho might change the dynamic and balance for the good but we don’t know quite how he’s going to fit in.
Overall, Rice in and Pogba out is not ideal at all. Rice should be in addition to Pogba.
Yes, I understand that perspective, and really I agree; if we lose Pogba he has to be replaced with a creative player.
But I think Rice and McT (rather than Fred) has potential as a pair, for some games. In that case we’ll be asking Bruno to get on the ball in slightly deeper areas with McT running past him and getting into the box sometimes. If there’s no Pogba, it’s possible Sancho might change the dynamic and balance for the good but we don’t know quite how he’s going to fit in.
Overall, Rice in and Pogba out is not ideal at all. Rice should be in addition to Pogba.
Claiming he is young Keane is way too off. He never impress as much as you claim in a 90 mins match, posting a YouTube footage to prove anything would make Mctominay looks good too mind. More like a new Schneiderlin for me though, which isn’t bad at that time as he was also supposed to be our dream signing.
we know he can sit in front of a back 4 and mop up loose balls, but we don’t know if he can take it to teams who sit back.
where’s his passing range, can he switch the ball, can he break the lines?
for £70m you’re expecting a lot - and I don’t think he has a lot to his game.
If we can get him for £40m and swap with lingard then I think fair enough, but he’s genuinely not better than Fred and very similar to Mctominay.
people saying he’d walk into our midfield and be a sensational upgrade are going to be disappointed.
Squad player at best.
Yeah passing-wise it’s not great. I like McT carrying the ball and getting into the box. Fred wouldn’t be much / any better passing-wise really.McRice combination would be a disaster in midfield passing, as they are both very limited/poor passer of ball. It’s only good when defending against strong team, when we are looking for a draw.