John O'Shea
He's the second choice goalkeeper with a year left on his contract who is 32 with your first choice is 22. £10m is still a ridiculous amount of money. To put it into perspective, that would be the 5th most expensive goalkeeper of all time, or there abouts.The big caveat from Mourinho, however, is that Chelsea would only countenance a sale that reflects Cech’s ongoing status as one of the best goalkeeper in the world.
“I don’t think Petr is a guy to be persuaded,” said Mourinho. “I will just wait, wishing his decision is to stay. But I don’t waste my time trying to persuade him. If he tells me he wants to leave I will tell him my opinion: that he is one of the three best goalkeepers in the world, so huge money.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...eave-Chelsea-but-it-will-take-huge-offer.html
Read the thread?
Are you always like this or just Sunday mornings? It was a simple question.
Krul is mediocre
I expect Valdes will replace him in the summer; perhaps Tim Krul as the backup.
Krul is mediocre
I thought he played very well, had a great assist as well.Terrible against us as well only 10 days ago
1. Marc-André ter Stegen
2. Tim Krul
3. Hugo Lloris
Really?
The big caveat from Mourinho, however, is that Chelsea would only countenance a sale that reflects Cech’s ongoing status as one of the best goalkeeper in the world.
“I don’t think Petr is a guy to be persuaded,” said Mourinho. “I will just wait, wishing his decision is to stay. But I don’t waste my time trying to persuade him. If he tells me he wants to leave I will tell him my opinion: that he is one of the three best goalkeepers in the world, so huge money.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...eave-Chelsea-but-it-will-take-huge-offer.html
Thats just the typical Chelsea ploy to sell their players at high value, like Mata and others
Like Torres?
I don't want Lloris, cost a bomb and isn't at the top level imo, think Valdes will be fine.
Lloris would cost quite a lot, if Levy decides to become a nice person and do business with us. I would say that he'll cost north of 30m which will be more than what we will get from De Gea if we sell him without renewing his contract. But yeah, Lloris would be my first choice too, if Dave wants to leave.Where did rumours of Tim Krul come from? What, because he's Dutch? Never mind the fact LVG didn't think him good enough to start ahead of that other Dutch numpty in world cup.
DDG certain to go, just hope we can get decent money for him, which, knowing us it will be in exchange for an official y-fronts 'partner' and a handful of magic beans.
Unless we try another young, promising keeper i think the best to go for is lloris, we were apparently very close to buying him before we got DDG. Spurs will shaft us as usual though.
This could happen actually. I remember having a conversation on here ages ago about my feeling that we could still get a hefty fee for him, despite the one-year-contract situation. It's almost in Madrid's interest to spend big and create a fuss, perhaps more so than to get him on the cheap.Lloris would cost quite a lot, if Levy decides to become a nice person and do business with us. I would say that he'll cost north of 30m which will be more than what we will get from De Gea if we sell him without renewing his contract. But yeah, Lloris would be my first choice too, if Dave wants to leave.
Krul shouldn't even be an option, he is several levels below top goalkeepers. If we sign him, it will be the period between Schmeichel 0 VDS all over again.
Anyway, if Dave doesn't extend, I would still prefer to keep him for an another season (and tempt him during the season to sign a new contract, similar to BVB with Reus) rather than lose him for 15-20m, which I guess is the money we would get from him with a single year on his contract. But on the other side, it is possible that Madrid would say 'well, 20m is cheapish, and we need a new Galactico, so here you have 60m for him, regardless that we can get him for free next season'. After all, they need a 'galactico' every year and I guess it will be between Pogba and De Gea. And lets be fair, you can't be both a Galactico and cost 20m at the same time.
Keeper is a position you can get away with not spending big on.
What's the most amount of money a team has got when selling a player with 1 year left on his contract?
We paid 24m for RVP and so did Madrid for Kroos. Can't think of anyone else.
Exactly, I can see lloris costing us twice what we get for DDG if he were to leave. I'd imagine we'll at least give Valdes a season as first choice to see how it happens. But as it has been noted, most teams will get by with an above average keeper so long as the defence is relatively strong so Valdes with Hummels and Varane (purely for arguments sake) in front of him is probably not going to conceed a whole lot more than DDG with Jones and Smalling in front of him.Chelsea will not sell Cech to us so forget that. Annoyingly we won't get much for De Gea as he has only one year left on his contract. Lloris will cost a fortune. In reality, I suspect that Valdes has already been given assurances that he will be no.1 next year though - can't see him coming here just to play U21 football.