Alek M
Da manic one
I rated him better before last night. He was awful making some basic mistakes.
It looks an impossible job if the midfield isn't doing a lot more than RBL's were at that point. I wouldn't want to be trying to deal with Rashford 1v1 with 50 yards of space behind me. Thats not a competition anyones going to have a particularly high success rate with.I've touched on this point before. The way teams like Leipzig are setup it puts alot of pressure on their CBs because not only are they expected to enforce the press in a high-line but also resist the press in a deeper defensive line.
The way we setup is understandable due to the short comings of our CBs which would expose them badly in such a high risk approach hence we have numerous players at fullback and midfield helping to keep defensive balance.
I think both Konate and Upamecano would handle Rashford in a foot race. But when Rashford came on RBL were throwing players forward in droves which left gaping holes at the back due to how high the back line was. So one pass easily penetrated the backline due to the defensive structure being non existent. Most players in that scenario would've been in on goal.It looks an impossible job if the midfield isn't doing a lot more than RBL's were at that point. I wouldn't want to be trying to deal with Rashford 1v1 with 50 yards of space behind me. Thats not a competition anyones going to have a particularly high success rate with.
That is so true. Rashford said similar things in his interview afterwards, that he could see so many gaps.I think both Konate and Upamecano would handle Rashford in a foot race. But when Rashford came on RBL were throwing players forward in droves which left gaping holes at the back due to how high the back line was. So one pass easily penetrated the backline due to the defensive structure being non existent. Most players in that scenario would've been in on goal.
Wish people talked like this to the times we conceded goals when chasing games.I think both Konate and Upamecano would handle Rashford in a foot race. But when Rashford came on RBL were throwing players forward in droves which left gaping holes at the back due to how high the back line was. So one pass easily penetrated the backline due to the defensive structure being non existent. Most players in that scenario would've been in on goal.
Upamecano was poor and due to his poor play we scored several goals. There's no excuse for his poor performance.Wish people talked like this to the times we conceded goals when chasing games.
Upamecano was poor in Rashy’s first goal. He went too deep and missed the press. I call it as I see it. Upamecano is a superb roving defender, but yesterday he was rubbish.
19 year old Mason Greenwood, destroyed him with a deep run. He had a poor game. It happens. Still think he’s quality but doesn’t mean we have to insist there were other factors when for the most part it was himself.
It’s the law of the game though. Great offense will always beat great defense so there’s truth to what he’s saying. Problem is that Upemecano wasn’t great and could have done a lot better for two of the goals.And that’s why you’re not a Champions League level defender.
What is it with people on here using the fact they play football as a means to validate their opinion. I see it quite a lot. Yes it gives you some slight understanding about how to play a position. By the difference between a Champions League quality player and a bottom half of the table quality player is massive let alone the difference between CL and semi-pro.
We do actually! Mengi has all the tools to be a fantastic playerTbh it was the first time I have studied him and nothing stood out for me. Usually even if a team is poor they have players you think hes had a decent game even though the team have lost. I didnt see that.
We have Tuanzebe. Give him game time. Im sure we have other gems in the youth we could try out.
It's because nagelsmanns tactics are so genius that it makes it impossible to defend if you are in the back lineThe disrespect for our defenders the guy literally let in 5 goals and you all want him to replace our defenders with two clean sheets in a row.
I think after this humbling lesson they might consider if they have overestimated their abilities, and introduce some changes. I don’t understand why they put Upamecano in the centre. It lets him shine on the ball, but he has poor awareness and positioning and the attackers have free runs behind and around him all the time. It’s the same weaknesses PSG took advantages of. Better to try Konate in the centre, or try another set-up.I've touched on this point before. The way teams like Leipzig are setup it puts alot of pressure on their CBs because not only are they expected to enforce the press in a high-line but also resist the press in a deeper defensive line.
The way we setup is understandable due to the short comings of our CBs which would expose them badly in such a high risk approach hence we have numerous players at fullback and midfield helping to keep defensive balance.
Upamecano is a very good CB in the making but I've always maintained we needed a different type of CB due to having Axel and Mengi who are stylistically very similar to Upamecano.Being saying it for a few seasons but Konaté is the real CB gem of RB Leipzig.
Upamecamo clearly has a lot of talent and ability but he’s just not there mentally yet. He needs someone to hold his hand and guide him through. Rashford however was just electric last night and many defenders would have struggled to handle that.
I guess the question would be do we need a defender who still needs so much developing.
Konate is the player Nagelsmann originally placed in the centre but he got injured soon after which meant Upamecano was moved centrally. I think now Konate is back he'll eventually be deployed back centrally once he gets his match sharpness back and Upamecano will be deployed as the RCB in a 3 with Halstenberg.I think after this humbling lesson they might consider if they have overestimated their abilities, and introduce some changes. I don’t understand why they put Upamecano in the centre. It lets him shine on the ball, but he has poor awareness and positioning and the attackers have free runs behind and around him all the time. It’s the same weaknesses PSG took advantages of. Better to try Konate in the centre, or try another set-up.
It looks an impossible job if the midfield isn't doing a lot more than RBL's were at that point. I wouldn't want to be trying to deal with Rashford 1v1 with 50 yards of space behind me. Thats not a competition anyones going to have a particularly high success rate with.
Because we were linked with him and people read a few transfer rumours I expect, that makes him better than our players obviously. Just see the posts asking to break the bank for himHow does this random footballer have such a fan club on here?
Some really poor verdicts and posts after the match, it really shows the lack of understanding of the game. Not that I am some tactical mastermind, but come on. To put it on the edge; from the 75th minute they could have had a hybrid monster of Baresi, Cannavaro, van Dijk and Vidic at the back and still concede five goals. The team played with a silly high line, just like Roma did against Liverpool a few years ago, and gave us 60 yards to exploit. Case in point, Rashford was played through from his own fecking half at 1-0 to seal the deal. How often do you see a possible offside decision ruled out because the attacking player is starting in his own half? Perhaps at 2-0 in the 94th minute in a cup game, not 15 minutes from time at 1-0.
The five goals at the back had little to do with any individual player, but their chosen tactic as they needed a goal. If Maguire or Lindelöf played for Leipzig the last 15 minutes, it’s not like we would see anything else. Rate Upamecano based on the first 75 minutes, not on the last 15 minutes of collective suicide put in place by the manager. No defender likes or wants to set the line in the middle of the pitch, just like none of our attackers want to play 75 minutes without an attacking combination.
He's not random. He had a terrible game, it happens to the best of them. The problem is that the caftards are going 180° on him, from ridiculious praise to OTT criticism.How does this random footballer have such a fan club on here?
but I think they just collapsed when Sabitzer came on.
He was pressed and passed the ball straight in to the feet of Bruno, if I remember correctly.Didn't he get tackled as near enough the last man on Cavani's disallowed goal too?
How does this random footballer have such a fan club on here?
Rio's West Ham got beaten 7-1 at OT before he moved to Leeds. He learned to be a good defender out of the limelight and I think Upamecano needs to stay at RB for at least another season.I thought he was good up until the last 20 minutes. Comfortable on the ball, good defender.
The whole team fell apart, not just him, I would still be delighted if we signed him. He’s young. It’s easy to forget how poor Rio was for us at times in his early years.
Both are still really young mate.He's been highly rated for years on Football Manager and FIFA. Fans of many clubs speak positively about him online, fantasize about signing him. This creates a narrative that he is awesome.
Unfortunately the reality is that very few of the same fans have seen him play regularly. They will protest otherwise, of course.
Same is true of De Ligt. Massively overhyped.
I’m sorry but I don’t rate a CB’s performance in a game from just parts of it. We can find all sorts of excuses for him and I agree that the whole setup and defence was poor , but his pass in to the feet of Bruno, as last man, was not because it was everybody else’s fault, it was his. He was also dribbled for one goal. It can happen but it is not everybody else’s fault, it’s his. Even if we only look at the first 75 minutes he still wasnt too impressive. He missed Greenwood’s run for the first goal. He also lost the ball when he tried to dribble and didn’t run home at all.Some really poor verdicts and posts after the match, it really shows the lack of understanding of the game. Not that I am some tactical mastermind, but come on. To put it on the edge; from the 75th minute they could have had a hybrid monster of Baresi, Cannavaro, van Dijk and Vidic at the back and still concede five goals. The team played with a silly high line, just like Roma did against Liverpool a few years ago, and gave us 60 yards to exploit. Case in point, Rashford was played through from his own fecking half at 1-0 to seal the deal. How often do you see a possible offside decision ruled out because the attacking player is starting in his own half? Perhaps at 2-0 in the 94th minute in a cup game, not 15 minutes from time at 1-0.
The five goals at the back had little to do with any individual player, but their chosen tactic as they needed a goal. If Maguire or Lindelöf played for Leipzig the last 15 minutes, it’s not like we would see anything else. Rate Upamecano based on the first 75 minutes, not on the last 15 minutes of collective suicide put in place by the manager. No defender likes or wants to set the line in the middle of the pitch, just like none of our attackers want to play 75 minutes without an attacking combination.
The best features of our back line in the last games have been concentration, positioning and working as a unit, imo. Neither of those attributes could be seen in Leipzig’s back line yesterday. He has the physics attributes plus the ball handling, but the rest?I think Upamecano would look a lot better in our system last night because he's very strong in the penalty box, can step out and can pass well. Personally I'd still be interested in signing him but I'm not convinced he's the guy to pair with Maguire to allow us to play with a high line.