glazed
Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2012
- Messages
- 8,439
I think even if Kane had scored penalty we would still have lost.
I agree. 10 years at least
If you think all Modric does well is passing then you misunderstand football.
It's his reading of the game, close control, supporting play, vision and creativity which make him generational.
I also think Bellingham will become elite but he's a sightly different player.
I thought Theo Hernanez actually did ok despite the commentary. The issue was Upemacano.
Ah well, fair fecks to France. No complaints. Bellingham, Foden, Saka, Rice, Mount, probably four years away from being at their peak. Positive for future.
Why? Struggling to see what Deschamps would get credit for tonight that Southgate wouldn’t. England were the better team in every metric.
Good one. You know what I meant.
Leaving Rashford on the bench but using Sterling was insane. It was like he had the team working to find a goal for Kane, as nobody else was scoring. Giving Rashford 5 minutes was a disgrace!Should've kept Saka on. Even tired he would've done more than Sterling.
The arrogaanceITV still talking about Morocco like they were an instant win for England, just adding "with the greatest of respect" doesn't mean you're actually giving any respect.
It’s also he’s a better manager. Deschamps was winning so his changes were not as pressing as Southgate’s. Talent wise it was about even.Feels it's a bit weird to fault Southgate for not making changes. Dechampes didn't make any changes either, and they were clearly the weaker side once it was 1-1. If Southgate made the changes you all wanted earlier and France proceeded to win you would all critizise him for making those very changes to break the momentum. The issue today wasn't that Dechampes is a better manager, it's that he's got better quality on the pitch. Simple as that.
Harry Kane one on one, Jude Belingham volley, Saka having the ball taken off his toe at the last second to prevent a tap in, Harry Kane deflected shot saved by Lloris, Saka going past 3 defenders ending with a weak finish rolled straight to Lloris. You think Lloris was man of the match for no reason? GTFOHBecause you can’t. You’ve thrown your toys out of the pram like an overgrown baby. Accept you’re wrong and move on.
Nah, they created nothing. Southgate is wasting this generation.Feel gutted for England. Deserved more. Difference is really the managers
Upe was Silvestre at his comedy worst tonight, the occasion was too big for him, and Hernandez being erratic as well may in part be explained by the guys closest to him being a bomb scare.
They aren't miracles. It's a viable gameplan being well executed over and over again... for bloody ages. Just look at their record. They've lost 3-4 games in three years. They looked good in 2018 but narrowly lost 1-0 twice and drew 2-2 with Spain. They've gone on and built on that.You can only have so many "miracles". Seriously though, their squad is diminished
It was because Mbappe never helps defensively. His side (left) is badly exposed and England exploited that very well. Saka, in particular.Upe was Silvestre at his comedy worst tonight, the occasion was too big for him, and Hernandez being erratic as well may in part be explained by the guys closest to him being a bomb scare.
I don't fancy France against Morocco with the way their defenders played tonight let alone against Croatia or Argentina
Has loris been troubled?
For me , deschamps took a risk and went with a far more attacking lineup despite multiple injuiries to his star players (benzema, pogba, kante etc.). He put Griezman in midfield along with the usual trident of dembele, mbappe and giroud.
In the end he was rewarded with a griezman to giroud combo that fecking done us.
For us, we went with henderson, rice and bellingham. Henderson and rice were bang average/below average and contributed feck all going forwards. Neither did they prevent the french from scoring.
There were also spells of the game where Griezman playing in midfield ran rings around us, and as aforementioned, assisted the matchwinner.
That was the difference for me.
They still can play them.ITV still talking about Morocco like they were an instant win for England, just adding "with the greatest of respect" doesn't mean you're actually giving any respect.
One chance, numerous hopeful shots from range and one offside. If you want to call them chances, knock yourself out. England were shite.Harry Kane one on one, Jude Belingham volley, Saka having the ball taken off his toe at the last second to prevent a tap in, Harry Kane deflected shot saved by Lloris, Saka going past 3 defenders ending with a weak finish rolled straight to Lloris. You think Lloris was man of the match for no reason? GTFOH
ITV still talking about Morocco like they were an instant win for England, just adding "with the greatest of respect" doesn't mean you're actually giving any respect.
Apart from Mbappe tearing apart their RB, Giroud's going to do a Weghorst tribute act vs Argentina in the final
I did say "miracles". I was jokingThey aren't miracles. It's a viable gameplan being well executed over and over again... for bloody ages. Just look at their record. They've lost 3-4 games in three years. They looked good in 2018 but narrowly lost 1-0 twice and drew 2-2 with Spain. They've gone on and built on that.
If Saiss is out that's a big loss. The other fellow who got red carded was pretty brainless though.
No he wasn't. It was 1-1 for a long time in the second half. That's not winning. And when it was that, England were clearly on top playing wise. Dechampes didn't make any subs, and it worked out for him. Southgate didn't either, and it didn't work out for him. It could just as well have been the other way around. He got saved by having the better talent on the pitch, simple as.It’s also he’s a better manager. Deschamps was winning so his changes were not as pressing as Southgate’s. Talent wise it was about even.
Refs don't score goals and he gave you two pens. Face it, you weren't up to the task. Period.Ref didn't give so many decisions Griezmann should have been booked much earlier, they stopped England playing the first half with so many fouls.
I think the Ref was shit, so many fouls not given.
France obviously are favourites but the Ref didn't help at all.
I want Argentina to win this WC.
It'll be Croatia in the final. I can feel it in my water.
Perhaps that was not worded properly. What I mean is that another manager would have got more out of all the talent we have. Was not praising Deschamps.Why? Struggling to see what Deschamps would get credit for tonight that Southgate wouldn’t. England were the better team in every metric.
Hypothetical but if we had a more progressive and positive manager, would we have done better (and possibly win this match) with a selection of Rashford, Kane and Saka up top with Foden, Bellingham and Rice behind?
I think we would have been far more of a threat.