England were clearly the better team from min 20 on, yet football is such a fine margins game. Southgate will probably go, well knowing that however high the base you pose, it is never high enough to break the ceiling.
In here and on ITV you would think England played well and only lost because of ref.
Keano only one calling them out.
You got 2 pens( both deserved) and still lost . Stats Im sure would prove that doesnt happen too often.
Southgate bottled it tactically for the 3rd tourney in a row when up against quality.
England were clearly tiring 10 minutes before the goal and he didnt make any subs. Deer in the headlights again.
France were decent but thats it.
It'll be Croatia in the final. I can feel it in my water.
cmon messi, the road's open for one more heatbreaking final
You snuck Mount in there
starting xi was fine. what he missed was bringing on rashford soon after the 1-1.
I am Croatian and French. So I am a bit tired to hear that my teams are lucky.
For me , deschamps took a risk and went with a far more attacking lineup despite multiple injuiries to his star players (benzema, pogba, kante etc.). He put Griezman in midfield along with the usual trident of dembele, mbappe and giroud.
In the end he was rewarded with a griezman to giroud combo that fecking done us.
For us, we went with henderson, rice and bellingham. Henderson and rice were bang average/below average and contributed feck all going forwards. Neither did they prevent the french from scoring.
There were also spells of the game where Griezman playing in midfield ran rings around us, and as aforementioned, assisted the matchwinner.
That was the difference for me.
Perhaps that was not worded properly. What I mean is that another manager would have got more out of all the talent we have. Was not praising Deschamps.
Easy to go with the Griezman - Grioud combo for the winner, but having one less midfielder did lead to England controlling the game in midfield. I thought Griezman caused minimal problems overall, despite having a good 20 minutes or so before the first goal.
Team was set up well, stopped Mbappe, but failed to execute and conceded to a brilliant individual strike early on. England had far better chances to win today.
can your narrative beat this one??
I just feel like France won it because Deschamps was brave enough to field Griezman in midfield and Giroud up top.
Those two connected for the match winner.
The equivalent would be putting Foden in central mid and having Rashford up top alongside Kane and Saka.
But that never happened for us and Foden was marked out of the game by kounde, having to hug the touchline.
Varane.All United players gone now, apart from Martinez right?
ITV post match analysis is really just a therapy session.
Argentina's also out for revenge against both Croatia and France.Oh yes. Croatia will be out for revenge for 2018.
I don’t agree that the French frontline are the best. They have the best individual in Mbappe but Giroud is pretty average and Dembele is just quick not that great.i think whatever southgate did defensively was correct because mbappe was invisible, and the french frontline (best in the tournament) was not threatening at all. and i think england did enough to win, not overwhelming but better than france.
not sure if a more attacking team would have done better - the risk is opening it up for mbappe and dembele/griezmann.
i think whatever southgate did defensively was correct because mbappe was invisible, and the french frontline (best in the tournament) was not threatening at all. and i think england did enough to win, not overwhelming but better than france.
not sure if a more attacking team would have done better - the risk is opening it up for mbappe and dembele/griezmann.
Having pickford as our number 1 is also a fecking joke too.
Yep, Henderson vs. Griezmann basically sums it all up.For me , deschamps took a risk and went with a far more attacking lineup despite multiple injuiries to his star players (benzema, pogba, kante etc.). He put Griezman in midfield along with the usual trident of dembele, mbappe and giroud.
In the end he was rewarded with a griezman to giroud combo that fecking done us.
For us, we went with henderson, rice and bellingham. Henderson and rice were bang average/below average and contributed feck all going forwards. Neither did they prevent the french from scoring.
There were also spells of the game where Griezman playing in midfield ran rings around us, and as aforementioned, assisted the matchwinner.
That was the difference for me.
I think the first goal could be saved as it goes in the corner but it curls in so it makes it savable. It doesn’t go over the line anywhere near the cornerYou think Ramsdale or Pope save either goal?
Care to explain why? Pickford did everything you can expect a keeper to do, he didn't feck up anything.Having pickford as our number 1 is also a fecking joke too.
I’m not sure. For the vast majority of the game England seemed the most likely to score next. Their second was a sucker punch really.I think even if Kane had scored penalty we would still have lost.
They seemed, but they were behind twice.I’m not sure. For the vast majority of the game England seemed the most likely to score next. Their second was a sucker punch really.
At least it's one you don't have to pay for. There'll be gallons of ink spilt on the back pages after this, but the pieces will just write themselves. Just cut and paste from every England World Cup post-mortem since 1970.
Will agree with that. The quality in the 4 QFs was pretty dire. Even the "amazing" argentina/holland match really wasnt. It was just banter good, not football good.The semi final matches are trash this year! This competitions been a joke.
Maybe write that down and tape it to your mirror so you can repeat to yourself every day. It won’t make it true but maybe it will make you feel better at some point, as a meditation mantra if nothing else.No he wasn't. It was 1-1 for a long time in the second half. That's not winning. And when it was that, England were clearly on top playing wise. Dechampes didn't make any subs, and it worked out for him. Southgate didn't either, and it didn't work out for him. It could just as well have been the other way around. He got saved by having the better talent on the pitch, simple as.
Care to explain why? Pickford did everything you can expect a keeper to do, he didn't feck up anything.
You think Ramsdale or Pope save either goal?
I’m not sure. For the vast majority of the game England seemed the most likely to score next. Their second was a sucker punch really.
I think the first goal could be saved as it goes in the corner but it curls in so it makes it savable. It doesn’t go over the line anywhere near the corner
He’s only been there long enough to have a sandwich … or maybe half of one.Chelsea ruined Sterling. No one can convince me otherwise.
If you mean the one who said you should have realised Kane was incapable of scoring 2 pens in a row and you should have had another player ready to take the 2nd one, then I think you are being a bit harsh.This woman pundit is absolutely fecking clueless