Red Dreams
Full Member
Absolutely should. Our attack has dominated yet Sterling? Anonymous. It’s telling.
or perhaps start Rashford in the last 16...when it matters.
Absolutely should. Our attack has dominated yet Sterling? Anonymous. It’s telling.
Looking only at matches between the involved teams is already a part of the tie-breaker rules. Arbitrarily removing teams from the equation doesn't really make much sense to me.Or remove the bottom team from the equation.
Really
As England fans we rarely get to see our NT perform at such a high level. Try enjoying the moment rather than find fault in it.
Yeah let’s decide it on arbitrary decisions to issue yellow cards. Should do away with points too.Nah.
I'm more than happy with the result. feck the 1-1 in the second half. Didn't the all signing and dancing get a 0-0 in their first half against these lot? Who cares about halves? It's about the scoreline, progressing into the knockouts with a game spare and finishing with all players fit and ready for the next games.Still expecting more than 1-1 in the 2nd half and no proper chances created in 45 minutes. Panama might not be feeling the heat but as a squad we are physically much fitter and they are a pub team, should still be able to carve out some chances.
Got it.It's just the bizarre rationale that got me
Belgium has one more booking so England 1st at this rate but I think you wanna be 2nd.http://www.espnfc.com/world-cup/4/statistics/performance
Can find stats there. Probably not updated for this result yet.
That’s already part of the rules for a three way tie too. It’s irrelevant really, those are the rules. Just seems silly to me that fair play is the next go to.Looking only at matches between the involved teams is already a part of the tie-breaker rules. Arbitrarily removing teams from the equation doesn't really make much sense to me.
I'd rather play Brazil or Germany.Belgium has one more booking so England 1st at this rate but I think you wanna be 2nd.
If both get into the quarters the team that came 2nd would likely play Mexico or Swiss and the team that won would likely play Brazil or Germany.
Yes, because the top 3 is part of the "involved teams" then.That’s already part of the rules for a three way tie too.
They obviously need a Scouse trainer if they reach WC 2022agreed, but they did calm it down for the second half.
Well if we play well enough we'd eventually more than likely play them. Why not build more momentum first though? I wouldn't want them in the first knockout gameI'd rather play Brazil or Germany.
You asked whether Rashford was being saved for latter stages.You think Sterling is going to start ahead of Rashford on that back of that performance?
I'm not an England fan.
Jesus, Sterling has been gash.
Correct, Belgium got 3 against Panama and England got 1 in each match.England 2 yellow cards
Belgium, 3 yellow cards
guy on TV just said.
Who? Has-Been & Gash?Both City players as well.
Yes saved for the Belgium match and possibly the knockout stages if he holds his place in the team which he probably will. I reckon Southgate has seen enough from Sterling to realise that he's wasted in this system and Rashford is a much better fit.You asked whether Rashford was being saved for latter stages.
I’m perfectly aware of that, thanks. Like I said it’s irrelevant, the rules are what they are. It’s just a shit way to decide it I’d say. Especially when the only option after that is to draw lots. I don’t see how that’s better than removing the bottom team results to decide between the two as it’s more of a guide as to who has done better.Yes, because the top 3 is part of the "involved teams" then.
If Kane carries on scoring, I can see Madrid making a world record bid
Both City players as well.
Who? Has-Been & Gash?