surf
Full Member
Playing with width and pace is effective if your wide men are Ronaldo and Giggs. Not so much with Young and Valencia. Whatever happened to the idea of playing to your strengths?
Playing with width and pace is effective if your wide men are Ronaldo and Giggs. Not so much with Young and Valencia. Whatever happened to the idea of playing to your strengths?
I definitely agree it's a case of one manager knowing his limits - Fergie hired tactically astute number 2's like McClaren, Quieroz to handle tactics and training while he dealt with inspiration and other managerial headaches off field. In the last days we lacked a great #2 and it's when our play started looking a bit crap (as it has the past few years titles aside). On the other hand Moyes has not done this, but instead brought in in yes men (Round, Lumsden and rookie Phil) - when you see games the only person he talks to is Neville (or Giggs) who is suposed to be the least experienced chap.My observation so far with Moyes is that he is putting too much emphasis on physical fitness and nowhere near enough emphasis on technical skill, The players just look exhausted after the first 15 minutes in each game........Roy Keane made a similar mistake at Sunderland by thinking you can just train twice as hard as everyone else and in that way you should be twice as good as everyone else.....it's old school mentality
Also Moyes is obviously putting way too much emphasis on crossing the ball from the wing as opposed to playing quick smart attacking passes through the middle like all other major clubs do these days simply because he has no experience of managing a team in a way that encourages them to attack with quick smart passes through the middle....we most certainly have good enough players to at least play this way against weaker teams.....
The conclusion you would have to come to with all of this is that Moyes is so deeply out of his depth that he might need inflatable arm-bands on his arms on the touchline soon......It's amazing that having Fergie's experience beside him still can not inspire him to at least at times play something other than dinosaur football
I honestly think the only thing that can save Moyes over teh summer when we finish mid table is to get on the phone to someone like Carlos Queiroz and beg him to come back and install a few innovative ideas into the training and tactical methods. Without someone like that beside taking over the training sessions and influencing the tactics then Moyes just has not got a hope.
I'm quite amazed how shockingly stunningly awful Moyes has been in terms of tactics etc....I mean we would have got more exciting hoofball football had we appointed Trapattoni as manager.......I would see Moyes sacked in a heartbeat if Klopp or someone became available over the summer as I think Moyes has done enough to merit the sack so far but of course he can turn it around but only if he appoints a modern trainer who gets the team playing in a more interesting way and where they don't look exhausted even before a ball has been kicked on match days.
to be honerst, i originally also thinkg moyes should be given time to rebuild but two things prove he is not good enough.
1) everton with the same squard (except lukaku) played better than us and
2) with the existing squard, we can only got a draw atnd lose so many games against the bottom half teams.
it shows he is not good enough. u can argue that his aging players let us down but we should have enough fire power to outscore those bottom clubs while being a good manager, he should be able to manage them to play better. and in fact, apart from evra and vidic, i dont think our squard would play so badly for the reason of age.
1.RAWK is a top football forum with many articulate contributors who support their team through thick and thin. So I take that as a compliment.
2.Many of our fans have been complaining about lack of creativity in our side. Yesterday we had Young, Rooney, Mata and RVP playing and we created 81 goal scoring opportunities. We were unlucky not to win. Fulham played like Chelsea at the Camp Nou in 2012. Rene even admitted their only game plan was to try and contain us.
3. You're welcome.
I watched the game again... sigh... It's wrong to suggest that Fulham defended the same way for 90+ mins. It's also wrong to suggest that we were crossing the ball because there was no space in the middle. There was plenty of space... This is what Manchester United should aim to do more. Instead of the strikers waiting for the ball to be crossed in, they should move to the channels and open up space/create overloads. As can be seen in the first image, Van Persie moves to the left to support Evra and Young. In doing so, this opens space for Fletcher, who plays a first time pass to Van Persie (image two). Because Van Persie is in open half space, Riise doesn't know whether to track Van Persie, pressure Fletcher, or track Young (who creates a 2 v1). In the third image, Van Persie's touch is average and he should look for a cutback to Mata. I don't see any reason why we have gone from fluid football against Bayer Leverkusen and Swansea to this again!
Sorry that the images are big. I should have resized them.
The Fulham game literally blew my mind.
I've been giving Moyes the benefit of the doubt, assuming that he was playing a crossing game simply because it suited the wingers we had in the squad. Mata and future transfers would surely bring about a change in style.
Now I'm starting to worry.
Surely he will change it....right?
Because you can't - a ball in the air is affected by so many things e.g. wind, spin, other players lol. Crossing is always a low percentage game. To rely so heavily on it will always mean trouble. Also we don't have a tall striker to attack them.If we are using the wings and crossing galore tactics then why haven't our players even improved on it ? I don't think there is a single player in the current who has gotten better at long passes and crosses since the start of the season.
Surely he will change it....right?
Crossing the ball into the mixer would be a lot more fruitful if we had midfielders making runs into the box like Robson and Scholes once did but we don't have that supporting cast! We should be mixing it up Getting to the byeline and pulling it back and picking someone out is a very profitable ploy but we don't work ourselves into those positions>We're all about crossing it in from deep and hoping for the best! I can't believe we'll persist with this tactic and I hope that eventually we'll evolve our game with the improvements we'll surely make in summer.I am hoping more than expecting but we'll see eh!
I wonder what we should do here...put it wide or give it to Rooney in all that space?
Because you can't - a ball in the air is affected by so many things e.g. wind, spin, other players lol. Crossing is always a low percentage game. To rely so heavily on it will always mean trouble. Also we don't have a tall striker to attack them.
Two midfielders have said that they are required to play a holding role, which explains why there's no attack down the center or other support for Rooney/Mata/whoever is playing behind RVP. Given Fergie's rejection of holding midfielders (http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-F...guson-will-not-sign-a-holding-midfielder.aspx), why does Moyes insist on playing two? Every midfielder United had under Fergie got involved going forward, but on Sunday, Carrick almost had to be invited to do more than pass wide. When he did, we had our first real goal-scoring chance and then later a goal.
If they aren't going to bother helping attack and only attempt to keep possession, is it any wonder that we've been inept going forward and one dimensional? They certainly haven't helped protect the back line.
This nonsense again.
In the interview where Fletcher said the role of CMs at United was to be very disciplined defensively and let the front four get forward and create he referred to "the last few years" (direct quote).
This is not some new tactic, introduced by Moyes, no matter how badly some of ye would like it to be.
Really? For the love of god, do explain.I genuinely have no idea how people can type out posts that say:
"we shouldn't play a 4-4-2, we should play a 4-2-3-1 with Rooney in the hole'
Just think about what you are saying for the love of god, they're the same thing.
he's saying rooney already plays in the hole, which is trueReally? For the love of god, do explain.
I'm with you. This game was the first time we had enough of the ball to do whatever we wanted, and we were too 1D.The Fulham game literally blew my mind.
I've been giving Moyes the benefit of the doubt, assuming that he was playing a crossing game simply because it suited the wingers we had in the squad. Mata and future transfers would surely bring about a change in style.
Now I'm starting to worry.
Surely he will change it....right?
Which is what I meant when I said 'the 4231 he wants to play' but he just decided to go all tactical wizard on me rather than reading the post.he's saying rooney already plays in the hole, which is true
I think what people really mean to say is they want our widest attacking players tucking in more, and more focus to be on passing through the centre.
Fletcher didn't train or play last season. Besides, he isn't going to come out and say "Moyes has us playing more defensively," is he? Cleverley has said this season that thew new manager requires them to play a more holding role. United's midfield never sat as deep under Fergie.
Besides, he isn't going to come out and say "Moyes has us playing more defensively," is he? Cleverley has said this season that thew new manager requires them to play a more holding role.
I wonder what we should do here...put it wide or give it to Rooney in all that space?
Not sure, with two defending players behind him ready to come after the ball while he receives it, it's a lower percentage ball than a cross, imho, because for it to be a successful pass relies on Rooney to come to the ball rather than wait for it.