Starting to have doubts about him to be honest. I hope he can prove me wrong!
Schmeichel had dodgy games in his first season. Believe!
Starting to have doubts about him to be honest. I hope he can prove me wrong!
Isn't it too important a season for us to be bedding someone in?
Why is this season more important than any other?
Don't you think Ferguson will be very reluctant to let City win the title over United?
I'd say the fact City have emerged as our main rivals this year - and are now possibly favourites - makes this season and our ability to be competitive very important.
City are only going to get stronger. They will win the title in the next fee years. Which is why we need to bed in the young players now so that we've got top young players there to put it up to them.
City are only going to get stronger. They will win the title in the next fee years. Which is why we need to bed in the young players now so that we've got top young players there to put it up to them.
Don't you think Ferguson will be very reluctant to let City win the title over United?
I'd say the fact City have emerged as our main rivals this year - and are now possibly favourites - makes this season and our ability to be competitive very important.
I'm guessing United won't just pay £20,000,000 on a whim without doing their research, but at times it seems his positioning, his decision making & his performance during a corner-kick are not just a bit bad/naive, they seem truly awful (David Luiz/CB-esque). I'd say his best attributes are his reflexes and his delivery, and at 20 years old of course he can improve, but I'm not sure of his capacity to improve, and I don't see a way of how to gauge it, so it worries me but of course time will tell and I hope he does well.
When the chips are down, I also worry that he isn't huge enough, and that because he is Spanish he is unlikely to stay with us for an entire career, although those worries are kind of unfounded and come out of insecurities after a bad result!
SAF would be reluctant to see any team win the title. Anyway, no one could have predicted City would have been in such fabulous form at the start of season. With all the injury issues I salute the club for such a fantastic start. We'd only be 3 points behind City if they win the game in hand.
Exactly, I think it's very harsh to say De Gea's not good enough at the moment, I'd agree with those who think he's not suited to the English game as of yet but for me we've seen enough of his talents already to know he's a good investment.
I don't see why City winning is a given. If we'd had more luck with injuries I think we'd have been strong favourites this year, with a squad that will improve.
I agree that bedding in good youngsters now is sound future planning but I just think being solely reliant on two very inexperienced keepers at the same time is odd decision making for a club like United when it could easily have been avoided.
If the post-Shmeicel era has told us anything, finding a keeper with the right temprament/ability for United is anything but "easily" done.
Come on, every season now is potentially SAF's last - there's no way he wants to stand down having just handed the balance of power to Manchester City. He'll want to fight like hell in the seasons he's got left - which is why I said this season is too important to have to spend so much energy bedding in a goalkeeper who has looked quite some distance out of his depth.
You kind of contradict yourself there by describing him as a good investment but railing against those who say he's not good enough now. An investment suggests he'll show his worth in the future. You also admit he's 'not suited to the English game as of yet'...
I said we could have 'easily' avoided a situation where our two frontline goalkeepers are both new to the Premier League. It leaves United in an oddly vulnerable state (which I'm sure will improve) that could have been avoided...
Every pundit in the World reckon we have a future Spanish international.
Do you think we would have been better off with Lindegaard in goal today?
Do you think we would have been better off with Lindegaard in goal today?
Why do people keep saying he's 20? Why do they say he's 6'4"?
I have a bad feeling about this.
Hindsight
Doesn't that cast doubt onto who our Nr 1 is currently though?
Who would you play in our next game? Would you make someone the clear Nr 1 for the rest of the season?
I hope he has strong mental strength to cope with all this. No matter how talented he is, i fear he may be out of England in a couple of years if it continues like this
Although not addressed to me I definitely think Lindegaard should have got the nod but hindsight has played a role in that, SAF's at fault for me, he's not allowing either of them to get into rhythm.
He shouldn't have been played in this game, simple as that. Give his current weaknesses - dealing with physicality, commanding the defenders (due to the language barrier) - this was a pretty poor game to bring him in for.
I'm of the opinion he'll still go on to be world class.
Throwing him in behind our 918457th choice defence isn't going to help much either
He is only 20. He isn't good enough currently, but he was clearly purchased with an eye on the future.
He's a very young kid in a foreign country. Lets give him a season or more before coming to any conclusion.