Agreed.It's a fee that Liverpool are in a position to risk.
He's probably going to be a top player but United's needs right now are to fix the fundamentals, priced at that we would just end up with holes in the squad again.
Could you give an example of a realistic transfer target we could've bought that would have seen us win that battle?Wow. For that price I’m glad he’s someone’s else’s problem, he needs a ton of work to get up to premier league standard, I think Liverpool fans are in for a bit of a shock once they see him trying to control balls into his feet under pressure,
if this is Liverpools answer to Haaland, I think it’s fair to assume city have won that particular battle
You still don’t get it. The point I showed you that one game to show you that Klopp‘s system can still work without winning more possession. There is a reason why people call Klopp and Pep play different style, otherwise if it’s possession based team, both would have been considered playing the same style.One game shows they’re not a possession team? They dominate possession in 95% of games they play. And they won that game due to a dodgy penalty in the first minute, hardly a great advert for them.
yeah he’s played against them already at anfield and scored. I think they know what they’re getting.Wow. For that price I’m glad he’s someone’s else’s problem, he needs a ton of work to get up to premier league standard, I think Liverpool fans are in for a bit of a shock once they see him trying to control balls into his feet under pressure,
if this is Liverpools answer to Haaland, I think it’s fair to assume city have won that particular battle
Amazing how Klopp has challenged City given he’s only been able to spend €100m on Nunez, €45-60m on Diaz and €40m on Konate in the last 12 months. How does he do it? Jenius.
I'm just going to watch this on repeat and pretend we dodged a bullet!
Whether it can work without possession doesn’t matter. They dominate possession in nearly every game they play and that’s the team Nunez is joining. Unless you think they’re going to be completely different next season and start playing on the counter.You still don’t get it. The point I showed you that one game to show you that Klopp‘s system can still work without winning more possession. There is a reason why people call Klopp and Pep play different style, otherwise if it’s possession based team, both would have been considered playing the same style.
That’s not what I’m referring to.If you look at the Mane threads from 2015 when it looked like you might be signing, they were full of moans about him not being good enough:
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/southampton-forward-sadio-mane.408256/
And that's just the tip of the iceberg. A couple who'd rather sign Berahino. Only one poster, @Celestiale, who actually dared suggest that he was better than Pedro.
I liked the name though.
Imagine all the fecking Darwin jokes in the matchday threads we could have had
So the point still stands that Nunez joins Liverpool doesn’t change their style of play but he suits Klopp style of play, their system will still work with Nunez in their team. So I don’t know what you are arguing about Nunez to Liverpool here.Whether it can work without possession doesn’t matter. They dominate possession in nearly every game they play and that’s the team Nunez is joining. Unless you think they’re going to be completely different next season and start playing on the counter.
Manchester keeping them off their fecking perch.Wow. For that price I’m glad he’s someone’s else’s problem, he needs a ton of work to get up to premier league standard, I think Liverpool fans are in for a bit of a shock once they see him trying to control balls into his feet under pressure,
if this is Liverpools answer to Haaland, I think it’s fair to assume city have won that particular battle
What? You said he would suit Liverpool more than a possession based team. He’s joining a team that dominates possession. I’m not sure what you’re getting at. Yes, they can make it work without dominating possession, but they’re not going to change that. He’s still joining a team that’s going to have 60% of the ball.So the point still stands that Nunez joins Liverpool doesn’t change their style of play but he suits Klopp style of play. So I don’t know what you are arguing about Nunez to Liverpool here.
I mean you could do that with someone from the youth teams, so not sure why you spending so much for that...Can't wait for him to hand Shaw, Maguire, AWB their arses and then garnish them with his own awards.
(punchline not needed?)
We have not signed anyone above £40m since the summer of 2018 when we bought Alisson and Keita. That's four years ago. In that same timeframe, City has gone over £60m for Cancelo, Diaz and Grealish alone.Amazing how Klopp has challenged City given he’s only been able to spend €100m on Nunez, €45-60m on Diaz and €40m on Konate in the last 12 months. How does he do it? Jenius.
Who is SS?
It's a bit of a weird one with Jota and what we're asking from the centre forward now.
Formerly, we had Firmino in the centre doing all sorts of klopp-critical stuff that justified him not scoring that many goals.
Then Jota displaces him by scoring goals, making runs and being a threat in the box but doing very little of the work on and off the ball that Firmino would get through.
And now we're at a point where Jota doesn't really have the allround game to play wide for us and we stick him in the centre to at least get on the end of things.
Honestly reckon Jota will either get found out or stick around as a Javier Hernández type of player. He doesn't have enough about him outside of goals to justify a starting place.
What? You said he would suit Liverpool more than a possession based team. He’s joining a team that dominates possession. I’m not sure what you’re getting at. Yes, they can make it work without dominating possession, but they’re not going to change that. He’s still joining a team that’s going to have 60% of the ball.
Salah | Mane | Sterling | Foden | Mahrez | |
Passing accuracy % | 79.9 | 77.3 | 85.4 | 87.4 | 90 |
To be fair, it does show though. One league title for you guys in that time frame and three for them.We have not signed anyone above £40m since the summer of 2018 when we bought Alisson and Keita. That's four years ago. In that same timeframe, City has gone over £60m for Cancelo, Diaz and Grealish alone.
The crazy fees for Alisson, Keita, Van Dijk, ... were just Coutinho money we re-invested. Since then we have been quite modest with our transfer fees, let's not pretend like €40m is anything spectacular in these times, that's almost what Everton throws away for average players each season (Sigurdsson £45m, Richarlison £40m, Iwobi £34m, Godfrey (who?) £25m, ...)
Well yeah of course, but some people make it up like €40m is a lot nowadays while in a lot of cases it's actually the bare minimum to attract a talented player, let alone an established one.To be fair, it does show though. One league title for you guys in that time frame and three for them.
Why are you Liverpool fans ashamed of your spending? It is always some excuses. But but net spend, but but City, but but United, but but salary...Well yeah of course, but some people make it up like €40m is a lot nowadays while in a lot of cases it's actually the bare minimum to attract a talented player, let alone an established one.
Transfer fees only don't tell the whole tale either. Should Nunez join us, he would earn a third of what Haaland is earning at City per week.