MiceOnMeth
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2014
- Messages
- 2,648
Still only 25 next season. Could be a Drogba or a Vardy and peak late nearer to 30.
Darwin was recruited by the coaching staff after seeing him against them in CL though
10 Players With Worst Big-Chance Conversion Rates in Europe in 23/24 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Rank | Player | Club | Conversion Rate |
1. | Darwin Nunez | Liverpool | 19.4% |
2. | Dusan Vlahovic | Juventus | 21.7% |
3. | Akor Adams | Montpellier | 26.1% |
4. | Nicolas Jackson | Chelsea | 29.2% |
5. | Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang | Marseille | 32.1% |
6. | Robert Lewandowski | Barcelona | 33.3% |
7. | Samuel Omorodion | Deportivo Alaves | 33.3% |
8. | Alvaro Morata | Atletico Madrid | 34.4% |
9. | Erling Haaland | Manchester City | 34.8% |
10. | Vinicius Jr | Real Madrid | 36.4% |
The lesson is you have highly paid professionals whose job it is to scout and recruit, and you should not trust your coaching staff over them when it comes to itYup. Sometimes you win…
Some interesting names in the top 10 worst big chance converters. You'd kind of expect it it be the 10 worst strikers in Europe but that's definitely not the case.
10 Players With Worst Big-Chance Conversion Rates in Europe in 23/24 Rank Player Club Conversion Rate 1. Darwin Nunez Liverpool 19.4% 2. Dusan Vlahovic Juventus 21.7% 3. Akor Adams Montpellier 26.1% 4. Nicolas Jackson Chelsea 29.2% 5. Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang Marseille 32.1% 6. Robert Lewandowski Barcelona 33.3% 7. Samuel Omorodion Deportivo Alaves 33.3% 8. Alvaro Morata Atletico Madrid 34.4% 9. Erling Haaland Manchester City 34.8% 10. Vinicius Jr Real Madrid 36.4%
The reason you see big names is largely because one of the most important quality for top forwards is the ability to put themselves in good goalscoring opportunities. They give themselves more chances but they are not actually more clinical, with some exceptions.
That said, I do think there is something fundamentally wrong with Nunez in front of goal. The way he keeps making a balls of huge chances in really important games is getting past the point of coincidence.
He gets into a shit ton of good positions. It is possible that they work on his finishing and he'd be an excellent striker.
They’ve been saying that for a few years and it hasn’t happened. Salah and Suarez missed a few when they started but picked up quickly. If anything he’s getting worse.
Also he gets into positions but ends up dominating his areas so more accurate players don’t get to shoot. He takes far too many shots in general - composure or an extra pass would go a long way. The opposite of Firmino, who helped others flourish.
the best game I’ve seen him play, he scammed themDarwin was recruited by the coaching staff after seeing him against them in CL though
Agreed. An erratic finisher like Nunez is never going to contribute enough as your main source of goals. He has some useful attributes as a player but as you say, I think those are better suited for someone in wider areas.I'd keep him and just play him as a wide forward. I think in that respect you can deal with his erratic nature and he can still cause 'chaos'. 31 goal contributions is very good but he doesn't have that killer instinct that top strikers do. They hugely overpaid and he's not the CF they thought would elevate them but he can still be useful for them. Keep him out wide where he can get an angled shot from through balls or outside the box which he seems to be much better at than one on ones through the middle.
Classic Darwin. Close your eyes and smash it.
Lukaku doesn't take a lot of shots though. That's a huge part of the problem with him. Darwin shoots twice as much as Lukaku averages over his careerIn other words, The Lukaku.
Feel he's having a decent year and has the skillset to do well for them. Carragher is just so unobjective when he's emotional because Klopp's farewell tour has been a disaster, their recruitment has been a bit whack which is probably why they broght Edwards back in.
They had Mane - Firmino - Salah as a front three and now have a lot of 'ok' to 'good' players in Gakpo (average), Diaz (good), Jota (good), Nunez (good) and Salah who is elite but older and likely leaving. Of all of them Nunez is the only one I'd say with any kind of real potential promise given his age and having a few more years to build on until he hits his peak.
Sometimes it seems, you walk alone.
Some interesting names in the top 10 worst big chance converters. You'd kind of expect it it be the 10 worst strikers in Europe but that's definitely not the case.
10 Players With Worst Big-Chance Conversion Rates in Europe in 23/24 Rank Player Club Conversion Rate 1. Darwin Nunez Liverpool 19.4% 2. Dusan Vlahovic Juventus 21.7% 3. Akor Adams Montpellier 26.1% 4. Nicolas Jackson Chelsea 29.2% 5. Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang Marseille 32.1% 6. Robert Lewandowski Barcelona 33.3% 7. Samuel Omorodion Deportivo Alaves 33.3% 8. Alvaro Morata Atletico Madrid 34.4% 9. Erling Haaland Manchester City 34.8% 10. Vinicius Jr Real Madrid 36.4%
100 percent. Creating top chances is harder and more important than being particularly clinical.The reason you see big names is largely because one of the most important quality for top forwards is the ability to put themselves in good goalscoring opportunities. They give themselves more chances but they are not actually more clinical, with some exceptions.
The difference between 1 in 3 and 1 in 5 is gigantic though. It’s always been the case that those who score most, miss most. Goal scoring is very hard.
Having said that, Jackson’s percentage doesn’t appear anything like as bad as I’d have thought. I’d have had him alongside Nunez based on watching him.
I‘d have him at United ….there I said it!
Ability to get on the end of the things is just as important as pure finishing ability. Which is the problem some people are seeing with Hojlund, good finisher but concerning that he struggles so badly to get shots off, even with sup optimal service.
So would I.
It's not clicking for him at Liverpool, but there's something there with Nunez. I don't think he's a number 9 though.
I think there's a good player in there as well. If your issue as a young(ish) forward is finishing but you're getting loads of chances, it's a good problem to have.I‘d have him at United ….there I said it!
I think there's a good player in there as well. If your issue as a young(ish) forward is finishing but you're getting loads of chances, it's a good problem to have.
There’s been many balls put across the goal that he’s not there forWith Hojland it’s that we don’t create any opportunity for him to even attempt one touch finishes.
I remember 28 of Haalands first 33 goals for City were one touch. They carve out so many opportunities for him to shoot first time as so much work has been done to create the chance. I don’t know what the stats are, but I’d imagine his 2-3 touch goal percentages are close to someone like Hojland. They’re both finishers and only one of them gets good service. It’s so rare to see Hojland miss a proper chance. He’s always got defenders around him. Part of that will be movement, but I still think it’s more about chance creation.
As a squad player, sure. Nothing more than that.So would I.
It's not clicking for him at Liverpool, but there's something there with Nunez. I don't think he's a number 9 though.
There’s been many balls put across the goal that he’s not there for