What is it about Gibson that makes normally sensibly people talk pish?
Er... the fact that normally sensible people can recognise that he's not all that?
Alright, I don't post often enough for my views to be 'backed up' with my history and whatever else... forgive me if I have a life outside the Internet - or is the cool term "The Internetz... lolz' these days? I can never keep up.
As someone said earlier, I'll support any player who pulls on that shirt for 90 mins. For 90 mins. Period. The last time I remember posting is when you started a thread about Fergie's big bollocks (after the Valencia away game) and I thought it was knee-jerk and (AFAIR) R_Nick or Feed Me or one of those two (again, forgive me for not getting on here enough to tell compulsive posters apart - although I can tell Boss and Brad ~ Cantona apart) thought I was posting anti-Fergie stuff. So enough of the armchair Top Redding. Which maybe unfair to the likes of Datura, Prateik and Samabachan, sorry you fellas.
The question is - is Darron Gibson good enough to take up a squad space
in light of the regulated restrictions?
I don't think he is. And while all's well supporting SAF's decisions, thee's no reason to think the man is infallible or ever has been. (If he were, this site would simply be a piece of arse-licking. Glad it ain't so.)
For me, the first objection to Gibson starting a(n) important or decisive game is that he doesn't play 'the Man United way.' I.e. quick passing, movement, getting into positions. Yes Ronaldo (7) didn't exactly epitomise the team instructions either, but he was special. And Gibbo needs t prove he is
that to be playing his own game
most of the time. Yes, good assist for the goal, but the question in this thread at least, is whether he does that consistently enough to be regarded as a future star. (As say, Beckham at 12 and Giggs at 13 or 14 were, at least enough to be recognised as such by the likes of Sirs Bobby and Alex).
I would love for Gibson to nail a spot in the XI or XIV (however many you could reasonably count as 'first-teamers' ) purely because he's homegrown, but then again if (and recognising ythe fact that we have a fair few players of that ilk out for whatever reason) it isn't exactly wildly unreasonable to say he doesn't look like one of those. Even if ATM.