kouroux
45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
I wonder if all those "shoot!!!" from the crowd play on his mind when instead of having a crack he could try something else
He is also no where near as bad as so many try to make out either.
We all can see it, but still he's allowed to do the same over and over. He's good at it, and obviously SAF have seen enough to let him do it a lot of the time whenever he plays.I wonder if all those "shoot!!!" from the crowd play on his mind when instead of having a crack he could try something else
There are some exceptions of course. Cesc is one, Rooney is another, same with Messi, and even Ronaldo probably, Giggs etc who you knew had it from a very young age and would be able to perform well consistently right from the start. But most players take longer to have that confidence and belief in their ability to show it consistently especially playing for a top club.I think this is wrong, the word generally mature should not be used... it's really up to the styles of play from the footballer and the team he is in...
Was Lampard really super good for Westham playing 4-4-2 ? I thought he lacked discipline and he didn't really look outstanding but his shooting tecnique was always there and once he moved to Chelsea it really shined.
Fabregas to me, was just superb at the age of 18, he's still only 23 now but plays like a Xavi already...
Not to mention Wilshere who is 18 but damn, looks so mature... But I mean Arsenal is Arsenal, however they play they will always have a MF that will make them flow... Denilson looked bad but he was actually decent in most games I've seen, Flamini ? Viera ? Gilberto Silva ? Who actually failed at Arsenal ? Lass ? he just wanted to play and was a wuss complaining every time...
As a United player, of course Scholes has spoilt us for like 15 years as his passing has been ever so phenomenal since i ever started to watch United...
Gibson for me has all the chances to succeed, given the luck and hopes he continuously improves his game... His movment, his passing, his understanding... If he doesn't I'm sure if he gets the right move, gets a good team and if they possibly play 4-3-3, I'm sure Gibson will be a MF who consistently Scores 10 goals a season.
I am amused by the comparisons of Gibson with Lampard. Lampard, Chelsea scum though he is, is so much a better and more effective player than Gibson is, and ever will be.
I accept Gibson has a hard shot, but how many of his shots were on target against Rangers? In contrast, Lampard often scuffs his shots and they STILL go in. In any event, Lampard is better than Gibson.
I'm not a big fan of Gibson, but some of you lot are massive Ihni binni dimi diniwiny anitaime. He was one of our better players in the Rangers game, and all you could moan was inept he was when established players like Wayne Rooney was having a rubbish night.
I don't blame him, but I don't understand why he keeps getting played in a position he simply can't play.
Especially times like today when we had someone who CAN play that position stuck out on the wing and then subbed off, just to accomodate him.
Why deliberately weaken yourselves as a team like that?...stupid
We should wait another 5 years for him to become the next Xavi. Meanwhile City with their billions and spuds who have found their balls and given their bottle to us will have over taken us. Good plan.
He can only play in a 3 man midfield. He is not mobile enough to get around the pitch in a two man midfield.
Edit: Why are some words auto-censored on Redcafe?
I just asked him if any of the squad were caftards
phelans just ruined any chance he had of pulling Georgie Thompson in the next half an hour. I'm still in the game