It could be argued that they do.
It could also be argued they don't.
Then again, it could be argued they do.
It could be argued that they do.
Take a look below and I quote people who agree. I am not a joke. I at least discuss football in a football forum, you do not really post anything useful or anything about football.
Kiko is an embarressment to be honest. I really hope we get rid of him. He isnt that good either.
I actually hope he does fail. Probably the first time I have felt this way. Horrible attitude.
Would hate to see him in our first team permanently. I cant stand the sight of him.
And also, hes invisible every match I watch him. He is a natural goalscorer, but his all round play is hurrendous.
Gibson plays in the middle, Cleverley out wide.. same position indeed.
Yeah, sure.
Saying Gibson and Cleverley play the same position is as incorrect as saying that Carrick and Park play the same position.
The only similarity is that they all play in midfield.
Pretty daft use of that smilie, what with Gibson playing in the centre and Cleverley out wide.
Unless you want to remind us all of the last game Cleverley played in central midfield, for United or for Watford?
He'll never be a first team 30+ game a season midfielder at our club. Although he is still a handy squad player to have.
I reckon he will turn out to be like Brown and O'Shea. He'll flirt with the first team often enough but he will never make the position his own. Not every player is good enough to cement a place in the United first team, very few infact, however that does not mean we offload him.
Saying Gibson and Cleverley play the same position is as incorrect as saying that Carrick and Park play the same position.
The only similarity is that they all play in midfield.
He played a full hour alongside Scholes in a midfield two against Kansas, didn't he? Sure Giggs tucked in a lot, but he played quite a disciplined role in there and played it reasonably well, I thought.
Anyway, on Gibson, anyone else impressed by his passing against the Irish XI? Obviously the opposition was poor but that's not all that important when you're talking about passing ability/technique, he showed the talent's there pinging passes about, it's just the application at the top level's still not quite there yet.
Still, thought it might've surprised a few of the Gibson critics.
Apart from his shooting which is very on and off, he doesn't have any stand out qualities or attributes that you think he might need. He just seems to be a very basic player with no hint of gaining much improvement.
People forget he is 23, he is not exactly a youngster, but peoplle still include him in the same bracket as Macheda, Welbeck, Cleverly who are all 20 or under. I doubut these lads will be at the point Gibson is at now when they reach his age.
Sir Alex said:If I were to give Darron, and I hope I can say this, 20 odd games, he's gonna get me 10 goals, easily, and that would be a big contribution for him. Without question, he's got the ability to be a top player that lad. He's got the engine, he's got the power, he's got the physique, he's got the shooting ability from outside the box when not every player in the game has got that, either foot, and he's improving all the time.
Video here.Sir Alex said:If I were to give Darron, and I hope I can say this, 20 odd games, he's gonna get me 10 goals, easily, and that would be a big contribution for him. Without question, he's got the ability to be a top player that lad. He's got the engine, he's got the power, he's got the physique, he's got the shooting ability from outside the box when not every player in the game has got that, either foot, and he's improving all the time.
The Godfather has spoken. Darren is a new capoVideo here.
Fantastic pass for Valencia for his goal.
Yeah, it was perfectly weighted.
Unfortunately, it probably won't stop the ongoing bullshit that he has absolutely nothing to his game other than a powerful shot.
I agree. Everyone forgets he is getting far less games to iron out his weaknesses than the likes of Fletcher got.I do wonder what game people watch or what they chose to see from what they watch when they spout shite about Gibson in, for example, a game where he'll put in a number of good passes, both long and short, and work himself into space to actually take a crack at goal, which is well within his right and is expected of him by management.
He looks like a player who is still finding his feet in the side and is trying to fit in without stepping on the toes of those higher up the chain to me.
He's a diamond in the rough.
There's no denying he can be sluggish and/or a plodder at times, but most of his issues don't seem to be technical, and surely it's easier to work on fitness, aggression and awareness than it is on players who have those things but lack technical ability.
Gibson gets an incredibly raw deal from the fans for the most part.
I agree. Everyone forgets he is getting far less games to iron out his weaknesses than the likes of Fletcher got.
True.Very true. And he also has to play in a 4-4-2 a lot more than Fletcher did when he was coming up and we used a 4-5-1. Mistakes are amplified in a 4-4-2, Gibson hasn't looked out of place at all when we've used 4-3-3's or a 4-5-1.
Darron is a made man. If SAF thinks this way about him, then I say feck you all who think he does not offer much(With the maximum respect).
p.s. I see SAF uses his first name to call him and some of you gets into fits when foreigners call the players by their first names