Then your memory must be absolutely fecking diabolical.
I am waiting for you to give me few examples...
Then your memory must be absolutely fecking diabolical.
I am waiting for you to give me few examples...
Leverkusen away and home in the group stages. City away this season Rooney was basically the only one on the pitch for United that you could say performed well.
He's quite obviously world class, shouldn't be up for debate. He's been world class ever since he started playing football ffs.
City away last season Rooney scored a brace as well.
Leverkusen is top class team? City away he was average, but best of the bunch, far from world class performance. If that was World Class performance than Welbeck was out of this world against them at Old Trafford, and Dzeko was Messi.
Rubbish, rooney in the 09/10 season matched van persie last season.I'll give you that, it was actually good performance from him.
Just to be clear, I don't think he is shit in big games, his consistency is actually better in big games, but his top level is far from world's best players. For example, van Persie's 3/4 of the season last year were on higher level than Rooney played probably ever for us.
Bit lazy of you not to make any effort to think back yourself tbh. This season's a funny one because the whole team has been so shite against the best opposition it's been hard for any individual to excel. Rooney was excellent when we put Leverkusen to the sword though.
If you're prepared to put in the effort to cast your mind waaaaaaay back to last season, you can take your pick of good performances against tough opposition in the PL. For Cl you'll need to go back another couple of seasons (if you can cope?) because Madrid were the only decent side we played in 2012/13 and we didn't get out of our group the season before. In 2010/11 Rooney consistently excelled in the CL, creating or scoring in every round of the competition, right the way through to the final.
In fact, one of the defining aspects of Rooney's career at Manchester United is his ability to put in big performances (usually including goals) in big games. Absolutely mental for these performances to have somehow slipped your memory. Mental or terminally biased. Either way your opinions on Rooney are probably best ignored.
It depends what you'd call World Class. If I were making 5 first XI's consisting of the World's best player's he would not be in either of them. I'm not sure he'd be in the 6th either. This isn't because he isn't one of the best 55 player's in the world. It's because he isn't better than 5-6 other player's in any position. This is Rooney's biggest problem, he doesn't really have a position which compliments all his attributes, which means that he doesn't look 100% comfortable in any position unless he's playing brilliantly, whereby he can look incredible in every position.
As a number 9 I'd have RVP, Messi, Ronaldo, Suarez, Ibrahimovic and Aguero ahead of him at a minimum (with Neymar/Falcao/Lewandowski at a similar level)
As a number 10 I'd have Mata, Ozil, Iniesta, Gotze, Silva, as well as possibly Oscar/Hazard ahead of him.
That's before mixing players that are arguably better in both positions (Suarez, Messi, Ronaldo, Ibrahimovich).
Personally I believe Rooney is such a well rounded player that he is actually very good in almost every position. He excels as a striker, behind the striker and coming from the left (and presumably the right). He would also make a very competent central midfielder. Unfortunately this unrivaled versatility means that he doesn't meet my criteria for World Class.
Not sure about since he ever started, but he's definitely world class for me.He's quite obviously world class, shouldn't be up for debate. He's been world class ever since he started playing football ffs.
He's better than the strikers playing at half those clubs.Nope, but that he isn't amongst the best strikers in the world anymore and that he would be hard pressed to fit into teams like:
Bayern
City
Barcelona
Real
Athletico
PSG
And you might even throw in Liverpool on current form. He would play regularly for Chelsea though.
Did you just discount Leverkusen because they are not a top class team, but then cite Basel?As I said, Leverkusen is far from top class team. And he wasn't probably our best player against them too, but even if he was, that was one of our easiest games this season.
Madrid is nice example, I don't know why are you ignoring it? Because he played out of position probably? Isn't that down to his form or because one of the greatest managers of all time thought he isn't good enough to play in the middle against them, or actually start in the second game at all.
And year before, he was actually very poor against Basel away, in game where Nani was our best player of the night by a mile?(should I say Nani is still one of the best wingers in the world because of that)
Season before he actually had good game against Barca, but from what I remember he totally ignored his job of marking Busquets(I am not denying he had a good game, but that's one of the reasons Fergie didn't trust him against Madrid probably), and that year our attack was far from great, our defence carried us through the whole campaign.
As I said in some of my previous posts, I am not saying he is choker or flat track bully, his performances in big games are actually more consistent than against weaker opponents, but I don't think they are on such a high level at all.
They aren't a world class team but 5-0 away in the Champions League is a pretty nice result. This is such a loaded and bogus question considering our entire squad has been shit against the best teams we've played this season save last week against Munich. Rooney's record in big matches over the course of his career is something that even most of his critics wouldn't question.
Did you just discount Leverkusen because they are not a top class team, but then cite Basel?
Nah, we were awful against Bayern too. It's was just okay in the context of how awful we've been.
Have we parked the bus at home vs Bayern last year under Fergie and drawn 1-1 at home it would have been considered a bafflingly bad result/performance.
The game that springs to my mind in the "Rooney: Big Game Player" debate is always one from a good few years ago now, when we went out to Bayern Munich (again) and Rooney played despite having some kind of a metatarsal or ankle injury... he was absolutely immense for the early part of that game before they put it out of our reach and it just wasnt enough. Still, that game cast into full view just how utterly reliant on him we were at that time - and what a big game player he was (and is).
Then you need to reassess your criteria. Versatility is a strength, not a weakness. It's one of the main reasons Rooney is so highly thought off by opposition players and managers.
The game that springs to my mind in the "Rooney: Big Game Player" debate is always one from a good few years ago now, when we went out to Bayern Munich (again) and Rooney played despite having some kind of a metatarsal or ankle injury... he was absolutely immense for the early part of that game before they put it out of our reach and it just wasnt enough. Still, that game cast into full view just how utterly reliant on him we were at that time - and what a big game player he was (and is).
People should also look at how well he actually plays in the 90 minutes of football actually played on the pitch.
When people talk about Rooney being world class they go on and on about his versatility, how well rounded he is and all this other stuff but the performances he actually puts out on the pitch this season and last season are nowhere near world class level and that is what matters. Not a bunch of skills and attributes he theoretically has and is theoretically good at.
There's a really good reason why Sir Alex was considering getting rid and it's because on the pitch week in week out he's not actually that good. He has his moments and games no doubt but he hasn't consistently played at a world class level in years.
World class is what Suarez is doing right now, it's what Messi and Ronaldo do every season or what Bale did last season. World class players make the difference game after game after game. Rooney doesn't do that, he has as many bad games as good and his real world class level games are few and far between.
A reasonable starting point is to compare his goals and assists to everyone else in the five major European leagues since 2006-07 – the season Lionel Messi established himself at Barcelona and Cristiano Ronaldo first scored more than 10 Premier League goals. On that measure, Rooney is the sixth highest goalscorer across the Premier League, La Liga, Serie A, Bundesliga and Ligue 1 with 129 goals. Only Ronaldo (258), Messi (240), Zlatan Ibrahimovic (170), Antonio Di Natale (154) and Mario Gómez (135) have scored more. David Villa, Edinson Cavani, Sergio Agüero and Gonzalo Higuaín are all in Rooney's slipstream.
What about assists? Again Rooney makes the top 10.
He is eighth with 66 – only Messi and Cesc Fábregas (91 each), Mesut Özil (86), Daniel Alves (78), Franck Ribéry (75), Ronaldo (68) and Xavi (67) have more.
Then you need to reassess your criteria. Versatility is a strength, not a weakness. It's one of the main reasons Rooney is so highly thought off by opposition players and managers.
Again, crap.
Without getting into the whole tedious "what is world class" debate you can't just single out the two (now three) best players on the planet right now (two of whom will have a decent claim to be the best ever) and try to argue that anyone who doesn't meet those standards is not world class.
Remains to be seen if Suarez will keep up this season's form or if he's having a similar season to the one where Rooney racked up almost a goal a game in the league.
You need to take a step back and look at the bigger picture. Here's a quote from a piece by Sean Ingle in the Grauniad comparing him with strikers across Europe:
Those stats speak for themselves, even though they ignore arguably his best assets; his workrate, commitment to the cause and ability to play in a number of different positions (which he has done throughout the time period being assessed)
I'm not arguing that Rooney is a bad player. I'm saying that this season and last he hasn't performed at the elite level you need to be a world class forward. His goal record for example is 33 goals in 74 games. That's alright, but world class?
It's not like he's some assist machine either who spends the game playing defence splitters, he's a good passer of the ball but you only need to watch Mata's performances for us behind Rooney to see the difference when you have a top level passer of the ball in that position.
Dant's comments about Rooney being world class led me to think of two possible scenarios regarding our debated player.
1. He truly is world class, and the players who keep on mentioning him alongside the very best of players see something that a lot of fans, me included, fail to see.
2. The players who comment on him don't know much about him other than his reputation. The thing that led me to this is Dante's comment that he is very quick on the first few yards. Really, he isn't anymore. Rooney was once very quick, not that much slower than Ronaldo really, but sadly he's lost that. Do players and managers who keep mentioning Rooney as world class say that based on reputation or actual ability? Messi once said that Rooney would thrive at Barcelona because of his eminent technique, while many fans slate him for his somewhat average at best technique.
So which is it?
He's still rated as the 8th fastest player in the world though ??
http://hereisthecity.com/en-gb/2014/04/06/worlds-fastest-footballer-revealed-not-baleronaldowalcott/