Manucho the boss
New Member
We treated him like sh*t because he was one of our own and not a Jorge Mendes recommended mercenary.
We treated him like sh*t because he was one of our own and not a Jorge Mendes recommended mercenary.
That was a Spurs trait back in the day, they quickly slagged homegrown players and gave massive latitude to expensive signings. Was the other way with Man Utd or Arsenal who would support the local lads to the hilt ( and fork me sideways lots of them came through)We treated him like sh*t because he was one of our own and not a Jorge Mendes recommended mercenary.
Is this the one you're talking about? If so it wasn't Mourinho who managed Chelsea at the time.I can remember us beating them 3-1 at home a couple of years ago (I had the correct score at 28/1 and Rosicky burst through in the last minute, hit the post and nearly made it 4 - unlucky Tom!)
"Arsenal's Danny Welbeck HITS BACK at Man Utd for sticking him on the wing"
Welbeck, 23, could not resist pointing out to Van Gaal that if he is played in the central striker's role he will score goals - not like at United where he was shunted to midfield.
"Nobody can really criticise my finishing because they don't really see me playing in a forward position too often," he said.
"But now I am getting into these positions I want to be sticking the ball in the back of the net. I'm sure it's the same with every other striker.
"Obviously people can say I've not scored enough goals, but you stick the best strikers on the wing in a four-man midfield and see if they score goals."
He predicted that he will score a lot more now that he is playing in a central role for Arsenal, who have the midfield talent to supply the ammunition.
He said: "I wouldn't say I feel different now. Maybe beforehand, sometimes I wasn't getting through on goal if I was coming from a four-man midfield. Obviously it's difficult to leave your position and go and get goal-scoring opportunities.
"But I'm getting into these positions much more regularly now, and I'm looking forward to sticking the ball in the back of the net.
"If you're getting goals and getting a run of games in your preferred position, your confidence is going to grow and performances are going to grow as well. That is something I am really looking forward to doing, building on those performances.
"When I am playing with these sorts of midfield players, they are looking to slip the ball in behind. I am always ready for that, looking to make the movement right and get in behind the defenders. Tonight I did that a couple of times and scored a few goals.
"I'm looking to build an understanding with the players and getting to know them better, it's good to play with these calibre of midfielders, they are only going to create chances."
http://www.express.co.uk/sport/foot...Arsenal-news-Manchester-United-Louis-van-Gaal
Treated him like shit?We treated him like sh*t because he was one of our own and not a Jorge Mendes recommended mercenary.
We treated him like sh*t because he was one of our own and not a Jorge Mendes recommended mercenary.
It's frustrating because, in my opinion, we've had the best we'll ever get from RvP. At his age and with his injury record I think we'll have to replace him sooner rather than later. Added to the fact neither Rooney nor Falcao are especially young then it might be seen as short-sighted. Of course if Wilson trains on and take Welbeck's place it'll look okay in retrospect.
Can't really disagree with that. But you'd assume that by the time that happens he'll be well on his way and we should still be getting goals out of the strikers that are already here, so with a signing or two it might not be an issue.To a point. Wilson's still 5 years younger than Danny, has had his share of injury problems and is also a skinny length of rope. We might have had to replace all three of the most senior strikers by the time he turns the corner in the same way that Welbeck has done these last 12 months (seems to have, anyway)
He's right. The article is wrong. The comment about playing wide in a four man midfield, was more about how Moyes used him than anything aimed at Van Gaal.
Although I guess you could argue he was pointing out that Van Gaal should have taken this into account when talking about his United career so far. What I don't get is why someone like Giggs couldn't convince Van Gaal to find a way to hold onto Welbeck. Although by all accounts our new manager is a stubborn cnut, so that may not have been possible.
The comments about midfielders are damning. Such a pity he didn't get to play in front of Herrera and Di Maria. The combination of his pace with their eye for a pass would have been excellent for us.
Can't really disagree with that. But you'd assume that by the time that happens he'll be well on his way and we should still be getting goals out of the strikers that are already here, so with a signing or two it might not be an issue.
He comes across quite bitter in his interviews, he's never said a good word or a thanks to the club that pretty much made him and the constant indirect digs at our midfield.
Wayne Rooney was played in all sorts of positions including wide in a 4 man midfield, but he got on with it still scored goals and now is the captain of the club. Welbeck didn't want to hang around and try to force his way as a central striker or didn't want to go out on loan to prove his worth either. I can understand he wanted to leave which is fair enough but at the same time he didn't show any patience or will to fight for a place, especially in a time when Rooney is likely to drop deeper into midfield and RVP is coming close to no longer being a first choice.
The funny thing about this is all is when Giroud is back he will be shifted to the wing anyway.
We treated him like sh*t because he was one of our own and not a Jorge Mendes recommended mercenary.
No, he won't. We have better options there. He'll only play as a striker and right now his performances are better than anything Giroud has shown.The funny thing about this is all is when Giroud is back he will be shifted to the wing anyway.
What a load of rubbish. Fans whinge when the cub lack ambition yet when they go out and makea big statement in securing one of the worlds top players they whinge as well.
Welbeck wasn't getting a regular start even before Falcao so there's every chance he'd have wanted to move on in the near future anyway. The manager has to pick his best side and clearly he feels that that particular side wouldnt have Danny Welbeck in it.
This thread is going to be absolutely chronic. Everytime he has a half decent pefromance he'll be the enxt Thierry Henry and when he's crap it'll be a great thing we moved him on.
He's an up and down player and for me isnt likely ever to be top class in the sense that Rooney and RVP are. if he proves me wrong then so be it but he was neveer going to reach that level playing second fiddle to Rooney and RVP, both of whom are better players as things stand at a time we need to be winning gahmes first and foremost.
No, he won't. We have better options there. He'll only play as a striker and right now his performances are better than anything Giroud has shown.
Is this the one you're talking about? If so it wasn't Mourinho who managed Chelsea at the time.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_prem/9309539.stm
I actually wouldn't be surprised if Giggs was one of the approvers of selling Welbeck. Not in a malicious way but because he likely rated Wilson higher. My thinking is based in part on Giggs decision to hand out a debut to Wilson despite there being no real reason to do so.He's right. The article is wrong. The comment about playing wide in a four man midfield, was more about how Moyes used him than anything aimed at Van Gaal.
Although I guess you could argue he was pointing out that Van Gaal should have taken this into account when talking about his United career so far. What I don't get is why someone like Giggs couldn't convince Van Gaal to find a way to hold onto Welbeck. Although by all accounts our new manager is a stubborn cnut, so that may not have been possible.
The comments about midfielders are damning. Such a pity he didn't get to play in front of Herrera and Di Maria. The combination of his pace with their eye for a pass would have been excellent for us.
Interesting how you credit AVB's failure (3-5) to Mourinho.I can remember us beating them 3-1 at home a couple of years ago (I had the correct score at 28/1 and Rosicky burst through in the last minute, hit the post and nearly made it 4 - unlucky Tom!). We also done them 3-5 at the Bridge not that long ago.
Immediately regret looking in here. Welbeck fanbois by far the worst.
This must have been posted about a hundred frigging times already. This thread is just like any other. Differing opinions, with opposing camps seizing on whatever events fit their position.
Just like every other thread, in the fullness of time it will become apparent which camp was closest to the truth. This usually involves in people who have been arguing to the contrary never posting in the thread again, with a noble minority fronting up and admitting they were wrong.
It's the way of the caf. Do people really need to keep pointing it out? If this thread (or any other) bothers people they don't need to read/post in it. I've been keeping the feck out of the Pogba thread for exactly that reason.
I disagree that Van Persie is a better player as things stand fwiw. He definitely hasn't been so far this season, with a real possibility we've seen the best of him already. That might change over the next few months. I certainly hope it does. Will be excruciating to watch my suspicions be confirmed.
This must have been posted about a hundred frigging times already. This thread is just like any other. Differing opinions, with opposing camps seizing on whatever events fit their position.
Just like every other thread, in the fullness of time it will become apparent which camp was closest to the truth. This usually involves in people who have been arguing to the contrary never posting in the thread again, with a noble minority fronting up and admitting they were wrong.
It's the way of the caf. Do people really need to keep pointing it out? If this thread (or any other) bothers people they don't need to read/post in it. I've been keeping the feck out of the Pogba thread for exactly that reason.
I disagree that Van Persie is a better player as things stand fwiw. He definitely hasn't been so far this season, with a real possibility we've seen the best of him already. That might change over the next few months. I certainly hope it does. Will be excruciating to watch my suspicions be confirmed.
Absolute nonsense.He comes across quite bitter in his interviews, he's never said a good word or a thanks to the club that pretty much made him and the constant indirect digs at our midfield.
I actually wouldn't be surprised if Giggs was one of the approvers of selling Welbeck. Not in a malicious way but because he likely rated Wilson higher. My thinking is based in part on Giggs decision to hand out a debut to Wilson despite there being no real reason to do so.
Big game for Welbeck this weekend against Chelsea, I thought he disappeared against an organised Spurs team.
The funny thing about this is all is when Giroud is back he will be shifted to the wing anyway.
Giggs birth name was Wilson, from his past indiscretions I wouldn't be surprised if he's got a whole youth team of kids out there, this could be one of them?
You are so wrong.He's inferior to Demba Ba and I honestly believe that Ba would have been a better / cheaper signing for Arsenal. That's the kind of level that Welbeck is at. Owen scored a hat trick for us in the CL before, Bendtner and Mitroglu have also done the same for other clubs. Please, just stop glorifying Welbeck. He's a good player but he's not better than what we have and he's gone now. It's no great loss and time to move on.
Why?Comes across as a bit of a dick I feel.
You are so wrong.
I actually wouldn't be surprised if Giggs was one of the approvers of selling Welbeck. Not in a malicious way but because he likely rated Wilson higher. My thinking is based in part on Giggs decision to hand out a debut to Wilson despite there being no real reason to do so.
Which part was wrong? It was all factually correct.
He's inferior to Demba Ba
I believe that Ba would have been a better / cheaper signing for Arsenal.
He's a good player but he's not better than what we have and he's gone now.
It's no great loss and time to move on.
Really?
Well the parts about Mitroglu and Bendtner were indeed factually correct. He has never shown he is more than a 'good' player so nothing wrong with that. The rest is my opinion. It can't be wrong unless I get proved wrong. Lets see how the season goes for Welbeck first, eh. Then come back and call people's opinions 'wrong'. FWIW, Ba has shown far more in the PL than Welbeck ever has.