Sir A1ex
Full Member
no one has tried to defend the notion that Welbeck is a clumsy player.
I've got no interest in doing so, as he isn't. But the racism claim is ludicrous.
no one has tried to defend the notion that Welbeck is a clumsy player.
I've got no interest in doing so, as he isn't. But the racism claim is ludicrous.
Do you associate it with him? If so why?
Can't you see the tension between no-one here believing when they sit and think about it that he is a clumsy player, and his being described as a clumsy player 200 times in this thread?
I attributed that to racism, I may be right or wrong, and even if I am wrong in this case I think it is something that happens with reporting of the game in general. However I do think that there is a serious tension to answer in this case.
Am I missing something, is this a known stereotype?
The known stereotype is a attribute black players (especially Africans, doesn't seem to apply with Brazilians) with physical attributes and white players with technical and mental attributes.
It's because he has long, gangly legs - he always looks like he's a moment away from tangling them up and tripping over himself.
It's the same with Peter Crouch, it took years for people to say "he has a good touch **long pause to await the inevitable** for a big man".
Ta daaaaa, is that a viable answer Fiskey?
(especially Africans, doesn't seem to apply with Brazilians)
But Wlebeck is British - I think you're confusing stereotypes based on race with those based on nationality. We've long since been fed:
Brazilian = Attacking flare, no interest in defence
Italian = Hhigh tecnhical skill, but focus on defending
German = Low flare, technical and highly efficient
British = Low skill, blood and guts determination
Scandinavian = Strong and powerful
African = Athletic but raw / low-skilled
etc and so on.
I enjoy how the caf jumps on the bandwagon. Would anyone describe Ricky Lambert as being clumsy on the ball? I've never seen it. Is he better on the ball than Welbeck? No, he's much worse.
I just don't understand how the accusation he's clumsy on the ball can be leveled at him, without it having racist connotations. He's one of our best players with the ball at his feet, he's demonstrated this since he was in the youth team. Look at his pass completion %s and they are amongst the best in the league for a forward player. He's also a successful dribbler and carries the ball exceptionally well, even before you start talking about his ability with flicks and one touch passing around the box. Given this evidence how is he clumsy on the ball? It can only come down to appearance, and I think racism has something to do with it.
But Wlebeck is British - I think you're confusing stereotypes based on race with those based on nationality. We've long since been fed:
Brazilian = Attacking flare, no interest in defence
Italian = Hhigh tecnhical skill, but focus on defending
German = Low flare, technical and highly efficient
British = Low skill, blood and guts determination
Scandinavian = Strong and powerful
African = Athletic but raw / low-skilled
etc and so on.
It's because he has long legs and arms and thus looks a bit dangly when he runs with the ball and receives the ball. Most people agree on him having a very good technique and touch but that it can look erratic.
You think racism has something to do with it? Well, Crouch also has the exact same issue; his touch and technique may look awkward but are actually very good. Only that it applies 3x more for Crouch than for Welbeck. So unless Crouch has done a serious Michael Jackson, you are completely in the wrong.
And that is NOT the bandwagon, mate. Funny though.
Its not, its a complete myth. If it was he would be in the Stoke starting line up, rather than failing at every club he has been at apart from Southampton.
But Wlebeck is British - I think you're confusing stereotypes based on race with those based on nationality. We've long since been fed:
Brazilian = Attacking flare, no interest in defence
Italian = Hhigh tecnhical skill, but focus on defending
German = Low flare, technical and highly efficient
British = Low skill, blood and guts determination
Scandinavian = Strong and powerful
African = Athletic but raw / low-skilled
etc and so on.
Well. That extra training is fruiting so far. The team play is getting much much better.
Should doubled that extra training, if I were Moyes.
Care to share the article?If you read the article and comments from Danny and Moyes, they seem a bit odd. If you listen to Welbeck, he is saying he has ALWAYS done the extra training Rooney does practising finishing, etc. He puts Moyes comments down to him being injured and not being at United that long.
Care to share the article?
Maybe what's been said is why we're seeing him play this well.Moyes does need to become more savvy with this press thing. Indirectly saying on the press that Welbeck isn't training as hard as he should, is just not on. He might be telling the truth, but what's to gain and lose then, feeding those 'animals'?
I remember that picture, he 's running away try to avoid reporters, instead of just telling them to feck off. Seems like he's afraid of them, and feel the pressure of feeding them with something they want.
But performance on the field is all that matters right now.
Danny up front > Danny on the left.
Who knew playing people in their proper positions would mean they play better eh?