Why because I'm saying Ings is shite and not quick? I've heard it all now.
Danny Ings | Signs for Liverpool (lol)
- Thread starter #07
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) and Imran (@Annihilate Now!) are here to discuss Amad saving our blushes in a win against Southampton as well as our now annual loss at home to Brighton. They discuss Amorim's post-match comments, revisit how mid-table we may or may not be, and discuss some transfer news.
- Status
Why because I'm saying Ings is shite and not quick? I've heard it all now.
And planet earth is blue and there's nothing I can do, can you hear me.....
Bournemouth have the 5th favourite odds to sign him from the link that sun_tze linked. That is more his level. Feck a duck.
No, because you're talking bollocks.
Why because I'm saying Ings is shite and not quick? I've heard it all now.
Aye, mph means nothing when judging a players speed. When Bolt runs 9.5 seconds over 100 metres we just see he looked fast.
Look at all of his caps for England too. What is Hodgson playing at? The man can run rings around Saturn.
Danny Ings' Characteristics
+ Strengths
(Player has no significant strengths)
- Weaknesses
Passing
Weak
Aerial Duels
Weak
+ Strengths
(Player has no significant strengths)
- Weaknesses
Passing
Weak
Aerial Duels
Weak
You wanted the proof and I gave it to you, now make sure you backtrack in style, there's a good boy.
Mph means nothing, right. Must have seen a razor behind him.
Nah, I'll stick to my guns and say he isn't quick and he picked up a tow from the defender along with the wind being over 50mph to give him a boost. He is rubbish and if he ever makes a champions league appearance I'll sell my nans grave plot.
Not a good bet for you. Celtic often play in the CL.
I don't mind, my Grandmother may have something to say though. To be fair he has finally put some factual evidence to the cause, no matter if we don't use mph as a guide to someone's speed and just use our eyes 
Major Tom is on a major WUM drive.
It's like a new Charlie Adam rumor
Austin is better than Ings IMO
Lord no.
Ings wouldn't be a bad shout for an Everton, Newcastle, Swansea, Palace, West Ham or even Southampton.
Indeed, I was watching Ings up against the BFG the other week, fast he ain't.I don't mind, my Grandmother may have something to say though. To be fair he has finally put some factual evidence to the cause, no matter if we don't use hopeless stats as a guide to someone's speed and just use our eyes
Reminds me of a young Kevin Davies...
If we were going for 4 strikers, than i would probably take him as a the 4th striker, as he will improve our quota and will be free. But would like us to go with 3 strikers supplemented with forwards like Depay & Reus
If we were going for 4 strikers, than i would probably take him as a the 4th striker, as he will improve our quota and will be free. But would like us to go with 3 strikers supplemented with forwards like Depay & Reus
Last edited:
http://m.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/...or_Liverpool_switch_after_Clarets_relegation/
Hope this is true!! I am for one glad he is no where close to us
Hope this is true!! I am for one glad he is no where close to us
Good lad, hes def not good enough for title contenders, but decent player non the less.
Haven't watched that much but I did watch the last two games and I don't get the hype at all, he seems like an average player. Hope he goes to Liverpool.
I can't recall ever seeing him play.
What sort of striker is he?
What sort of striker is he?
he would be a good singing for them.....he is free, is better then Lambert/Borini and would be a good backup option. But they need a first striker, Sturridge is made of glass and Balotelli is shit.
Liverpool bound surely? I wouldn't want him anywhere near United, full stop. He's exactly the type of player you get in and quickly realise he's taking up a spot in the squad you could've filled with someone better, then look to offload him soon as possible. If we need a 4th striker I'd rather bring Chicarito back from Real.
He's not exactly a Suarez style game-changer signing that I am worried about going to Liverpool - more of a squad filler like Lambert.
Smacks of the Ricky Lambert signing.
He will probably never score 25 goals in a season - but what I like about him is his work-rate. He reminds me a bit about Tevez - but of course nowhere as skilled with the ball.
Sky Sports saying that Spurs are bidding £12m for Ings. He's out of contract in 5 weeks time.
http://www1.skysports.com/football/...s-subject-of-16312m-tottenham-bid-sky-sources
Isn't any club free to arrange a pre-contract agreement with Ings at this moment in time?
http://www1.skysports.com/football/...s-subject-of-16312m-tottenham-bid-sky-sources
Isn't any club free to arrange a pre-contract agreement with Ings at this moment in time?
how do you pay 12 million for a player with no contract?
This is probably one of the most bizarre rumours ever. Has any team ever paid a transfer fee for a player who is out of contract in a month? It makes zero sense.
Even if we go with Sky's (incorrect) logic of Spurs getting to speak to him early, why would Ings be in any hurry to sign? It's in his best interest to wait until July and let the offers come in.
Even if we go with Sky's (incorrect) logic of Spurs getting to speak to him early, why would Ings be in any hurry to sign? It's in his best interest to wait until July and let the offers come in.
The offers could have been coming in from Janurary 1st under the bosman rule right? Which makes this rumour even more weird.
Am I one of the few people here who think he's a bit overrated?
Either Tottenham are beyond stupid or I'm not understanding this properly. On a day the FBI have arrested FIFA members I hope it's me that is confused, for football's sake.
This makes no sense, why would it matter to Ings if Burnley get £12 million? If he wants the move he'll end up there anyway.
Maybe Ings has agreed with Burnley to sign a contract so that they get a decent fee? Thats the only thing I can think of.
He's under 24 so there would be a tribunal fee involved.
surely the tribunal fee will not be more than 12 million?
- Status