NM
Full Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2011
- Messages
- 12,489
maybe I'm oldschool. I never refer to it as that. This isn't a university, it's a football club
Random, but are you the same Sadler that used to post on the soccernet comments?
maybe I'm oldschool. I never refer to it as that. This isn't a university, it's a football club
maybe I'm oldschool. I never refer to it as that. This isn't a university, it's a football club
Random, but are you the same Sadler that used to post on the soccernet comments?
I don't use it myself and I also used to consider it sacrilegious until I was given an education on its historical usage by United fans by a supporter who grew up around Duncan Edwards. I had a lengthy chat with him about it once, I learned a lot. You might have heard of him, Tom Clare. He even showed me a pin made by the club with the 'offensive' wording on it, and several matchday programmes. If I find them i'll post them because the original link to it is broken. I might ask him to send them to me.
http://www.theunitedpages.com/the-man-u-myth-by-tom-clare-2/
http://therepublikofmancunia.com/why-saying-man-u-isnt-so-bad/
Reporting got more sloppy and lazy, and the terms “Man yoo” and “Man Utd” started to be heard more and more from these people, and so it was inevitable that opposing team’s fans picked up on this. It was same when the teleprinter became a popular way of showing results on the tv – United’s name would come up and be shown as Man yoo or Man Utd. But these terms never, ever had anything to do with Munich, nor were they meant to be derogatory in any way. Just like the proverbial rolling stone, they have gathered stories as the years have rolled along through people who have put a slant on it to suit their own ends.
In the end, on top of lazy, sloppy journalism, it was just what the football fan saw, read, or heard that brought these terms for Manchester United into more frequent use. It is interesting to note that Big Fat Ron, even when he was managing United, has always referred to the club as “Man yoo.” So the real explanation for both terms is just very plain and simple.
I don't remember my soccernet username anymore, but used to post in the "Fergie accuses Rafa of arrogance and contempt" comments until ESPN ruined it. I remembered you randomly for some reason. Actually remember telling you and others to post on the caf when it went down. I was a lurker then tooI am indeed. Who is this?
Thank you. That's why I love this site. I learn something new every day. It is interesting that we can't type Man and then follow that with a capital U on here. This website edits it to ManUtd. Not that I ever use that term anyways, but I tried to write it in a previous response for what "we aren't allowed to say" and it wouldn't even let me use that term to describe what we can't use...
The fact that we have a poster who is on 59 posts in this thread without ever watching the poor lad says it all.
He's a decent prospect. I don't know if he'll sign or not but I given what we've seen from him thus far he's certainly worth looking at.
He offers something we don't have. He's fast, he's two footed, he's creative, and he has the potential to be top quality.
We simply don't have a player that ticks all those boxes.
I disagree. We have ageing players and a poor defence and DM.I disagree, we have plenty of players that run around a lot and don’t score goals, he’ll fit right in.
I disagree. We have ageing players and a poor defence and DM.
Scoring goals would be quite easily sorted with a decent midfield
From what I've always been told Man Utd is fine, it's "Man Utd" that isn't fine. Even our official website is manutd.com
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-fans-refrain-from-calling-Manchester-United-as-Man Utd
And considering this website won't even let me type the inappropriate way to say our name, I'm going to take that as correct. To give a hint, it has the word "you" but as one letter after "man"
It'll create more chances - of course it would help.A top midfield won’t suddenly turn Rashford into Rudd van Nistelrooy and Lingard will always be shit no matter what you do to the team.
A top midfield won’t suddenly turn Rashford into Rudd van Nistelrooy and Lingard will always be shit no matter what you do to the team.
No, but if miracle transformations is the standard your looking for, life is going to be full of disappointment.
Lingard has ability, he had a good world cup for England. Needs a kick up the arse and a proper consideration about his best position. Longer term I see him as a Number 10 rather than a winger
If this takes a month for Ed to finish, the summer isnt long enough to sign 4 players.Can't we even finalise this transfer !!
It's been going on for about a month now!
Anything above £11m would be a rip off.
All I can say is, I admire your optimism.
Personally think anything above 11.29384837m would be a rip off.
Definately worth following that Reddit ITK guy. He called Kohler right, and a few transfers last season. He also said yesterday that an agreement will be announced with James at around 10pm.
He seems a genuine source of information.
Definately worth following that Reddit ITK guy. He called Kohler right, and a few transfers last season. He also said yesterday that an agreement will be announced with James at around 10pm.
He seems a genuine source of information.
What was his latest news I remember reading Koulibaly.
How do you find him on redditDefinately worth following that Reddit ITK guy. He called Kohler right, and a few transfers last season. He also said yesterday that an agreement will be announced with James at around 10pm.
He seems a genuine source of information.
Definately worth following that Reddit ITK guy. He called Kohler right, and a few transfers last season. He also said yesterday that an agreement will be announced with James at around 10pm.
He seems a genuine source of information.
There's two, im not sure they are the same guy? there's the spoofex guy and that xisimonDefinately worth following that Reddit ITK guy. He called Kohler right, and a few transfers last season. He also said yesterday that an agreement will be announced with James at around 10pm.
He seems a genuine source of information.
They Spoofex guy?
There's two, im not sure they are the same guy? there's the spoofex guy and that xisimon
link?
How do you find him on reddit
Since you two expressed interest - so you do not have to track him down yourself.
There's two, im not sure they are the same guy? there's the spoofex guy and that xisimon
Yeah, will be interesting to see if any of the predictions bear any fruit.Yeah. Xisimon was the one who posted about Kohler deal. Spoofex is posting about transfers now.
Spoofex yes.
So @Kearnkoff69 posted this in the twitter thread yesterday. The reddit guy originally says James being announced with an agreement by 10pm is from a less reliable source. He then put the announcement as part of a bigger update. I asked him if it was backed up by a better source and fortunately he replied saying the better source said James will be done so he put both together and assumed a Lukaku style personal terms agreement would be announced at 10pm.
Given his previous track record and noting that James was announced to the same degree as he expected, a mere 12 hours later, tells me he has valuable information.
Other updates included :
Fletcher not yet announced.
DDG will run down his contract and leave for a free in 2020 unless we get a good fee.
Pogba hasn't answered to a deadline from the club on his commitment but indication is that he stays.
That we are keeping tabs on Griezmann Bale and Pepe. We will only sign one of them. Griezmann is likely using our interest to secure Barcelona anyway.
Sanchez to Inter on loan (we pay 50% of wages) and then he signs permanent the following year.
And the Koulibaly stuff.
I am indeed. Who is this?
Is this confirmation he can do it against Stoke on a rainy and windy Wednesday night?Can’t wait to see Dani Hamez marauding down the wind.
BTW he has also said his source (both) have said James is not meant to be a starting 11 player