rimaldo
All about the essence
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2008
- Messages
- 43,725
- Supports
- arse
If the size medium johnny does not fit, then you must acquit.
the bj simpleton trial will captivate a global audience.
If the size medium johnny does not fit, then you must acquit.
Or we could be amicable about this and swap you Murtough for Ashworth, then we can both crack onEveryone knows he’s leaving, I don’t know anyone who has a justifiable reason to object to his decision. You’re not looking to do a deal, you’re looking to avoid paying the going rate. He’s got 20 months to sit in his garden under the terms of his contract, he’ll get paid his notice period, which will not be anywhere near 20 months. He might get paid for 6 months and then have 14 months before he starts for you.
I don’t personally think that’s good for anyone but, the balls in your court for that one. We’ll have already started the process looking for a replacement and are likely to face a smaller scale situation based on the contract of the candidate we go for.
Real answer is that we just don't know. I'd guess if we paid the £20m he'd start immediately, if we compromised for £10m then he might be in place for next January's window.If we pay them the compensation does he then start with us straight away or will it be in the summer?
How does that work though? Surely no matter the compensation we pay we should get him straight away. What’s the point in them keeping someone that doesn’t want to be there while still having to pay his wages?Real answer is that we just don't know. I'd guess if we paid the £20m he'd start immediately, if we compromised for £10m then he might be in place for next January's window.
Anybody else pick up on the "that's not how UK law works" part of Ratcliffe's interview when it comes to a 20 month period? Sounds like a threat to me.
Hello Berbaclass from the arrogant cnuts forum. He is currently doing an Exile and posting just about every post from here
Froggy, what a gent.Doubt he knows where the M6 is nevermind Manchester.
You're posting on here about Redcafe calling the posters thick as shit and posting links from there. What's the difference?
Berbaclass, you're a good lad. Don't listen to this guy.
That's really funny to be fairThey have turned on me now
Froggy, what a gent.
Everyone knows he’s leaving, I don’t know anyone who has a justifiable reason to object to his decision. You’re not looking to do a deal, you’re looking to avoid paying the going rate. He’s got 20 months to sit in his garden under the terms of his contract, he’ll get paid his notice period, which will not be anywhere near 20 months. He might get paid for 6 months and then have 14 months before he starts for you.
I don’t personally think that’s good for anyone but, the balls in your court for that one. We’ll have already started the process looking for a replacement and are likely to face a smaller scale situation based on the contract of the candidate we go for.
Nah, I can't believe there's a contract that says he can't work for anyone and that he's also not getting paid. Pick one or the other.
Everyone knows he’s leaving, I don’t know anyone who has a justifiable reason to object to his decision. You’re not looking to do a deal, you’re looking to avoid paying the going rate. He’s got 20 months to sit in his garden under the terms of his contract, he’ll get paid his notice period, which will not be anywhere near 20 months. He might get paid for 6 months and then have 14 months before he starts for you.
I don’t personally think that’s good for anyone but, the balls in your court for that one. We’ll have already started the process looking for a replacement and are likely to face a smaller scale situation based on the contract of the candidate we go for.
So… they’re paying him to do nothing basically? Fantastic job that.Yes. Remains employed by NUFC (and will continue receiving salary and accruing benefits) until the period of garden leave ends.
Because sports journalists have to eat and they apparently have nothing better to sensationalise.Why all the hostility over a football administrator of all things, I get if a player leaves etc but a suit it's just weird
They made a big song and dance over nicking him from Brighton when the Saudi's came in and now only a short time after are losing him to a proper club. He was supposed to be a major part of their "master" plan.Why all the hostility over a football administrator of all things, I get if a player leaves etc but a suit it's just weird
We’ll get him either way. Newcastle just need their five minutes of feeling like the big boys.To think this could have all been avoided if you hadn't tried to extort 15m for a lingard loan. #shameful
Same on Twitter… they’re really REALLY bigging up their importance.That Newcastle forum is hilarious. Going on about how rattled we are and how we don’t like them standing up to us.
As if it wasn’t us who fluttered our eyelashes and their marquee hire who immediately dropped his knickers.
I don't blame Newcastle for seeking a decent fee. I have always found it weird you can sign a world class manager for less than a backup fullback
Anybody else pick up on the "that's not how UK law works" part of Ratcliffe's interview when it comes to a 20 month period of gardening leave? Sounds like a threat to me.
If we pay them the compensation does he then start with us straight away or will it be in the summer?
Interesting. Do you work in the legal field by any chance?Garden leave is generally enforceable because the employee continues to be paid by the employer throughout this period. Post-termination restrictions (when the employee has left the business and is no longer being paid or receiving benefits) can be found to be unenforceable if the employer is not careful to ensure that the scope and duration of the restrictive covenants (eg non-compete, non-solicitation, non-poaching restrictions) are only what is reasonably necessary to protect their legitimate business interests. If the covenant period is too long or too broad geographically, then the post termination restrictions are effectively void by being in restraint of trade.
If the reports suggestung that Ashworth cannot join United until January 2026 are accurate, then I would assume that we're not just looking at notice but also some post-termination restrictions on top. Newcastle will probably be able to hold Ashworth to his notice period (which will be served on garden leave), but they might be on shakey ground from an employment law perspective if they have lengthy post-termination restrictions added on (eg a non-compete). In any event, I expect a compromise will be reached as it is in the interests of all parties to do so.
They have turned on me now
Froggy, what a gent.
Interesting. Do you work in the legal field by any chance?
Forum Wars.They have turned on me now
Froggy, what a gent.
Cool. I'm in the middle of a career change to law and start my LLM (SQE1 and SQE2) next month having just done An MA Law (Conversion). I think I'll take the employment law module as it seems to be practically very useful for future work!I do. I have some experience of these matters, but I'm not an employment lawyer (though I am married to one and do also have a number among my colleagues!)
And Luke Edwards is particularly a shit stirrer who has no journalistic integrity and loves to talk shit about Utd.Because sports journalists have to eat and they apparently have nothing better to sensationalise.
Ye that’s what I don’t understand. We’d need him like you said at least a month before the summer window. He’ll have to settle in and pick out targets and players he wants to sell. How come it’s different to when you pay a club compensation for a manager? There aloud to leave straight away and join the new club.We are trying to make a deal mutually acceptable to both parties and so the duration and compensation is what is on the table being negotiated. I would assume the compensation would increase with a shorter duration so finding the tipping point that both are happy with is the key.
I very much doubt Newcastle would agree to any scenario that would allow him to start on Monday, unless there was a separate agreement somehow that guaranteed that United wouldn't approach any named players that are already being lined up by Newcastle.
It would be difficult since I was thinking that three months would be the outcome I would expect, but if you do the maths that it too late really for United.
He needs to be in place I would say at least a month before the end of the season to start changing footballing culture and have a very good idea before the window of which players he wants to sell and a shortlist of player positions to prioritise and an ordered set of targets for each. Ideally as well with some initial contact with the agent even if it's just saying "We'd like to chat in May - let me know if he'd be open to it".
That Newcastle forum is hilarious. Going on about how rattled we are and how we don’t like them standing up to us.
I dont think any Man Utd fan is rattled by them or even really cares that much about them, its the Newcastle fans that are trying to create some fake rivalry between the 2 clubs while most of us just laugh about it.
If we pay them the compensation does he then start with us straight away or will it be in the summer?
I don't think this is actually what he does FYI, he's oversees and builds the departments - I don't know how hands on he is with identifying players. At Brighton that was Paul Winstanely (now at Chelsea) and at Newcastle it's Nickson. It also depends how advanced our data project is given that is where Brighton's strength lay, in Star lizard. Basically, Ashworth isn't coming in and saying x, y and z are our targets for players, he is doing that for staff.Ye that’s what I don’t understand. We’d need him like you said at least a month before the summer window. He’ll have to settle in and pick out targets and players he wants to sell. How come it’s different to when you pay a club compensation for a manager? There aloud to leave straight away and join the new club.