thepolice123
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2008
- Messages
- 12,239
Ronaldo left, Rooney stayed. But Ronaldo has shown more loyalty than Rooney.
Caf logic.
Caf logic.
interview was held in the street, in front of the hospital building ... ambushed there by a RTP crew .. annoyed with questions ...he didn't know what Blatter had exactly said, never listened carefully to the journalist
You lot as so biased towards Ronaldo.
@lonelyred is right though. The bit that Ronaldo appeared to agree to was a remark about: when a player wants to move, the clubs need to sit down and talk. Which was also something Blatter said. However as I've not seen the uncut live interview online since I've no evidence.
Anyone who read the Vidal thread this summer will know how much a soundbite gets recycled, requoted, retranslated and ultimately means very little unless you've got the original footage, a team of translators and too much time on your hands.
In any case, it doesn't matter. He's long gone and his family love Madrid, even if he goes through moods where he doesn't. Something about the cow in the next field always looking greener goes here
He agreed with Blatter's slave comments and uses United to get bigger contracts. Yet folk have a beef with Rooney for his contract shenanigans despite giving us more than a decade.
I don't get anything anymore.
Well, exactly. Long before his eventual departure Ronaldo agitated for a move and got a massive new contract in return (which is exactly what Rooney did that has since earned him so much abuse)
From that point onwards, the main difference is that this new contract wasn't enough for Ronaldo who still forced his way out of United while Rooney looks like finishing his career here.
One of them is a legend who is immnune from criticism. The other a fat useless scouser who fvcked the club over and should still be abused over his contract shenanigans several years later. A fat, useless scouser who might well become Manchester United's highest goalscorer ever.
The difference in the status accorded to these two players by a significant proportion of Manchester United fans is one of the most demented things ever.
Well, exactly. Long before his eventual departure Ronaldo agitated for a move and got a massive new contract in return (which is exactly what Rooney did that has since earned him so much abuse)
From that point onwards, the main difference is that this new contract wasn't enough for Ronaldo who still forced his way out of United while Rooney looks like finishing his career here.
One of them is a legend who is immnune from criticism. The other a fat useless scouser who fvcked the club over and should still be abused over his contract shenanigans several years later. A fat, useless scouser who might well become Manchester United's highest goalscorer ever.
The difference in the status accorded to these two players by a significant proportion of Manchester United fans is one of the most demented things ever.
Yes but Fergie loves Ronaldo and hates Rooney too. It is not as simple as that.
Yes but Fergie loves Ronaldo and hates Rooney too.
Have to admit hypocrisy in the past when it comes to Ronaldo and Rooney. There's little difference between the two except that Ronaldo was good enough to get a big club to bid a world record fee. I can understand fans liking his professionalism more and the fact that he was far superior, but in terms of behvior there's not that much difference as the attitude towards them would suggest.
Have to admit hypocrisy in the past when it comes to Ronaldo and Rooney. There's little difference between the two except that Ronaldo was good enough to get a big club to bid a world record fee. I can understand fans liking his professionalism more and the fact that he was far superior, but in terms of behvior there's not that much difference as the attitude towards them would suggest.
I think people always thought of Ronaldo as a player who would leave. The only question was when, and would we get our money's worth out of him, first as a player and then as a transfer fee. He was the ultimate value for money buy. So, maybe some United fans feel "betrayed" but I really don't, it would have been nice if he'd changed, but actually he just acted how I expected him to.
With Rooney it was different. His whole marketing image (and he has always been heavily marketed) was supposed to be: jumpers for goalposts, plays for the love of it. It was always nonsense of course, he moved for money and glory from "his" club and he'd have done it again if he had to. However I think some people genuinely got duped by the image and felt all the more betrayed when he complained.
Players come and go. Some of them are lucky enough that the club they loved as a kid is located where the want to live, and is also one that will give them money and trophies, but most players aren't. Which is why I don't get too worked up about the loyalty arguments myself.
I think he made United a smaller club in 2008, we win the European cup, and still the worlds best player would rather play somewhere else
You see, I don't buy that for one moment. Players (and managers) come and go. Their contribution varies, but neither their arrival, their departure or their words matter. United was there before them, it will be there after them. It's actually one of the best things about football - it just moves on.
I think people always thought of Ronaldo as a player who would leave. The only question was when, and would we get our money's worth out of him, first as a player and then as a transfer fee. He was the ultimate value for money buy. So, maybe some United fans feel "betrayed" but I really don't, it would have been nice if he'd changed, but actually he just acted how I expected him to.
Keane recalls a conversation with Ronaldo and Silvestre: "I'd go, 'Lads, when you signed, you must've known it f---in' rains a lot in Manchester.' They'd go, 'We knew, but we didn't know it would be this bad.'
"If they're used to going for a cappuccino at half-ten at night, sitting on a balcony somewhere, and all of a sudden it's dark at half-four and it's f---in' freezing, that is going to change them. I know this, because they told me."
With Rooney it was different. His whole marketing image (and he has always been heavily marketed) was supposed to be: jumpers for goalposts, plays for the love of it. It was always nonsense of course, he moved for money and glory from "his" club and he'd have done it again if he had to. However I think some people genuinely got duped by the image and felt all the more betrayed when he complained.
Players come and go. Some of them are lucky enough that the club they loved as a kid is located where the want to live, and is also one that will give them money and trophies, but most players aren't. Which is why I don't get too worked up about the loyalty arguments myself.
In my opinion, Ronaldo was desperate to be seen as better than Messi, and didn't think he could achieve that at United.
He had more than enough time to give more years to United, and join Madrid later, if it was all for personal reasons.
But for me, it was as much about trying to elevate himself on a bigger platform as it was about it being his boyhood club or anything else.
You see, I don't buy that for one moment. Players (and managers) come and go. Their contribution varies, but neither their arrival, their departure or their words matter. United was there before them, it will be there after them. It's actually one of the best things about football - it just moves on.
In my opinion, Ronaldo was desperate to be seen as better than Messi, and didn't think he could achieve that at United.
He had more than enough time to give more years to United, and join Madrid later.
But for me, it was as much about trying to elevate himself on a bigger platform as it was about it being his boyhood club or anything else.
The thing is, that theory was proved wrong as he became the worlds best player playing in England, so he already proved he was a better player. He just wanted to move to Spain
Not to mention that, even without him in our squad, United's record domestically and in the CL was better than Madrid's for the majority of his career in Spain to date.
If he really did leave to "elevate himself to a bigger platform", hindsight has proven that to be a bad decision. I don't think he did. He left for a massive pay-check and better weather. Which is fair enough but let's not dress his motivations up into something they weren't.
Rooney meanwhile went about denouncing United's ambitions and implicitly implying that the team wasn't good enough (or was perceived in that manner) which was rather destabilizing to the team.
I don't think he had, but fair enough.The thing is, that theory was proved wrong as he became the worlds best player playing in England, so he already proved he was a better player. He just wanted to move to Spain
Madrid were/are still a more glamorous club than us, despite not winning as much in recent times.
It's not been a bad decision at all, either. His brand and standing has indeed increased.
Messi's just been that much better.
Not to mention that, even without him in our squad, United's record domestically and in the CL was better than Madrid's for the majority of his career in Spain to date.
If he really did leave to "elevate himself to a bigger platform", hindsight has proven that to be a bad decision. I don't think he did. He left for a massive pay-cheque and better weather. Which is fair enough but let's not dress his motivations up into something they weren't.
Obviously I can't prove it, but I think it would have been different here. Like I said, Madrid are seen as more glamorous.It's increased in line with his own performances. Would have been no different if he'd stayed put.
Madrid were/are still a more glamorous club than us, despite not winning as much in recent times.
It's not been a bad decision at all, either. His brand and standing has indeed increased.
Messi's just been that much better.
Messi had surpassed him by the time he left England.The thing is, that theory was proved wrong as he became the worlds best player playing in England, so he already proved he was a better player. He just wanted to move to Spain
Messi had surpassed him by the time he left England.
Madrid were a step up for Ronaldo. That's why he left.
Yeah, my timing might be off.Messi before guadiola took over, would show flashes of brilliance but was always on the sidelines, so Ronaldo's motives were not about matching messi. He already surpassed messi, he just wanted a change, I think the timing was off to be honest, but oh well
Ronaldo fulfilled his promise and then some more at United winning plenty of trophies and individual accolades whilst leaving us with a cool 80 mil. Rooney on the other hand didn't reach the lofty heights that many thought he would. This is no slight on Rooney but he was one of the best teenagers to grace the modern game and he seemed to have more potential than Ronaldo when they started at United.
I agree with both points and I've mentioned them before as well. So I do agree with you and @jojojo on that. I personally never held a grudge against Ronaldo for leaving.The excuse by some United fans a few things
1 He was honest about, as he never wanted to stay here long term, rooney did And he went back on his word
2 Ronaldo never wanted to join Man city and Chelsea, Rooney did. But only Madrid, which makes him lesser of the 2 evils
Agree with the first bit.Not has a team, he did not leave United for a better team, he left for a warmer climate and more money, that is it. Didn't you see madrid in the 2008/09 season?
Ronaldo when he left England was still the worlds best player, messi was just in a better team
Yeah, my timing might be off.
But I think Messi was considered at least as good as Ronaldo (and the better talent) when he left for Madrid, even though Ronaldo had had the better year.
It wasn't just more money or a warmer climate, in my opinion. It was the glamour that comes with playing for Madrid.
Madrid might not have been the better team, but they were the better club in Ronaldo's eyes - at least the better club for him to become the even bigger star he wanted to be.
Obviously I can't prove it, but I think it would have been different here. Like I said, Madrid are seen as more glamorous.
40 goals for Madrid does more for a player than 40 goals for United, in my opinion. Especially when they're in 'competition' with a player considered potentially the best of all time, who plays in Spain.
Not to mention the whole Messi - Ronaldo thing could really take off. El Classicos, scoring records etc..
Ronaldo versus Messi was already a big deal back then.
Your timing was fine the first time, Messi had a much better year before Cristiano left for Spain, that was the year Guardiola took over and when Messi properly came to life (helped by a lack of injuries too).
Cristiano Ronaldo still played well that season but he was not as good (and sulked a lot more) as the previous season.