Raul Madrid
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2014
- Messages
- 3,457
I never said that silva is better than iniesta. I said that if hypothetically silva was in place of iniesta that barca and spain would have similar success. I don't think you should make such a big judgement over one or two matches. Over a whole season for barca and if silva was the main player always for spain I think both teams would be of a similar level but not as good. Xavi is on the decline now too so of course he will get more votes. The results of these polls would change from week to wek also.Funny you say this. Both Iniesta and Silva started in Spain's defeat against Switzerland in 2010. Del Bosque knew it wasn't working and he had to change things immediately. He decided that playing with both Silva and Iniesta was not working and was also too narrow, so instead of sacrificing an unfit and injured Iniesta who had missed a month of the season end due to injury, he actually sacrificed Silva. Silva didn't play again at all in that tournament apart from last 5 minutes against Germany in the semis. So as good as Silva is, Del Bosque didn't even replace an injured Iniesta by him, let alone an Iniesta in top form. You are criminally underrating Iniesta. There was a poll on Marca (yes Marca, a Madrid based paper) some weeks ago where they could choose their world cup squad and Iniesta got most of the votes despite having an average season for his standard.