tenpoless
No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Still no tweet from Ronaldo. Sack him.
Apart from the lucky 75,000 who have tickets to the game, it is going to be so annoying not having this on Sky, BT, Amazon or anything else live in the UK.
I will have to search for a river…
Exactly. And feck knows what instalments we are paying from previous deals during this window.Do we not think Leeds will be paying the James fee over instalments. Bit of a silly piece of logic
Ronaldo will bring in far more money to the club than his wages going out, so you can't say the money would have been better spent elsewhere. We'll be up financially thanks to the Ronaldo signing.I'm not gonna win this 1 so i'm not gonna bother arguing, but this is a terrible idea based on nostalgia and name value. Committing to making a 36-year-old our highest-earning player and paying him that wage past his 38th birthday is never going to end well. That money could have been spending so much better in other areas of the team instead of in a position we were pretty well set this season. It was also likely to impact Greenwoods development as a striker as he basically won't get any time in the position now with Ronaldo and Cavani. Plus this is not the Ronaldo of yesteryear, yes he will still score, but his game when a team is out of possession is basically none exsistent and the other 10 players are going to have to compensate which is going to cause problems through the team.
Of course I will get shouted down and told to shut up as fans only care about the big shinney name, but this is an awful signing.
Nice.
I'm not gonna win this 1 so i'm not gonna bother arguing, but this is a terrible idea based on nostalgia and name value. Committing to making a 36-year-old our highest-earning player and paying him that wage past his 38th birthday is never going to end well. That money could have been spending so much better in other areas of the team instead of in a position we were pretty well set this season. It was also likely to impact Greenwoods development as a striker as he basically won't get any time in the position now with Ronaldo and Cavani. Plus this is not the Ronaldo of yesteryear, yes he will still score, but his game when a team is out of possession is basically none exsistent and the other 10 players are going to have to compensate which is going to cause problems through the team.
Of course I will get shouted down and told to shut up as fans only care about the big shinney name, but this is an awful signing.
Probably won't be. Most transfers aren't anyway, just never been reported as such in years gone by.Sale of Dan James is paid in full?
It's Ronaldo. Enjoy.I'm not gonna win this 1 so i'm not gonna bother arguing, but this is a terrible idea based on nostalgia and name value. Committing to making a 36-year-old our highest-earning player and paying him that wage past his 38th birthday is never going to end well. That money could have been spending so much better in other areas of the team instead of in a position we were pretty well set this season. It was also likely to impact Greenwoods development as a striker as he basically won't get any time in the position now with Ronaldo and Cavani. Plus this is not the Ronaldo of yesteryear, yes he will still score, but his game when a team is out of possession is basically none exsistent and the other 10 players are going to have to compensate which is going to cause problems through the team.
Of course I will get shouted down and told to shut up as fans only care about the big shinney name, but this is an awful signing.
So the tweet is a bit of a false comparison.Probably won't be. Most transfers aren't anyway, just never been reported as such in years gone by.
I have a sneaky suspicion that he’ll get the number 7 shirt as we have mutually agreed with Cavani that he can leave
Me too, feck it I’m getting an «authentic»
I have a sneaky suspicion that he’ll get the number 7 shirt as we have mutually agreed with Cavani that he can leave
No doubt, Ronnie is still getting the 7.Nah Cavani is staying
Watch the game, leave at 5 and get to your Gig for about 8 or 9pm. For a laugh and if you feel brave travel with the Geordies back up to NewcastleI have an offer for a ticket but I also have a gig I have tickets for up in Newcastle at 7pm that I've been waiting 2yrs for - I'm so very very conflicted right now!
Posted this on page 3.. got buried in the early storm of comments..All 3 zipped - https://we.tl/t-oR2CFwszU4
F.E.A.R - https://we.tl/t-rCA6y7tztI
Proof - Insane https://we.tl/t-MhSA7RTimf
Proof - Slam - A la menthe - https://we.tl/t-YvCUWsgtg6
The resolution really hasnt aged well over 13 years... but absolutely fantastic compilations..
This needs to be mandatory viewing for anyone who is new..
I'm not gonna win this 1 so i'm not gonna bother arguing, but this is a terrible idea based on nostalgia and name value. Committing to making a 36-year-old our highest-earning player and paying him that wage past his 38th birthday is never going to end well. That money could have been spending so much better in other areas of the team instead of in a position we were pretty well set this season. It was also likely to impact Greenwoods development as a striker as he basically won't get any time in the position now with Ronaldo and Cavani. Plus this is not the Ronaldo of yesteryear, yes he will still score, but his game when a team is out of possession is basically none exsistent and the other 10 players are going to have to compensate which is going to cause problems through the team.
Of course I will get shouted down and told to shut up as fans only care about the big shinney name, but this is an awful signing.
Watch the game, leave at 5 and get to your Gig for about 8 or 9pm. For a laugh and if you feel brave travel with the Geordies back up to Newcastle
Failing all that, you can offer OT ticket to me
Nice.
Still no tweet from Ronaldo. Sack him.
That yet to be proved, lots of clubs have tried it and struggled, Juve being 1 of them which is why they are so happy to get him off the wage bill, everyone always things like shirt sales, which the club only get a tiny percentage off, Ronaldo also gets most of his own sponsorships. Is Ronaldo going to bring in a minimum extra £375,000 (which is the minimum amount I've seen his wages quoted at) into the club, we will have to see. Not to mention every time you increase your top earner it increases every other player you negotiate with wage demand. Plus you think sponsors are going to still be flocking to him as much at 37? at 38? probably to some level but nothing compared to when he was in his prime.Ronaldo will bring in far more money to the club than his wages going out, so you can't say the money would have been better spent elsewhere. We'll be up financially thanks to the Ronaldo signing.