What a finish. If someone like Kumar had any brains we would have won this
To be fair that six by Jadeja over midwicket was outstanding. Was not even over pitched.Crap last over from Anderson. Good stuff from Jadeja.
Yea. Great shot.To be fair that six by Jadeja over midwicket was outstanding. Was not even over pitched.
India have been a bit unlucky this series. Thought form of Dhawan and Sharma has been a major handicap. Dhoni needs to come at 5 as well.
The main issue I've with Rohit and Dhawan is they seemingly can't rotate the strike in the first ten overs. Raina is on his last chance really.
Also agreed with Crappy, really disappointed with Kumar's shot, should've stayed till the end and we would've won the match.
Am I the only one who doesn't really see an issue in BCCI asking for a bigger share in profit when they're generating most of the money anyway?
I think there's a distinction that needs to be made here. The BCCI doesn't generate any money for ICC. ICC's revenue is the money they make from hosting world cups and the BCCI is claiming a large share of it as theirs because it's from the country they're in.
If the BCCI actually did something to generate this revenue, then I think they have a point. Right now, they don't. No one's taking away the BCCI's own revenue they generate from bilateral tours, that goes straight to their coffers.
I think all sports bodies should distribute revenues with neutral factors weighed in. The premier league does that and it is why it is such a good league.
And the fact that the BCCI claim that it generates 80% of the revenue is bs.
Are you disputing that India generate 80% of the revenue?
If yes, what is your source? Everywhere I've read this reported as fact.
I asked him if he could provide a figure for what an ICC World Cup, minus a sulking BCCI, would financially look like.
His answer: half of ICC profits would be affected and turn into a 15% to 20% hit on the other seven Full Member nations. His calculations were simple. Bilateral matches involving India normally earn the rights holder "between US$5 million and $10 million per match." It is what ICC World Cup matches earn, he says, on average even though most matches don't involve India. "The crux of the question is whether the Indian public still has an appetite for a World Cup without India. ICC profits could probably be expected to halve, which would shave 15% to 20% off the budgets of the Small Seven."
The numbers and the calculations can be argued over, but they were worked out by a cricket fan in a quick turnaround email. Just like that. Former ICC president Ehsan Mani, and head of its finance and marketing for six years offers a different calculation in his ten-page note on the position paper. If India did not participate in an ICC event, while there would be a "significant reduction in the value of ICC's commercial rights" but "not a reduction of 80% of ICC revenues." He states that, "From discussions with the broadcaster," the estimate for a World Cup without Pakistan, South Africa and the West Indies has in fact, pegged the reduction in ICC revenues to somewhere between,"30% to 40%." Well, knock me dead.
Yes. You want to go down the premier league way rather than the la liga way. Typical bcci behaviour in being completely obsessed with money and power. It's pathetic how the government doesn't open them right up in terms of transparency.I think there's a distinction that needs to be made here. The BCCI doesn't generate any money for ICC. ICC's revenue is the money they make from hosting world cups and the BCCI is claiming a large share of it as theirs because it's from the country they're in.
If the BCCI actually did something to generate this revenue, then I think they have a point. Right now, they don't. No one's taking away the BCCI's own revenue they generate from bilateral tours, that goes straight to their coffers.
I think all sports bodies should distribute revenues with neutral factors weighed in. The premier league does that and it is why it is such a good league.
Because it is a cash cow with politicians from all major parties involved in administrationYes. You want to go down the premier league way rather than the la liga way. Typical bcci behaviour in being completely obsessed with money and power. It's pathetic how the government doesn't open them right up in terms of transparency.
KP dropped for the T20 WC. Big call, I wonder if this is the end for him or if they'll keep him for the Test matches?
Great player, a joy to watch when in-form. Seemed he didn't get along with his teammates, and some of his actions raised eyebrows. But you can't deny he's been one of the best batsman England have had it will be a loss should this be the end.
KP dropped for the T20 WC. Big call, I wonder if this is the end for him or if they'll keep him for the Test matches?
Great player, a joy to watch when in-form. Seemed he didn't get along with his teammates, and some of his actions raised eyebrows. But you can't deny he's been one of the best batsman England have had it will be a loss should this be the end.
Gone from all forms by the looks of it.
Big call by the ECB. What a joy he was to watch when on song. Has to be his effect on the dressing room, always rumors about him not getting along with the rest.
To be fair, if you aren't English, the people in England turn on you quickly. See Andy "Scottish if he loses" Murray.
Mind you, texting the opposition insulting your captain will alienate teammates quickly.
Thats not strictly true, and the comparison with. Murray. KP hasn't helped himself, but I don't agree with this decision and I'm worried for the future of the team. The fans deserve to know what actually happened and I hope that is revealed because there is more to this then meets the eye.
I think I might be done with English cricket.
A team of boring, attritional cricketers managed by a dour, attritional, boring coach who also was never actually a good cricketer.
Thank you KP, one of the best we've ever had. The Oval, Headingly and Mumbai are some of the greatest knocks I've ever seen.
I'm so angry right now it's unhealthy.
The comparism is of them being Scottish/ South African whenever they don't perform. I think that's fair.
It is a terrible decision though.
Flower was a great cricketer. Other than that, agree.
The comparism is of them being Scottish/ South African whenever they don't perform. I think that's fair.
.
To be fair, if you aren't English, the people in England turn on you quickly. See Andy "Scottish if he loses" Murray.
Mind you, texting the opposition insulting your captain will alienate teammates quickly.
Feel a bit gutted even though I've heavily criticised KP in the past. He's great to watch when on form. But there has to be some looking at the future after that ashes tour.
Feel a bit gutted even though I've heavily criticised KP in the past. He's great to watch when on form. But there has to be some looking at the future after that ashes tour.
The guy is only 33, if they are looking to future drop everyone else as well then Bell, Anderson, Prior etc. This is not about the future, this is something else. Giles was one of the people at the meeting now watch him take charge and take England back to the dark days.
TheGame, I thought you were an Indian expat in the US for some reason. It's not as if you can't support England of course, but you didn't seem the British type.