TheGame
Full Member
This is shambolic behaviour, get's away easy if its just a 2 match ban.
Concussion substitute has been used for the first time in Test cricket history as Sarfraz Ahmed was hit on the helmet vs Sri Lanka. Mo Rizwan has taken his place.
Not in test cricket.? It's been used loads of times
Not in test cricket.
Why is salt not in the WC squad? Everytime I see him he's so destructive
Must have been some tough decisions. I think buttler is my favourite ever player. This is some hittingBecause we are absolutely stacked, there's no Brook either!
He’s not been in great form up until the last couple of games I think. This has been an incredible innings from all three of them so far.Why is salt not in the WC squad? Everytime I see him he's so destructive
It must have been the last few games I've seen then.He’s not been in great form up until the last couple of games I think. This has been an incredible innings from all three of them so far.
The score is looking much better than it was 45 minutes ago. At least we’ve got a game.Would have loved Manchester to be setting a score
It's acty the first year I've got into it. It's quite fun. Some unbelievable hitting.Hundred - a disgrace
Sorry all, will now leave you to it.
You sound like my grandad when I used to talk about ODI’s to him.Hundred - a disgrace
Sorry all, will now leave you to it.
I'm fully for modernizing and innovation in cricket. This is not it. At risk of doing the complete opposite.You sound like my grandad when I used to talk about ODI’s to him.
There’s definitely things that I feel are a bit unnecessary, and I’ll only watch the Sky commentary because BBC is almost unwatchable for me, but I also think it’s popular to shit on it for reasons that aren’t really relevant.I'm fully for modernizing and innovation in cricket. This is not it. At risk of doing the complete opposite.
There’s definitely things that I feel are a bit unnecessary, and I’ll only watch the Sky commentary because BBC is almost unwatchable for me, but I also think it’s popular to shit on it for reasons that aren’t really relevant.
I keep reading people talking about how it forced the Ashes to be crammed into a smaller period of time, and similar things that just don’t really stand up.
There is of course very relevant discussions to be had around the county game etc.
There’s been huge positives but it’s impossible for me to quantify how it would compare to a T20 tournament. I’m not even bothered about trying to defend it vs traditional cricket because I’d rather be watching a T20 without the gimmicks. However I’m not snobby about it, people who haven’t watched it out of principle have missed some incredible cricket.Can you name me a positive of it that if the T20 had the same backing it also could not have achieved?
The Hundred wont be here in 3 years. No other country will ever play it.
There’s been huge positives but it’s impossible for me to quantify how it would compare to a T20 tournament. I’m not even bothered about trying to defend it vs traditional cricket because I’d rather be watching a T20 without the gimmicks. However I’m not snobby about it, people who haven’t watched it out of principle have missed some incredible cricket.
Hundred - a disgrace
Sorry all, will now leave you to it.
T20 is a terrific format, England is one of the few places with great cricket following, and I don't understand why ECB doesn't create a T20 league in the IPL mould..
I haven’t been watching it but I’ve been following the scores.Is anyone watching the CPL T20?
Well that’s what the Hundred effectively is. Reality there’s not much difference minus 20 balls. The ECB is trying to go out on its own but long term I think outside finance will have to be a factor a bit like the SA20.
It's not - it's T20(which has lots of bells and whistles) with even more bells and whistles.
None of my friends in India watch the Hundred. It's on TV.
I'd tune in if it was T20. Maybe there's actually nothing incremental to know or very little, but it's marketed in a way that makes me think it's something else.