Cricket

They've broken him. Shunting him all over the order plus his propensity to have brain explosions equals one seriously muddled mind. I still think he's England's best spinner but I think Leach suits Root's captaincy more (i.e. a spinner to hold an end).

For the next test I'd go Rashid, Ali, *Curran* and Jennings out. Broad, Leach, *Woakes* and Denly in.

Burns
Denly
Bairstow
Root
Stokes
Buttler
Foakes
Woakes
Broad
Leach
Anderson
That is what I would do but expect Ali to start over Lynch
 
They've broken him. Shunting him all over the order plus his propensity to have brain explosions equals one seriously muddled mind. I still think he's England's best spinner but I think Leach suits Root's captaincy more (i.e. a spinner to hold an end).

For the next test I'd go Rashid, Ali and Jennings out. Broad, Leach and Denly in.

Burns
Denly
Bairstow
Root
Stokes
Buttler
Foakes
Woakes
Broad
Leach
Anderson

Problem is the one Nasser (I think) just alluded to on comms. The next pitch is supposed to be slow and low, and two spinners will probably have to play. We could end up in a situation where we pick that side (which we should have played this test) and feck up the selection again.

I'd also rejig the batting line up again. It's not working. Bairstow at three is fair enough, but Stokes is in no nick and Buttler still feels like a luxury at 6. Move Buttler to 5 have Stokes at 6 (although there's an argument that Foakes should be at 6 and Stokes at 7). If Buttler isn't good enough to bat at 5, he's not good enough to play as a specialist bat.
 
Someone remind me of the laws here, I thought I remembered seeing that the boundary is where the rope is supposed to be, not where it is moved to?

In which case that should have been a six?
 
Moeen Ali having his roots in Pakistan is cut from the same cloth much like the Pakistan Cricket players. Very talented and an exciting player but highly inconsistent. I've not seen many Cricketers having lost their wicket so cheaply on a consistent basis. He's either amazing or infuriating when batting.
 
Last edited:
Someone remind me of the laws here, I thought I remembered seeing that the boundary is where the rope is supposed to be, not where it is moved to?

In which case that should have been a six?
My first thoughts. Oh, well. Hardly matters.
 
That was satisfying. Happiest this team has made me in quite some time :D
 
Problem is the one Nasser (I think) just alluded to on comms. The next pitch is supposed to be slow and low, and two spinners will probably have to play. We could end up in a situation where we pick that side (which we should have played this test) and feck up the selection again.

I'd also rejig the batting line up again. It's not working. Bairstow at three is fair enough, but Stokes is in no nick and Buttler still feels like a luxury at 6. Move Buttler to 5 have Stokes at 6 (although there's an argument that Foakes should be at 6 and Stokes at 7). If Buttler isn't good enough to bat at 5, he's not good enough to play as a specialist bat.

Yeah they should look at the pitch of course and then make a selection. If it's conducive to spin I'd put Ali in for Woakes. With the turn being slow and low England really need Leach to control things, Ali usually flourishes when there's bounce on offer. I'd be reluctant to change the order too much, batsmen can be a bit sensitive over such things.

Interestingly I think Buttler out of everyone would be the most likely to succeed as an emergency top order batsman, he's the one who seemingly learns the conditions and adapts the quickest. Stokes, Bairstow and Ali are all really experienced players and I fear if they haven't figured out their game's by now, they never will.
 
What kind of shot was that from Moeen :lol:
Too often now when the end is nigh they don’t give a toss

Lose in 4 days and have an extra rest day rather than come back and do it all again on day 5 and probably lose anyway
 
Too often now when the end is nigh they don’t give a toss

Lose in 4 days and have an extra rest day rather than come back and do it all again on day 5 and probably lose anyway

I agree with your point in general, but Ali in particular does demonstrate quite poor shot selection at times. This isn’t the first time I’ve watched him and thought “what a brainless shot.” Thing is IMO he’s a very talented batsman, so why he self inflicts these fates on himself I do not know.
 
Yeah they should look at the pitch of course and then make a selection. If it's conducive to spin I'd put Ali in for Woakes. With the turn being slow and low England really need Leach to control things, Ali usually flourishes when there's bounce on offer. I'd be reluctant to change the order too much, batsmen can be a bit sensitive over such things.

Interestingly I think Buttler out of everyone would be the most likely to succeed as an emergency top order batsman, he's the one who seemingly learns the conditions and adapts the quickest. Stokes, Bairstow and Ali are all really experienced players and I fear if they haven't figured out their game's by now, they never will.

I think the problem is though that we've tried the softly softly pandering approach and players have made the same mistakes for the entire time Bayliss has been here. Even Root has gone to shit over the past few years.

I think for too long mediocre returns have been tolerated on the basis of talent and there has to be a greater emphasis placed on not throwing your wicket away. There's too many good players with far too mediocre records.
 
I think the problem is though that we've tried the softly softly pandering approach and players have made the same mistakes for the entire time Bayliss has been here. Even Root has gone to shit over the past few years.

I think for too long mediocre returns have been tolerated on the basis of talent and there has to be a greater emphasis placed on not throwing your wicket away. There's too many good players with far too mediocre records.

From director through to coach and finally captain I have little faith that any of them will play a firm hand. The opportunity to change will come after the World Cup when Bayliss goes.
 
For the first time since the 2011 World Cup, India will not meet Pakistan in the group stage of an ICC event. The two teams have faced each other in five ICC tournaments since 2011 - and will meet again in the 2019 World Cup in England and Wales - but cricket's traditional rivalry will not be on show in the group stages of 2020 T20 World Cup in Australia.

This is a result of the present T20I rankings, where Pakistan and India occupy the No. 1 and No. 2 spots respectively, necessitating the two teams to be placed in different groups for the tournament.

The Groups
Group A: Pakistan, Australia, West Indies, New Zealand, Qualifier 1, Qualifier 2

Group B: India, England, South Africa, Afghanistan, Qualifier 3, Qualifier 4

Sad day for ICC missing out on their glorified blockbuster match up.
 
India pak final would be good.

The defeat that follows will be less so tbf.

"Who won the World Twenty20 in 2020?" It will be a popular quiz question for centuries to come.

Its really not that bad. We barely play Pakistan as it is. The WC games are quite the spectacle.

It's just that the ICC have previously admitted that Ind-Pak is too big to not have at ICC events. I get the viewpoint but rigging draws is not the way to go. They would have been 'drawn' together if they weren't the top two ranked teams.
 
Curran or Leach, Denly is replacing Jennings, and assume Broad for the departed Rashid

Burns
Denly
Bairstow
Root
Stokes
Buttler
Ali
Foakes
Curran/ Leach
Broad
Anderson
 
I mean England aren't great but he's been waiting to write this piece for ages. India would pick Moeen would they, they didn't even pick Jadeja at Southampton when Ashwin wasn't fully fit.
Agree, it feels like the piece has been shoehorned out a bit. Agree with most of his comments though.

It's harsh but I'd drop Foakes, move Stokes and Buttler down one and move Bairstow down to five. Butter to be main keeper but Bairstow can deputise when needed.

We'd need to go and find a new no.3 but hopefully there's someone out there.
 
Curran or Leach, Denly is replacing Jennings, and assume Broad for the departed Rashid

Burns
Denly
Bairstow
Root
Stokes
Buttler
Ali
Foakes
Curran/ Leach
Broad
Anderson
Curran still shouldn't be in as a bowler, be it third or fourth seamer.
 
Our batting without Kohli holding it together, is utter shambles. Not sure what utter mediocrity like Rayudu is doing in the team while the likes of Rahane sit out.
 
Glad to see this happening. Our middle order is full of mediocrity. This will raise some eyes.
 
Curran still shouldn't be in as a bowler, be it third or fourth seamer.

He's good enough as a fourth seamer but I would have preferred to have seen Woakes over him. Jimmy and Stokes will be still be knackered after the last test.
 
England lost the toss, and bat first. Curran keeps his place. As expected Denly and Broad replace Jennings and Rashid