jamesjimmybyrondean
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2019
- Messages
- 7,489
What about Sancho?He plays anywhere across the front and we currently have Rashy, Tony, Antony & Bruno.
It’s really not enough. Never mind just a striker.
What about Sancho?He plays anywhere across the front and we currently have Rashy, Tony, Antony & Bruno.
It’s really not enough. Never mind just a striker.
Hoi Cody!
I hope we don't get him. We have a young attacking group.
A key thing to be a truly top team, is you need an elite level attacker. The experienced 4 we have are all good, with very good potential, but none of them are truly elite attackers, none have that potential. We don't have a superstar in attack now or potentially. We need someone who has an elite ceiling IMO to truly bring us up a level in attack, especially due to everyone's ages here.
- Rashford - 25
- Martial - 27
- Antony - 22
- Sancho - 22
- Garnacho - 18
Gakpo IMO doesn't even have the potential that our 5 attackers have... He's a good player, but he lacks a lot to his game. He plays in a position where we really don't need reinforcements, unless we get someone in who can be an actual elite player.
I'll be honest, this one doesn't excite me at all. But again Ten Hag has been so far spot on with his signings and we're not exactly in a position to lure the Mbappes of the world.
Apparently the board is ready to back ETH in the market this winter
Apparently the board is ready to back ETH in the market this winter
I will believe it when I see it.
That being said:
GET IN!
I'm not saying don't sign anyone, I'm saying Gakpo isn't the guy we should be going for. Gakpo will be a 50m squad player who fails to outperform other starters which isn't what we want. We need depth, 100%. Get someone to be depth. I'm very much OK with getting Memphis in January for cheap, having him rotate with Martial and have Rashford, Antony, Garnacho and Sancho be the wing options. That will be good enough to see us through to the summer or the following summer, where we have the budget to actually spend big on a player that suits us more.On paper Great. But your sounding like the worst DoF right about now.
We have 3 positions for our attack and you want us to compete for top 4 until the end of the season with:
- A terrible number 9 in Rashford
- An injury prone main striker in Martial
- An 18 year old who is just breaking through and is in no way Lionel Messi at 18 or even Michael Owen.
- Then there is Sancho… where’s Wolly!
It’s noway as solid as you are making it out to be to not add additional quality for the ‘attacking 3’.
I'm not saying don't sign anyone, I'm saying Gakpo isn't the guy we should be going for. Gakpo will be a 50m squad player who fails to outperform other starters which isn't what we want. We need depth, 100%. Get someone to be depth. I'm very much OK with getting Memphis in January for cheap, having him rotate with Martial and have Rashford, Antony, Garnacho and Sancho be the wing options. That will be good enough to see us through to the summer or the following summer, where we have the budget to actually spend big on a player that suits us more.
Gakpo is just going after a shiny toy who scored a few goals in the first half of the season in the dutch league and a few goals against mediocre opposition in the world cup, and COMPLETELY ignoring what players we have, what sort of player Gakpo is, what our team needs actually are, and his adaptability to the Prem. He's prime potential flop material and generally just doesn't have the potential level that would be required to succeed here.
Do you not worry about the lack of a quality number 9 though
fecking hell, celebrating like leedsI will believe it when I see it.
That being said:
GET IN!
Not really. I don't think we necessarily need an absolute pure 9. My impression of Gakpo is that he has a lot more to his game than people give him credit for. He could be a very good versatile 9, I think. I'm very excited to see what Ten Hag would do with him and also to see a frontline of Garnacho/Rashford - Gakpo - Antony, with Bruno just behind. A good combination of creativity, energy, and speed in that.
fecking hell, celebrating like leeds
I'm not saying don't sign anyone, I'm saying Gakpo isn't the guy we should be going for. Gakpo will be a 50m squad player who fails to outperform other starters which isn't what we want. We need depth, 100%. Get someone to be depth. I'm very much OK with getting Memphis in January for cheap, having him rotate with Martial and have Rashford, Antony, Garnacho and Sancho be the wing options. That will be good enough to see us through to the summer or the following summer, where we have the budget to actually spend big on a player that suits us more.
Gakpo is just going after a shiny toy who scored a few goals in the first half of the season in the dutch league and a few goals against mediocre opposition in the world cup, and COMPLETELY ignoring what players we have, what sort of player Gakpo is, what our team needs actually are, and his adaptability to the Prem. He's prime potential flop material and generally just doesn't have the potential level that would be required to succeed here.
If Gakpo signs for United, what would be their 1st choice and 2nd choice front 3?
For me the wide areas seemed packed and the middle non-existent
If he was free, sure. But hes clearly going to take a big chunk out of our already depleted budget, so hard to get excited about that, instead worrying if hes the right one..Sorry for being excited about a played who I like, who actually wants to come here, and who we can realistically get.
City also won without a pure 9 after Aguero until they signed Haaland and AlvarezI agree. I actually think we maybe need to get away from this fascination with an pure 9 role. Liverpool have showed for a few years that you dont necessarily need that kind of role if the goals are coming from all across that front line. I think that out and out CF is in need of a regen nowadays - managers are seemingly starting more to fancy having a versatile and adapatable front line to keep opponents guessing.
If he was free, sure. But hes clearly going to take a big chunk out of our already depleted budget, so hard to get excited about that, instead worrying if hes the right one..
I know you can't have a fixed front 3, but what I mean is.. Look at the 6 names you've given.. I'd argue that 4 out of 6 of them are best on the LW. Martial and Antony being the odd two, but even they've played there.I think we have so many games and the notion of a fixed front 3 is pointless due to injuries/ form/ amount of games, if we do sign him I think it will be
Martial - Main striker, don't see him getting minutes in another position
Garnacho - Clearly rotational, predominantly left wing but will get time on the right in certain games
Rashford - Typically LW but will get time as a striker
Sancho - Should be between RW and LW
Antony - Should be nailed on for RW if he can step up
Gakpo - Spread between LW and Striker.
6 players for 3 positions and we loan Elanga out like we should have done.
Depleted now perhaps. However, come the summer...If he was free, sure. But hes clearly going to take a big chunk out of our already depleted budget, so hard to get excited about that, instead worrying if hes the right one..
Correct. All this ‘investment’ in playing squad is solely aimed at maximising profitability of a sale next year. There’s every chance ETH gets his wish list and we have a stellar January window. Wouldn’t hurt the Glazers to go out in style either would it?I get that, but I believe that if we are going shopping this winter at all it's done under the assumption the club will be sold before long. In that case the budget doesn't matter, particularly if it's an oil state.
Eh I don't think we have a lack of depth outside of #9. We have 4 players between 2 positions for the wings, which is perfect. Sancho is going through some shit right now but we don't just eliminate him from squad numbers on the back of that. Garnacho is a high potential 18 year old (IMO has a higher potential than Gakpo due to his pace and dribbling which Gakpo doesn't have). Gakpo hasn't really ever shown he can actually play as a #9. He's done OK on the right. Best on the left. For Netherlands he played in a free role and didn't do that great, but scored some nice goals. If we buy him and he's not meant as a striker, then we'll end up needing to sell one of the others as you can't keep 5 players happy between 2 positions, unless Rashford is moving to being a full time striker (Ten Hag has mentioned before that he's best on the left anyway).Fair enough but I disagree. The fact he’s not an out an out striker is perfect as it still leaves room for us to buy in the summer without disrupting the team. I don’t see the point in having Memphis for him to then be replaced in the summer and moved down to number 3. It doesn’t show much progress and could cause more harm to team moral. We would add to our unwanted list for the sake of 6 months.
Also as I pointed out we have a real lack of depth in our front line not just number 9. Gakpo improves this. He can occupy all those positions with many different combinations. Memphis doesn’t play that position anymore. Thuram maybe. Ain’t seen him except his World Cup and the other sub looked better.
Eh I don't think we have a lack of depth outside of #9. We have 4 players between 2 positions for the wings, which is perfect. Sancho is going through some shit right now but we don't just eliminate him from squad numbers on the back of that. Garnacho is a high potential 18 year old (IMO has a higher potential than Gakpo due to his pace and dribbling which Gakpo doesn't have). Gakpo hasn't really ever shown he can actually play as a #9. He's done OK on the right. Best on the left. For Netherlands he played in a free role and didn't do that great, but scored some nice goals. If we buy him and he's not meant as a striker, then we'll end up needing to sell one of the others as you can't keep 5 players happy between 2 positions, unless Rashford is moving to being a full time striker (Ten Hag has mentioned before that he's best on the left anyway).
For me Gakpo is just not good enough for the money that we'll spend, and for the squad place that he'll tie up. We need a more dynamic player than him. It looks like it'll happen but I really hope I'm wrong, because I don't see him being more than squad player quality, and we simply can't afford to keep spending 50m+ on squad player quality players. We'll have an attacker group of all who are decent, but nobody who is truly good enough to cement a key role for themselves, and we'll have spent 300m bringing them all together.