horsechoker
The Caf's Ezza.
April Fools is in 9 days
The Glazers wouldn't, would they?
The Glazers wouldn't, would they?
Elliott will have had discussions, likely for hours too. It's just that it wasn't to the knowledge of the media. Do you not think that they couldnt have conducted them without the knowledge of the media/public?
We heard about those discussion because the Glazers wanted us to.
They provide financing on terms of being paid back more then they provide after a certain period of time, essentially a loan - is that hard to understand?So how will they get a return?
Elliott ill have spent full days at the club too, is my point. They weren't just at the game.I’m not debating that. It’s you trying to frame that them going to a game is some kind of huge tell that this was an elaborate ploy not to sell all along..
Despite SJ and JR spending full days at the club.
You are bang on the money. It was always stated they wished to remain if the likes of Elliott were willing to finance.
As a fanbase we are so desperate to see them leave that confirmation bias made many believe that the likeliest outcome was a sale. That was never the case.
So like debt?They provide financing on terms of being paid back more then they provide after a certain period of time, essentially a loan - is that hard to understand?
They provide financing on terms of being paid back more then they provide after a certain period of time, essentially a loan - is that hard to understand?
How much would Raine want if after all this the Glazers had wasted their time?
I presume they don't work on a no win, no fee basis.
4 of the 6 siblings , we have been told from the same multiple sources, are desperate to sell. You think they’ll be happy being paid out far less than a full sale? Ok cool, seems legit
they’re selling. This is all posturing.
zero concerns that the Glazers won't sell
Wish I could share your optimism but on analysis of all weve heard since the start I dont think they are selling at all.4 of the 6 siblings , we have been told from the same multiple sources, are desperate to sell. You think they’ll be happy being paid out far less than a full sale? Ok cool, seems legit
they’re selling. This is all posturing.
So the the Premier League would have no issue seeing us plunge further into debt if a minority stake is sought from an investment group?
I am yet to be read how this Elliot financing would work.
Are they going to use the sold equity to finance the stadium and Elliot finances a loan for buying out the other Glazers? Because surely they still want to go and I cannot imagine they'd turn down the 5bn offer.
I am yet to be convinced and read how this Elliot financing would work.
Are they going to use the sold equity to finance the stadium and Elliot finances a loan for buying out the other Glazers? Because surely they still want to go and I cannot imagine they'd turn down the 5bn offer.
They provide financing on terms of being paid back more then they provide after a certain period of time, essentially a loan - is that hard to understand?
Yes, absolutely.So like debt?
Raine are obviously in on this.How much would Raine want if after all this the Glazers had wasted their time?
I presume they don't work on a no win, no fee basis.
No no no. Debt is bad. It’s a loan, not debt. Never debt.So like debt?
Aah, no wonder he's full of shitHarold looks remarkably like Conor McGregor
Of course. Why would they? It's all legit and City can keep walking the league after their short intermission this year.So the the Premier League would have no issue seeing us plunge further into debt if a minority stake is sought from an investment group?
So the the Premier League would have no issue seeing us plunge further into debt if a minority stake is sought from an investment group?
They will own shares - with investment in the club value will go up. I still think the glazers believe some iteration of the ESL is a matter of time too, seeing us jet to every corner of the globe playing competitive matches. Worst case they take a larger chunk of the club in the future for their investment.With what fecking money!!? 2bn loan on a stadium, yeah we can pay that back easy Look at our finances, they've hardly serviced the debt already on the club and have taken dividends out year after year!! We've taken loans out to buy players ffs!!
Who is paying it back? If it’s the Glazers with what? They’re asset rich not cash rich. And if it’s the club then how can it pay the old debt, the new debt and also simultaneously afford to compete with the super wealthy coming into the league? It simply can’t. So why will the other glazer siblings refuse to cash in on a 5bn offer to stay at a club that’s going to become less competitive and thus reducing the asset value? Minority investment makes zero sense.They provide financing on terms of being paid back more then they provide after a certain period of time, essentially a loan - is that hard to understand?
Honestly, you're writing some absolute bollocks. People have explained to you why your suggestion is unlikely and all you've come back with is your 'feeling'.Wish I could share your optimism but on analysis of all weve heard since the start I dont think they are selling at all.
I'll log back on here once we have a definitive answer but I've seen enough to be convinced of what is actually going on here.
Wish I could share your optimism but on analysis of all weve heard since the start I dont think they are selling at all.
I'll log back on here once we have a definitive answer but I've seen enough to be convinced of what is actually going on here.
What analysis is that? The word is they've been open to selling as much as any other route.Wish I could share your optimism but on analysis of all weve heard since the start I dont think they are selling at all.
I'll log back on here once we have a definitive answer but I've seen enough to be convinced of what is actually going on here.
They will own shares - with investment in the club value will go up. I still think the glazers believe some iteration of the ESL is a matter of time too, seeing us jet to every corner of the globe playing competitive matches. Worst case they take a larger chunk of the club in the future for their investment.
If you are certain that there is no value then why are there (reportedly) so many investment groups lining up?
The Glazers will still own the controlling stake in the club. The clubs wealth - assets, revenue, naming rights, shares etc is all theirs. There is sufficient worth in Elliott seeking minority investment and making cash available immediately.Who is paying it back? If it’s the Glazers with what? They’re asset rich not cash rich. And if it’s the club then how can it pay the old debt, the new debt and also simultaneously afford to compete with the super wealthy coming into the league? It simply can’t. So why will the other glazer siblings refuse to cash in on a 5bn offer to stay at a club that’s going to become less competitive and thus reducing the asset value? Minority investment makes zero sense.
All you're contributing is 'this is posturing' with no thought process behind that other than SJR, SJ spent a few hours at the clubSo now you’re just making more things up
The Glazers will still own the controlling stake in the club. The clubs wealth - assets, revenue, naming rights, shares etc is all theirs. There is sufficient worth in Elliott seeking minority investment and making cash available immediately.
My thoughts are below. They remain unchanged.What analysis is that? The word is they've been open to selling as much as any other route.
We can only speculate but by currents thoughts are this -
Balancing the Glazers only two interests, above, and knowing that they can't increase the value of the club themselves with the necessary investment etc. I suspect that there is a US based consortium who have been lined up, who are willing to put in the $5-6bn to buy a majority stake and upgrade OT and facilities etc, all with a view to increasing the clubs value over the next 5-10 years. This will in turn increase the value of the Glazers remaining stake, so that the club can be sold for a much larger profit ($10-12bn perhaps) in future - a relatively short term investment that generates a huge profit for all involved.
- As reported as far back as last year, the Glazers may already have a buyer lined up for united, original reports were that this would most likely be an American consortium.
- Raine Group are being used for the sale who only progressed US based bids for Chelsea.
- Raine Group did not want news of bids from JR Qatar to be made public - why? because fans may unanimously throw their weight behind one of the bids and reduce the Glazers bargaining position. There are two other significant bids that are private.
- The Glazers only concern is money - that is getting the most they can now and balancing this with not losing out in case the clubs value sky-rockets in the next 5-10 years.
- There is now talk of the glazers wanting to retain a decent sized stake, if retaining not control (say 30% as an example).
I essentially think that the public process that is being followed may be a forgone conclusion with the likeliest scenario being US based consortium ownership and the Glazers milking their remaining stake in the coming years. We might end up with several parasitic US billionaires trying to flip a quick profit on the club.
My biggest issue with this is I don't think being the best team/club in the world is a motivation of the above.
All you're contributing is 'this is posturing' with no thought process behind that other than SJR, SJ spent a few hours at the club
Yeah I read that, I just think you're mistaking analysis with crazy conspiracy nonsense.My thoughts are below. They remain unchanged.
I can't see how its possible. Banks/Vulture funds would be charging interest rates of 15%+ for loans in the current climate.
Yes. In exchange for what? It’s either a loan with high interest rates - which I replied with the logic of why that makes zero sense as who pays that loan? Or it’s with equity which involves the Glazer siblings of which a majority want to sell turning down a 5bn plus offer to instead give up billions in equity to invest in the club. Erm…what? That’s quite a business shift.The Glazers will still own the controlling stake in the club. The clubs wealth - assets, revenue, naming rights, shares etc is all theirs. There is sufficient worth in Elliott seeking minority investment and making cash available immediately.