Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
But being owned by an oil state wouldn’t stops you watching at all?
I’ve said I don’t want a cheat code (apart from my moment of weakness after the Liverpool game) but at least Qatar wouldn’t be laughing in my face as a fan.
I never said I wouldn’t take Jim as an owner?
 
But they haven't been confirmed have they?

I don't blame the bidders in this respect. The Glazers have blatantly tried to open up a bidding theatre for the club to drive the price up. Now I think bidders are actively briefing negatively about the deal to make the Glazers panic. I still think they intend to sell. All logic says they need to sell.
With respect, there has been a consistent line that the glazers could well stay. At what point do we stop saying it’s negotiation tactics and accept that it’s likely they are going nowhere?
 
I’ve said I don’t want a cheat code (apart from my moment of weakness after the Liverpool game) but at least Qatar wouldn’t be laughing in my face as a fan.
I never said I wouldn’t take Jim as an owner?

I can understand people walking away if they find the new ownership situation intolerable. Everyone has their line in the sand. What I don’t get is this threat to walk away if things stay exactly the same as it has been while you’ve followed the club for the last 18 years?
 
Keegan and the rest of the media showed how much they really know about this process last night. They queued up to announce the bids were in and then had to backtrack.

They are just relaying the latest group text. It's not over if a D list journalist says the Glazers want more money
 
Does anybody know what sort of fees the Raine group will be charging for their work?
 
If they stay in control it's the last straw for me. Cant despise the cnuts any further.
Control being the operative word.

If a full sale is off the cards, Ineos could well still purchase the shares of the rumoured reluctant remainer siblings.
 
With respect, there has been a consistent line that the glazers could well stay. At what point do we stop saying it’s negotiation tactics and accept that it’s likely they are going nowhere?
When it's been confirmed I imagine.
 
But they haven't been confirmed have they?

I don't blame the bidders in this respect. The Glazers have blatantly tried to open up a bidding theatre for the club to drive the price up. Now I think bidders are actively briefing negatively about the deal to make the Glazers panic. I still think they intend to sell. All logic says they need to sell.
You make this sound like a transfer saga.
 
Keegan and the rest of the media showed how much they really know about this process last night. They queued up to announce the bids were in and then had to backtrack.

They are just relaying the latest group text. It's not over if a D list journalist says the Glazers want more money
I don’t know why so many are melting down over a daily fail reporter. Zero perspective
 
We can only speculate but by currents thoughts are this -
  • As reported as far back as last year, the Glazers may already have a buyer/financing lined up for united, original reports were that this would most likely be an American consortium.
  • Raine Group are being used for the sale who only progressed US based bids for Chelsea.
  • Raine Group did not want news of bids from JR Qatar to be made public - why? because fans may unanimously throw their weight behind one of the bids and reduce the Glazers bargaining position. There are two other significant bids that are private.
  • The Glazers only concern is money - that is getting the most they can now and balancing this with not losing out in case the clubs value sky-rockets in the next 5-10 years.
  • There is now talk of the glazers wanting to retain a decent sized stake, if retaining not control (say 30% as an example).
Balancing the Glazers only two interests, above, and knowing that they can't increase the value of the club themselves with the necessary investment etc. I suspect that there is a US based consortium who have been lined up, who are willing to put in the $5-6bn to buy a majority stake and upgrade OT and facilities etc, all with a view to increasing the clubs value over the next 5-10 years. This will in turn increase the value of the Glazers remaining stake, so that the club can be sold for a much larger profit ($10-12bn perhaps) in future - a relatively short term investment that generates a huge profit for all involved.

I essentially think that the public process that is being followed may be a forgone conclusion with the likeliest scenario being US based consortium ownership and the Glazers milking their remaining stake in the coming years. We might end up with several parasitic US billionaires trying to flip a quick profit on the club.
This.
 
With respect, there has been a consistent line that the glazers could well stay. At what point do we stop saying it’s negotiation tactics and accept that it’s likely they are going nowhere?

When they definitively come out and say that they are going nowhere and are seeking investment, just as FSG did with Liverpool. Do you seriously believe that they have let these potential buyers spend hours at Old Trafford going through all the accounts if the gap for negotiation is £1.5 billion pounds? Their reputation as businessmen would be absolutely trashed. They know with absolute certainly that they will never get a better price for the club than right now. They have never wanted to invest their own money in the club and this is what has to happen for Utd to increase in value. This won't happen if they get further outside investment which would mean further increased debt and their asset value would plummet.

I still maintain its negotiation, purely because them staying is economically bonkers.

Edit: Bare in mind as well that these bidders will have finance people helping them put their bids together who are likely to know the true value of the club. The Raine Group probably know the value is less than what the Glazers would hope for but their job is to get the Glazers the best possible price.

The fact that the 2nd bids are higher is a win for the Raine Group and Glazers in that respect. Now it is just a question of whether they believe these bidders can be encouraged to go further. With the Qatari bid being described as a 'final bid' and INEOS briefing they won't be reckless, they know its not likely they can be pushed further. I don't think its likely that the Glazers look at a world record 5bn bid for an asset they put only 200m of their own money in and go "nah that's not enough bruh"
 
Last edited:
I can understand people walking away if they find the new ownership situation intolerable. Everyone has their line in the sand. What I don’t get is this threat to walk away if things stay exactly the same as it has been while you’ve followed the club for the last decade or two?
It won’t be the same though. They waved a sale in our face without any intention to follow through only to (probably) load more debt on the club and make things worse than they are even now. They will not sell shares and use their own money to invest. It’ll be parlayed into some loan and we’ll be left rotting from the inside out.
There’s every chance we will be asset stripped in the years to come and I don’t want to be around to support it.
 
I don’t know why so many are melting down over a daily fail reporter. Zero perspective

It's what redcafe does isn't it? Ridicule any positive news but take any negative as fact and commence meltdown?

Whether it's transfers, matchday or takeover.
 
Presumably all that's actually going on here is that we are finally at the stage where numbers are being seriously discussed and so all parties are briefing that they are willing to walk away, because it would be a rather odd negotiation tactic to brief you were happy to conclude a deal regardless of the price.
 
It’s increasingly looking like the Glazers have no intention of selling the club and are just using this bidding process as a way to establish the market value of the club for minority investment.
The Qatari will move onto Liverpool now I reckon

1) The Glazers have never reinvested monies into the club. Why now?

2) Liverpool aren’t for sale. FSG very publicly stated.

Said from day 1 that this was predetermined and the glazers had were set on finding a finance option to remain at the club. Been shouted down on here continuously for saying that.

Worst fears confirmed.

Except nothing has been confirmed at all..

The doubts about the sale happening have now been expressed by multiple reliable sources. It was always the most likely outcome, despite what many on this board claimed. The Glazers' approach towards the process has been wholly unbecoming, reminiscent of their running of the club, and their demands have been completely unrealistic. Because they never really needed to sell, and the current successes on the pitch have definitely played a part.

They will either reach some sort of deal with the likes of Elliot, or just call it off entirely. I believe the announcement will be before the month is out.

Complete and utter nonsense.

I’m positive some here love the negativity and enjoy it.
 


If this bloke is a good authority then this is very telling. Why would they be wasting their time unless the Glazers have no intention of a full sale, no matter the price?

Do not underestimate Elliott group being at a home fixture recently - that is is significant and something that neither SJR or SJ were offered.
 
With respect, there has been a consistent line that the glazers could well stay. At what point do we stop saying it’s negotiation tactics and accept that it’s likely they are going nowhere?

It's the same shit as the De Jong saga. Some people see things that are not there in every word. Double meanings, conspiracies, negotiation tactics. Then it turned out it was exactly what was said multiple times - he isn't interested.

It's exactly the same now. The reports the Glazers will not sell unless their demands are completely met have been consistent throughout the entire process, and reiterated multiple times by reliable sources. The bids will not meet their demands because their demands are outrageous. And the Glazers absolutely do not need to sell, much like Barcelona didn't need to last summer, despite the way some people talked with absolute certainty about it and the multiple pages of wanna-be financial analysis. Again, the same as now.

If the bidders don't meet the Glazers' demands, there isn't going to be a sale. It's as simple as that.
 
I think its a last push negotiation tactic to find middle ground from the Glazers.

I find it a bit nuts that they'd risk pissing off key investors and strategic relationships at this point.
 
It won’t be the same though. They waved a sale in our face without any intention to follow through only to (probably) load more debt on the club and make things worse than they are even now. They will not sell shares and use their own money to invest. It’ll be parlayed into some loan and we’ll be left rotting from the inside out.
There’s every chance we will be asset stripped in the years to come and I don’t want to be around to support it.

Dunno what you mean about “their own money” but selling equity to raise funds to invest in the business is exactly what they’ll be doing if they don’t sell the whole thing. And that’s just a basic business practice. What’s your problem with it?
 
When they definitively come out and say that they are going nowhere and are seeking investment, just as FSG did with Liverpool. Do you seriously believe that they have let these potential buyers spend hours at Old Trafford going through all the accounts if the gap for negotiation is £1.5 billion pounds? Their reputation as businessmen would be absolutely trashed. They know with absolute certainly that they will never get a better price for the club than right now. They have never wanted to invest their own money in the club and this is what has to happen for Utd to increase in value. This won't happen if they get further outside investment which would mean further increased debt and their asset value would plummet.

I still maintain its negotiation, purely because them staying is economically bonkers.
So you're admitting you have no ability to look at the bigger picture, of all we've been told since the start and form an opinion until you are told in an official statement? No point being on a discussion board then I guess.

I think it's plausible they entertained SJR and SJ purely to make it look as though they had conducted a thorough process. Reputation wouldn't be trashed at all - they can say they assessed all options and decided they would seek minority investment, which I firmly believe was the intention from the outset.
 


If this bloke is a good authority then this is very telling. Why would they be wasting their time unless the Glazers have no intention of a full sale, no matter the price?

Do not underestimate Elliott group being at a home fixture recently - that is is significant and something that neither SJR or SJ were offered.


No. they were given 10 hours at the club..

What you on about here
 
You all need to chill the feck out, all this shit is just posturing.

That was my thought. If they want to sell surely the huge profit they will make at anything from the current bids and above will be enough for them? I'd guess (but of course could well be wrong) is that all that is going on now is finalising the price.
 
Come gather round children, it's high time ye learned bout a hero name Jassim
And a Villain named Joel
We'll march till we drop
The girls and the fellas
We'll fight to the death
Or else fold like umbrellas
So we'll march day and night
By the mega club store.
They have the club
But we have the power.
 
If this bloke is a good authority then this is very telling. Why would they be wasting their time unless the Glazers have no intention of a full sale, no matter the price?

Do not underestimate Elliott group being at a home fixture recently - that is is significant and something that neither SJR or SJ were offered.

If my grandfather had wheels he would be a bike.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.