KiD MoYeS
Good Craig got his c'nuppins
Nothing changes with Qatari ownership, for me. Just another owner to want out, although I accept I'll be in the minority because money will be pumped into the club.
I think his dad, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani, is also helping out.So that £7bn on top of the purchase price?!!
Tell me the bid is state funded without saying state funded.
No it won'tNo. Refinancing existing debt on INEOS books. United would be debt free.
Fair enough, but what’s your alternative? Being owned by a hedge fund where the club is treated as nothing more than an asset?Nothing changes with Qatari ownership, for me. Just another owner to want out, although I accept I'll be in the minority because money will be pumped into the club.
Daley was the 2nd British million quid player after Trevor Francis, most, including a lot of City fans, thought it was bonkers!Love it. And I don’t get to say it too often these days, but that one was a few years before my time.
No it won't
I think his dad, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani, is also helping out.
I don't have an alternative, I'm not a multi-billionaire. But I refuse to believe that dirty money is the only option. There are plenty of clubs celebrating massive success over the last twenty years without blood money.Fair enough, but what’s your alternative? Being owned by a hedge fund where the club is treated as nothing more than an asset?
Every single oppo fan I guess?Anyone else hoping the Glazers stay?
Rival's fans, of course.Anyone else hoping the Glazers stay?
The entire population of Liverpool?Anyone else hoping the Glazers stay?
I think his dad, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani, is also helping out.
I don't want Qatari ownership but don't want Glazers to stay. Their time is up. They had their chance and they made their best attempt at running the club into the dirt. They need to go.Anyone else hoping the Glazers stay?
6 billion quid is a lot more than 6 billion dollars!Surely the Glazers would weigh things up in their currency and would want $6bn rather than the reported £6bn which is mostly being reported by people from within the UK.
It's like Kaveh (Sky) said, nobody really knows what the Glazers want. And I think a bid of £5bn (over $6bn) will see them sell. I fully expect the Glazers to stretch this out and make it seem like there's more bidders than there actually is to create a ghost bidding scenario which has been reported on.
I don't see the Glazers staying as owners either as has been reported. I think that's another ploy to extract more money out of a would be buyer.
I think his dad, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani, is also helping out.
Like?I don't have an alternative, I'm not a multi-billionaire. But I refuse to believe that dirty money is the only option. There are plenty of clubs celebrating massive success over the last twenty years without blood money.
Like?
If you read again my point was about language used. It’s stupid and derogatory to say ‘a division of a chemical company’ when we know Ineos is already heavily invested in sport. It’s also more than likely that United would stand on its own.We would become a division of a chemical company.
I fail to see how that is "shitting on INEOS" hence why I said his reaction to that was disproportionate.
Splitting hairs. I think you must be the only person outraged by this "language"If you read again my point was about language used. It’s stupid and derogatory to say ‘a division of a chemical company’ when we know Ineos is already heavily invested in sport. It’s also more than likely that United would stand on its own.
Even with Qatari ownership it's very likely, if not a certainty that we would have debt.
Even Citys owners have taken on debt, as well as allowed outside investment previously, despite their vast wealth.
The entire "debt free" argument is flawed.
In the most basic terms though, both SJR and Jassim would initially remove the debt from the club.
They are asking for big trouble with statements like this
It's not about someone pumping money into the club, it's about clearing the debt and allowing us to spend our revenue on the club rather than funding the scumbag Glazer debt repayments and dividendsNothing changes with Qatari ownership, for me. Just another owner to want out, although I accept I'll be in the minority because money will be pumped into the club.
What's the source for this?Sounds worryingly like the Board (the two main Glazers) are preferring the “investment” options (your Elliotts) rather than an outright sale.
Not sure the Glazers even know about said polls to be honest.
Though maybe it's time we polled the Glazers?
I know that, but Americans don't measure currency in pound sterling but rather in the US Dollar. So it's plausible to suggest that they'd be briefing something reflecting a amount in US Dollars rather than pound sterling.6 billion quid is a lot more than 6 billion dollars!
That's an extremely pedantic thing to say. Sure if short term borrowing costs are low, you use debt to fund your business. Every single business has a revolving line of credit from banks. And sure that's technically debt.
That's also quite a bit different from a leveraged takeover. That's what most people complain about.
No it doesn't.Sounds worryingly like the Board (the two main Glazers) are preferring the “investment” options (your Elliotts) rather than an outright sale.
Pretty sure the Glazers know how the fans feel about them.