Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you're going to google something, then maybe you should actually make sure you know that the bonds matured in 2017.

:rolleyes:


Why don't you open up our 20-F and actually look up our current situation.



Why are you even trying to argue with someone who clearly knows a feck lot more than you about these topics?

Are you that fecking stubborn?

Not really even sure why you're being an arse to people on this board, when they clearly have valid opinions and facts.
It's mental, isn't it? It's one thing having moral reservations about Qatar (I personally don't care at this point ) but to so foolishly push an agenda based on wrongful information and misrepresent just how much shit we are in financially is infuriating.

Fair enough you want some kind of organic fairytale but we should be under no illusion what this means for United. One thing it does mean is no PL title anytime soon.
 
If you want Ratcliffe you’re absolutely insane. Those shareholders are going to demand return.
 


So revealed by 'someone' who told Laurie Whitwell?

I mean it may be the case at least in the short term but I can't see anyone paying £5-6b for United and then leaving that debt in place. You'd imagine they'd maybe look to refinance it and move it over to Ineos along with whatever they're borrowing to buy the club.
 
Anytime there’s a report of either side being confident or ‘x has impressed‘ during recent meetings we get the copy/paste response of them not entirely sure of a full sale

Bollocks they can’t wait to get the billions and run they’re playing hard ball trying to get the best price it’s so obvious
 
I've seen that. He's also suspicious of the rumours about the 5 to 8 bidders. Seems to think there's only two. I think he's right.

Thought since I heard it its yet another tactic to get the Qataris to pay out as much as possible
 
It’s pretty obvious there’s only two bidders.

Glazers are trying to extrapolate the highest bid from either party.

Ask yourself if there are other bidders why haven’t they been to visit OT and Carrington in a convoy of SUVs pretty hard to avoid the press at the moment around this.
 
It’s pretty obvious there’s only two bidders.

Glazers are trying to extrapolate the highest bid from either party.

Ask yourself if there are other bidders why haven’t they been to visit OT and Carrington in a convoy of SUVs pretty hard to avoid the press at the moment around this.

Other bidders have been on site. It was reported last week and again yesterday. They just didn't pose for photos.
 
If you want Ratcliffe you’re absolutely insane. Those shareholders are going to demand return.

You mean the two guys who went to Old Trafford with him? I’m sure they know the only return from this transaction is long term, apart from any prestige or greenwashing elements.
 
This goes back to a question I keep asking. If a huge investment isn't expected (call it infinite spend or whatever you like) why even back the Qatari bid?


So state-ownership is fine as long as it's a big club? That's quite an odd line to draw.


City's success was slated before the accusations of cheating ever came out.

For the record, I'm not anti-Qatar or pro-INEOS. Either could suck as owners or be amazing. You also won't see me making any moral arguments against either party. What I'm trying to understand is the hypocrisy and mental gymnastics behind wanting Qatar ownership and the constant bashing of INEOS.
Practically speaking it’s a huge difference because the club’s status has been achieved without being solely propped up by independent wealth.
 
Well maybe but the Glazers shares gives them 100% control either way and there is probably a process in place that any new owner has to buy all the other shares anyway.

But even if there isnt I don't realistically see either party spending £5-6b on United and then not looking to get ownership of the other 31% at some point. There would be no massive rush as any new infrastructure would still take a few years to get started.
I think both SJR and Sheik Jassim will buy 100% of the club eventually before starting any big project with the infrastructure.
 
I doubt there would be.

There really wouldn’t be as this is probably what they wanted after the poor first round of bids, Raine group would probably recommend they make Qatar the preferred bidder and try and negotiate up to £5.75bn or $7bn and then use PR by saying they, the Glaziers have sold their controlling shares in the club for £6.3bn or $7.8bn as the debt of £620m will be conveniently rolled into the sale price.
 
Howsen is such a wanker. Is there anything he won’t pretend to know about?

He is (hate the way he constantly drops in his group chat with Rio every 5 seconds), but think he's trying to clarify what he's heard there and asking
 
Why are you even trying to argue with someone who clearly knows a feck lot more than you about these topics?

Are you that fecking stubborn?

Not really even sure why you're being an arse to people on this board, when they clearly have valid opinions and facts.

Whoa whoa whoa, slow down fella….

Who exactly is “being an arse”?

Not the brightest bulb are you?
Imagine thinking our loans were fixed term rates :lol:

You're borrowing from a fecking investment bank not your local regional bank mortgage :lol:

Knows more? I’m not convinced you even understood the passage you posted.

I mean, just three posts earlier you joked that we don’t have fixed rate because we borrowed from an investment bank not your regional bank manager, and now you’ve posted a passage there showing the a large portion of out debt is in fact, at fixed.

And in the passage it actually states:

We have entered into an interest rate swap related to a portion of our secured term loan facility that involves the exchange of floating for fixed rate interest payments in order to reduce interest rate volatility.

And you think that’s proof you know more?

No wonder the “not brightest bulb” is stubborn when debating with Mr laughing smilie who name calls and who claims he “knows more” on a subject he clearly knows little about.
So just a tip, maybe next time you wanna claim someone is being an arse, you should maybe look in the mirror at your own behaviour first?
 
Last edited:
It's mental, isn't it? It's one thing having moral reservations about Qatar (I personally don't care at this point ) but to so foolishly push an agenda based on wrongful information and misrepresent just how much shit we are in financially is infuriating.

Fair enough you want some kind of organic fairytale but we should be under no illusion what this means for United. One thing it does mean is no PL title anytime soon.

Come on that's nonsense. We spend enough right now under the most hated ownership in the Prem to win a title.
 
It's mental, isn't it?

It’s pretty mental that a poster just 4 posts back laughed at the idea we have fixed term rates as this is “investment banks not your regional bank mortgage” then posting a passage confirming that United did a deal to swap for fixed rates to reduce interest rate volatility, and both that poster and yourself have not even realised what he posted.

Aye, that’s mental, but that’s this thread for ya.
 
It’s pretty mental that a poster just 4 posts back laughed at the idea we have fixed term rates as this is “investment banks not your regional bank mortgage” then posting a passage confirming that United did a deal to swap for fixed rates to reduce interest rate volatility, and both that poster and yourself have not even realised what he posted.

Aye, that’s mental, but that’s this thread for ya.

Oh my days :lol:

Just stop regulus. Please.

Why on earth would you need an interest rate swap to reduce interest rate volatility if YOU HAVE FIXED RATES? They obviously had non-fixed rates to start with hence why they had to do a partial hedge.

This doesn't even have anything to do with finance. Its just common sense.

Please just stop.

I find it just incredible how some posters can't even admit they are wrong. Even when its something they clearly aren't knowledgable about.

All this to what? Save face on the internet? Win an internet argument?
 
Why on earth would you need an interest rate swap to reduce interest rate volatility if YOU HAVE FIXED RATES?

We entered a deal to swap to fixed rates for a portion of our loan that was on variable rates, exactly as it states.

Are you now gonna pretend you didn’t laugh your head off a few posts back at the idea of us having fixed rates?

Oh my fecking days indeed. Talk about not admitting when you were wrong when you clearly made yourself look daft with all those laughing smilies about this not being your regional bank mortgage :wenger:

What was it again “Imagine thinking we have fixed rates :lol:”.

Keep laughing, it covers your insecurities on this one.
 
When did Ratcliffe/Ineos reveal this?
When they made the 1st bid and said they won't be putting any new debt on the club but didn't say anything about clearing the debt that's already there. There's also been multiple reports that they won't be paying it off as part of the takeover
 
Its obviously state backed. Just like almost everything else of worth in Qatar.

But I suppose to appease the FA they still have to make an effort to at least seem independent. Appearances and all that.

Its no different from what the saudis did.
Not sure which countries don't have thousands of deaths behind its wealth and prohibitive laws for gay people and women at some point in time?

What has that got to do with the Qatari bidders anyways? Is this Sheikh Jassim guy imparting these rules? Was he responsible for these deaths? Or shall we just lump them all together. Qataris are all one and the same.

Again.
 
We entered a deal to swap to fixed rates for a portion of our loan that was on variable rates, exactly as it states.

Are you now gonna pretend you didn’t laugh your head off a few posts back at the idea of us having fixed rates?

Oh my fecking days indeed.

And you're the guy who thought we were on fixed rates :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

You don't even know what you're arguing about :lol:

You've literally just proved my point.
 
Wow.

Do we have loans on fixed rates?

Simple answer, yes or no? the clue is in the passage you posted.

We DO NOT HAVE LOANS ON A FIXED RATE.

We entered into an interest rate swap. WHICH IS ALSO SUBJECT TO VARIABLES and NOT A PERFECT HEDGE.

That in itself will also cost us and is not a risk free instrument.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.