Cantonagotmehere
Full Member
You need bankers for deals like this. It doesn't mean, this guy will be instructing Ten Hag to revert to a 4-4-2 formation should the deal go through
This won't go over well on here. But is 100% true of course.
You need bankers for deals like this. It doesn't mean, this guy will be instructing Ten Hag to revert to a 4-4-2 formation should the deal go through
To be fair how else do you move 6b around? Would you not need big players to move that much cash?Full on Bank of America posse (Shabaz worked there for over 20 years). I thought bankers were the devil, but I doubt it will be perceived this way in this instance.
Also I wish the media would stop referring to the Nine Two Foundation as something real. It doesn't exist outside of paper, and it will only exist in any real form (and even that will be minor) if this deal goes through.
Yeah. The guys they've assembled seem appropriate. Good luck to them, I hope nothing goes wrong.It's an incredibly vast amount of money and will be very complex as that amount of cash isn't readily available... It will take multiple lawyers, bankers etc to iron it all out and ensure the transaction goes from one to the other smoothly.
I couldn't even tell you a bank that will do such a transaction.
Max protected in a standard account for us plebs is only 85k I believe so imagine the fees, insurance etc in this.. many hands wanting to play in the pie.
Why is Bank of America part of the Qatari bid team???
Andy Currie and John Reece. They are expected to be part of Ineos contingency visiting OT. The positive thing is that the team lead by SJR look stronger then the Qatari one. All owners of I eps are being involved while Jassim had limited himself to send bankers. The downside to that is that Currie and Reece might not be as eager to buy United as Ratcliffe is.
They are advising Sheikh Jassim. (Presumably because he need banking advice even though he is a banker and chairman of a bank)
Not really, a wire is a wire. Of course you need a bank, but that's not what BofA is here for on this deal. They're Qatar's chosen financial adviser on this. INEOS likely will have one too, but bigger deals have been done without a buyside adviser.To be fair how else do you move 6b around? Would you not need big players to move that much cash?
What are they advising on? Value for money I guess. Sending the message they won't overpay.
What if I told you they play 5-a-side on the weekend wearing full United kits?I'm amazed they'd want anything to do with United, Jim will have a tough job selling the dream to the pair of them.
I guess we read bankers and think in simple terms but I thought the club has debts of various sources so any sensible party will have people with the best knowledge of what type these debts are and their obligations / pay off rates etc.Bit confused by all the bankers. Are they advising for a fee, or are they investors? I hope it's the former, as if they're investors they will be looking to make money out of the club. I'm still hoping for someone who isn't in it for that. I get someone more competent than the Glazers might be a step forward over time, but can't help wanting more.
Why is Bank of America part of the Qatari bid team???
They are advising Sheikh Jassim. (Presumably because he need banking advice even though he is a banker and chairman of a bank)
But shouldn't you be doing the buy-in part much earlier? The Qataris maybe be pushing the agenda and want to close it faster. I bet ratcliffe's team will be late on the 1st firm bid/offer like they were with Chelsea.
That's rich coming from youI have never seen so much bad faith arguing as in this thread.
My guess is they are salivating at the potential of mouth-watering transfer funds and just don't want to admit it. At least that's the impression I'm getting.
I'm amazed they'd want anything to do with United, Jim will have a tough job selling the dream to the pair of them.
Yet you could be spending more on official merch than the regular match goer.Tbh I don't see how you can really argue that a fan who attends games regularly isn't more important than one typically watches the game on TV. One of them is paying for tickets and contributing to the actual atmosphere at the game, the other isn't.
And I say that as someone who is neither local nor a regular match-goer.
Obviously you don't need to be a local to be a regular match-goer but basic practicalities and economics mean you're obviously more likely to be.
No wonder you like Jimbo and his "put Manchester back in Manchester United" spiel. You both come across as xenophobic.Here is what I am saying. I will make it 100% crystal clear.
I got tagged by someone who lives thousands of miles away from Manchester about how happy he is supporting Manchester United now his home town heroes might purchase the club. He is buzzing about this.
I don’t see it as anything to brag about at all. The guy lives thousands of miles from the game. He has plenty of local teams he could watch and support. I 100% don’t get the supporting of a team you can’t watch. That’s not xenophobic. That’s what I believe. I don’t get cockneys who support United or Scousers that support United.
For me, your football club is one that is nearby or potentiallypassed on by someone in your family. It’s a way of life that you and people like you go to watch the local match.When some posters enjoy their local team buying a club, some posters enjoy their local team scoring a goal.
I KNOW this means I would alienate a large chunk of our fanbase. I genuinely don’t care. Of course you can support the team from wherever, it is just odd to me.
EDIT: and because of my romantic views of football, I don’t want a regime with thousands of deaths on their hands with anythhing to do with my club. I don’t want a regime with misogynistic, homophobic and hateful laws taking over the club. I would rather not win anything than win something that has been tainted through a morally dubious regime.
Do doctors carry out their own diagnosis and perform medical procedures (in their field) on themselves?They are advising Sheikh Jassim. (Presumably because he need banking advice even though he is a banker and chairman of a bank)
That's rich coming from you![]()
I’d be worried by any doctor who carries out medical procedures in a field to be honest, whether it’s theirs or not.Do doctors carry out their own diagnosis and perform medical procedures (in their field) on themselves?
Do lawyer defend themselves in court?
Just a foolish point fit for the kindergarten.
Is this your way of admitting you've been found out to be chatting shit?I’d be worried by any doctor who carries out medical procedures in a field to be honest, whether it’s theirs or not.
Is there some article that says this or is just what you think?
Yeh I know, typical. But hey, I'm not surprised, some posters are let away with anything on here and the mods do nothing, but when I call one of them out for what they are, I get the warningAnd you’re the one that gets the warning. Amazing. I’ll probably get one for agreeing with you.
Nope, it’s my way of saying not everything has to be taken so seriously. Lighten up!Is this your way of admitting you've been found out to be chatting shit?
Why is Bank of America part of the Qatari bid team???
You can do a deal without financial advisors, plenty of companies do. The doctor analogy is justDo doctors carry out their own diagnosis and perform medical procedures (in their field) on themselves?
Do lawyer defend themselves in court?
Just a foolish point fit for the kindergarten.
You don't need the Global Head of their IB TMT practice for that.There's always a fecking bank involved in everything, earning a cut no doubt. They'll have probably outlined their clients accounts, how much is available in free cash, available to transfer, dates etc.
It's more credible than the Qataris turning up and saying "trust me bro, we got the money, have a look at my bank app", and who would the Glazers trust the most? A big American bank of course!
Did you guys think the Qataris were going to pay with suitcases of cashWhy is Bank of America part of the Qatari bid team???
You can do a deal without financial advisors, plenty of companies do. The doctor analogy is just![]()
They've got some nerve really.
"Alright lads, make a bid for the club. Yeah we know you did that 2 weeks ago but do it again anyway for a laugh, but make it more this time, the first one was just to make sure you're serious."
If you're about to spend billions, you want top brass there, not some intern with no experience of this kind of deal.You don't need the Global Head of their IB TMT practice for that.
If I was a corporate banker doing this kind of deal I’d want to be there in person to trust my expertise and experience.If you're about to spend billions, you want top brass there, not some intern with no experience of this kind of deal.
Maybe if you're buying a shed, yes. But this is some bonkers 'expertise' on display here.You can do a deal without financial advisors, plenty of companies do. The doctor analogy is just![]()
Also, you want your face involved in this deal so everyone knows you brokered it. Great for business.If I was a corporate banker doing this kind of deal I’d want to be there in person to trust my expertise and experience.
You get the bank valuation when you're buying a house because the bank is going to be the one lending you the money, so they do want to appraise the value or they won't underwrite the loan.Erm this is not just any deal its a £5bn deal. Due diligence needs to be done.
Its like when you buy a house, you get a banks valuation.
Those are the only 2 options? BofA IB must be more thinly staffed than I realized.If you're about to spend billions, you want top brass there, not some intern with no experience of this kind of deal.