Licha-Vidic
Last Man Standing 2 finalist 2023/24
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2023
- Messages
- 1,590
Could have used one of the posters on your bedroom wall. You’ve even got loads of wallpaper paste over them alreadyOh dear…..
Some people have no imagination.
Could have used one of the posters on your bedroom wall. You’ve even got loads of wallpaper paste over them already
I'm not a fan of a new minority stake holder being advertised like that, like he's a new signing or something. Seems tacky. Gimicky. Pretty reflective of our characteristics as a club these days I suppose.
What did I accuse him of? He is just another Glazer there is no doubt in that. He is going make the club profitable just like Glazers did so far. Whether he is smart enough to appoint proper people who know football is the question. Personally I think he will do much better than the Glazers(post Fergie) but then the bar is so low even normal decisions will look out of the world genius to us.Those of you that accuse him of this don't seem to realize that the only way for him to make a significant amount of money from this club is by success on the pitch and heavy infrastructural investment. Whether you think his intention is money or footballing success, they sort of go hand in hand.
How do you reckon one becomes a multi-billionaire?I'm sure multi-billionaire Ratcliffe is after United so that he can take his 10-20 million yearly dividends out.
For United to be a profitable thing for him, he'll have to pour money into it for at least a decade and also make sure that we are successful on the pitch...and even this is a highly unlikely scenario, because there are way better investments he and Ineos can make for less money, less risk and higher returns in a shorter amount of time.
71 year old Ratcliffe wants to buy a 6 billion pound asset, so that he can sell it for 10 billion when he's 85? Or he's gonna take yearly dividends so that he can make 15% of his current net worth by the time he's 120 years old? Solid logic there, guys. Like I've said at least 5 times in this thread, you gotta be really dumb to assume Ratcliffe wants to "leech" off the club.
Sorry if my post offended you. I didn’t mean to insult your shitty poster. It’s great, really, good one!Could have used one of the posters on your bedroom wall. You’ve even got loads of wallpaper paste over them already
How do you reckon one becomes a multi-billionaire?
United would be a horrible investment for him, if done for purely financial reasons.How do you reckon one becomes a multi-billionaire?
How do you reckon one becomes a multi-billionaire?
All becomes clear ...
How do you reckon one becomes a multi-billionaire?
I don’t get it.
Probably more likely that the two main stooges never wanted a full sale.Apologies if this has been mentioned in any of the previous 2386 pages but is there any possibility the minority stake Jim is buying might be an attempt to get around the multiple club ownership rules?
I don’t get it.
shit cropping innit?You have to click and expand it in another window.
It says who paid for it..
Thanks Gents. Too lazy to click the tweet/link. That makes more sense now.You have to click and expand it in another window.
I scam vulnerable people and take all of their money.How do you reckon one becomes a multi-billionaire?
Ponzi nonceI scam vulnerable people and take all of their money.
I know its the Mirror but....
United would be a horrible investment for him, if done for purely financial reasons.
I scam vulnerable people and take all of their money.
All becomes clear ...
All I can think when I see it is 'A-haa!'That image on the billboard makes him look like a shyster. "better call Ratcliffe."
Why has some put up an Alan Partridge billboard?
Not by backing a football clubHow do you reckon one becomes a multi-billionaire?
SOS Jimmy