ForeverRed1
Full Member
Come into the club and be absoloutly ruthless or you ain’t winning the fans over In the slightest.
The Glazers already sent him their own SOS mate, and he’s answered it by saving them.
It's happening because something has to happen fairly soon in terms of investment (purely for Glazers' own sake, as explained elsewhere by people better qualified than me, re. their own debts, the club's repayments being due etc) and this, seemingly, is the only thing those goblins will countenance, i.e. the one option where they're still being able to extract form the club and pray for the value to inflate even further but don't have to worry about the aggressive takeover bringing in a typical fund would entail sooner or later.I just don’t think this is happening.
Can he play as a #8?SOS Jimmy
It’s true.
I just don’t think this is happening.
Can he play as a #8?
Save this til after Anfield so the new owner has easier fixtures to bed in. New owner bounce for West Ham away.
The Glazers already sent him their own SOS mate, and he’s answered it by saving them.
I think that poster is still upset that United haven’t been turned into a sports washing brand.
A #8 would be more impactful, but Jimmy B does seem rather tall in photos. Absolute scenes when we learn he has purchased a 25% stake solely to insert himself as United's new target man.He probably be more mobile than Rashers. Deffo Martial.
A #8 would be more impactful, but Jimmy B does seem rather tall in photos. Absolute scenes when we learn he has purchased a 25% stake solely to insert himself as United's new target man.
He'll own 25%, so not like he can do as he likes...Come into the club and be absoloutly ruthless or you ain’t winning the fans over In the slightest.
Still less aggravating than being dropped for fecking Tony Martial, no?Hojlund will be furious.
Still less aggravating than being dropped for fecking Tony Martial, no?
The only consensus I have seen is a general feeling there is another twist yet to come with how long it has been since the last update. I definitely believe there is a lot more to this than we have been led to believe. Let's just hope it's a surprise for the positive...Like many I’ve completely lost faith that anything is actually happening with this
But what’s the general consensus from Twitter etc regarding a timeframe?
Looking forward to Torino vs Atalanta, are you.Big day tomorrow.
Probably should have waited till after Wednesday nightAhh, the big news we were waiting for. Did anybody not see this coming?
Please summarise. I’m so tired of itSome good stuff in that article
Like this snippetPlease summarise. I’m so tired of it
Sir Jim is understood to be committed to investing additional sums in future, although it is unclear whether these will be publicly discussed at the time of the stake purchase.
This fella only reports it when it's about to happen. I can believe this.
Then Ineos would sue the Glazers. Input/control will of course be defined in the contracts at the time of the stake acquisition.So, what happens if he slides his 25% investment in their but receives absolutely no input or control over anything, so it’s you BAU for the Glazers? Where do we go from there?
And what IF this has all been papertalk and Ratcliffe wants no control?Then Ineos would sue the Glazers. Input/control will of course be defined in the contracts at the time of the stake acquisition.