What makes you think Ratcliffe will be throwing any money around as a minority owner? Whilst the media is working overtime in selling the need for a footballing structure and INEOS as the pre-planned solution to aid all of Utd's problems, people need to take a step back and look at what is actually happening and more specifically - what is not happening. Fans are no longer asking the important questions surrounding this pending deal - the debt, is it a takeover or investment for the Glazers to stay afloat, infrastructure plans and ambition.
There is no compelling evidence to any of those questions - only answers to questions that might not actually need answering beyond paying lip service to get fans on side of a deal that ultimately keeps the Glazers in charge. As long as that is the case, the direction will always be commercial ambition and not what is ultimately best for Manchester United Football Club which is a clean slate entirely and a full focus on restoring the club to what it was before that family stole it and then push it forward into the 21st Century as the benchmark for others to follow once again. Ratcliffe isn't coming in as a minority investor to clear the debt and pump money in. People are quick to point to the fact that Ratcliffe wouldn't be doing this if it didn't mean ultimate control in the future but forget to ask themselves what the Glazers aim is and if it's not selling the whole club now for £5b+ and £800m of debt clearance then they're not selling to Ratcliffe in a few years from now for anything less than that but significantly more. Why would one of the most successful businessman in the UK sign up to a deal like that? It's far more likely that he's paying a premium to own a piece of one of the biggest clubs in the world and play football manager whilst working with the Glazers to grow the brand so everyone with shares can milk the cow again.