stevoc
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2011
- Messages
- 22,707
This is as good as it gets, what's higher? Financial Times? Economist? WSJ? Bloomberg?
But that only says they are negotiating to be granted exclusive negotiations. Doesn't it?
This is as good as it gets, what's higher? Financial Times? Economist? WSJ? Bloomberg?
This is happening
This is as good as it gets, what's higher? Financial Times? Economist? WSJ? Bloomberg?
Bless you.This is happening
You do you, but for me it would be more like we finally got to play without our owners holding us back. I don't buy that they will cheat to get us players, they don't need to - instead they will remove the restrictions the Glazers have put on us.Yup. Like you go to talk shit to a Liverpool fan after beating them - except now they just say "yeah well you're an oil club and have unlimited funds to do this so are you really happy"... You can't even respond to it. The whole social element of football, being proud to win, fighting your corner etc is all in the dust now. It's just like a private thing I'll keep to myself now basically.
Yup. Like you go to talk shit to a Liverpool fan after beating them - except now they just say "yeah well you're an oil club and have unlimited funds to do this so are you really happy"... You can't even respond to it. The whole social element of football, being proud to win, fighting your corner etc is all in the dust now. It's just like a private thing I'll keep to myself now basically.
If that's what he meant then he needs to stfu or start doing his job, it's not diffictult to find clubs or franchises that are or have been sold in the past 2 to 3 years and see how long or difficult the process was. Honestly this sales, exposed how incompetent the sport press is.
At this point anything the British press say is guesswork. The likes of Ornstein and Hirst included.
And what is your opinion on City? We'll deserved success? Adhering to FFP? Nothing going on under the table?But nobody ever gave us credit anyway. As if Liverpool fans were fine honourable gentlemen after a loss to us. It was always Fergie Association, refs in our pockets, etc. Honestly this is such a bizarre thing to get concerned about. If we beat Liverpool under Qatari ownership I couldn’t give two tiny fecks what the dippers or anyone else says. As if this club hasn’t suffered enough under the Glazers. So we just want to take a moral high ground to be able to say we won with a boot on our neck? No thanks. We will adhere to every FFP rule and rival fans can cry about it all they want.
If this goes through, I don't think that people can throw the "you're an oil club with no soul" line at us still. We were already a huge club, one that has been handicapped for over a decade by leeches. If anything this redresses the balance somewhat but I don't think we'll be cooking the books city style because we shouldn't have to. So it's essentially just an ownership like most others unless an extra shedload of cash is regularly injected.
There's nothing conflicting there, unfortunately. They are negotiating exclusivity, they don't have it yet so both are correct. We are living in a prayer that Ratcliffe comes in with a new 11th hour bid to stop it from happening basically.
I’m guessing they entered into these discussions a few days ago and that’s what triggered the premature celebratory Congratulations from their sources.Deals already done IMO
To be honest this isn't their territory. Watching Ben Jacobs talk about the time a registration of a company takes just shows that he never had to deal with that in his life. Why they still bother to post their nonsense on Twitter is a different story. Getting enough traffic there must be lucrative.
I am waiting for indykaila.I'm waiting for Chilevision.
This. You saw how the Sun treated Liverpool fans, to the point where many places in Liverpool wont even stock it. But if they were struggling with current ownership and Murdoch suddenly made himself liquid and promised to sugar-daddy them (or have the Murdoch family fund them ongoing to CL glory), there'd be a substantial majority of fans that would be on board, whatever they say now...But nobody ever gave us credit anyway. As if Liverpool fans were fine honourable gentlemen after a loss to us. It was always Fergie Association, refs in our pockets, etc. Honestly this is such a bizarre thing to get concerned about. If we beat Liverpool under Qatari ownership I couldn’t give two tiny fecks what the dippers or anyone else says. As if this club hasn’t suffered enough under the Glazers. So we just want to take a moral high ground to be able to say we won with a boot on our neck? No thanks. We will adhere to every FFP rule and rival fans can cry about it all they want.
What's this? Is this not the same that was being discussed several pages back?This is happening
Very goodsounds like the kind of exclusivity my ex-girlfriend wanted with me.
This is as good as it gets, what's higher? Financial Times? Economist? WSJ? Bloomberg?
Does that include Reuters as well?At this point anything the British press say is guesswork. The likes of Ornstein and Hirst included.
And what is your opinion on City? We'll deserved success? Adhering to FFP? Nothing going on under the table?
A mate just sent me this.
You'd have to ask him if he's suggesting that.Okay, so Crafton is suggesting that the Glazers are the ones spreading false stories in the news? Anyone actually believe that the sport press isn't the one talking nonsense on their own and that it is in fact the Glazers, even though the press said everything and its opposite for all sides?
Formatting at the bottom seems inconsistentA mate just sent me this.
The guy on the far left before he was introduced to Emi Martinez.
Is this the famous teletext i've been hearing about?The 'eck is that?