- Joined
- Dec 31, 2007
- Messages
- 91,068
I don’t really care who owns us as long as they invest properly in the club. Were people here big Martin “Peeper” Edwards fanboys for example?
James W. Gibson fan here but that’s class.
I don’t really care who owns us as long as they invest properly in the club. Were people here big Martin “Peeper” Edwards fanboys for example?
It's no wonder why so many people are still very sceptical of Jassim. It's blantantly obvious he's just a front man and nothing more.
Very difficult to build trust when the whole thing is one giant pack of lies essentially.
They can't come out and say it though can they? They can't say 'Yes it's a state bid really'.
McManus and Magnier ftwJames W. Gibson fan here but that’s class.
Get your head out of the sand and stop being salty. It's over.PR = something you don't want to happen or don't agree with
Everyone is reporting INEOS are the clear favourites.
I still care who owns the club but I also want this entire shitshow to be over and done with. By the time this is finalised we'll be well into the next season, and we're going to have a long summer of uncertainty.I don’t really care who owns us as long as they invest properly in the club. Were people here big Martin “Peeper” Edwards fanboys for example?
Either way it’s leaning towards the Glazers want Qatar to takeover and are testing the waters for more money.
Because they want to keep their sources probably.British press report British billionare is the best thing since sliced bread, wonder why?
They aren’t reporting that though are they?British press report British billionare is the best thing since sliced bread, wonder why?
Why not? We'd be like the 10th club to be state-owned at this point. It's not like there are rules against it.
The article is somewhat interesting in the way it is structured, it tells more about the dynamic between each parties than anything else. From what I understand:
- Sheikh Jassim isn't directly involved in the talks with the Glazers or Raine, he lets his negotiation team handle these.
- Sheikh Jassim asked Al Khelaifi's opinion on the Glazer's evaluation of the club which is 8b$.(We don't know what Al Khelaifi opinion was)
- Al Khelaifi was then contacted by the Glazers in an attempt to convince him to talk to Sheikh Jassim.
- Al Khelaifi met the Glazers in Florida this week.
Who is Al Khelaifi working for, the Glazers or Sheikh Jassim? If we believe Ornstein, the Glazer learned that Al Khelaifi had Sheikh Jassim ears and they are trying to use it to get more money, seemingly without success.
They made an improved offer?The article is somewhat interesting in the way it is structured, it tells more about the dynamic between each parties than anything else. From what I understand:
- Sheikh Jassim isn't directly involved in the talks with the Glazers or Raine, he lets his negotiation team handle these.
- Sheikh Jassim asked Al Khelaifi's opinion on the Glazer's evaluation of the club which is 8b$.(We don't know what Al Khelaifi opinion was)
- Al Khelaifi was then contacted by the Glazers in an attempt to convince him to talk to Sheikh Jassim.
- Al Khelaifi met the Glazers in Florida this week.
Who is Al Khelaifi working for, the Glazers or Sheikh Jassim? If we believe Ornstein, the Glazer learned that Al Khelaifi had Sheikh Jassim ears and they are trying to use it to get more money, seemingly without success.
Nah, you only believe him because it's what you want to hear. Some of the twisting and turning of logic defies gravity on here.So some of you want to call Ornstein a clickbait merchant now
British press report British billionare is the best thing since sliced bread, wonder why?
They made an improved offer?
No one said that it had.But that offer still doesn't match what the Glazers want. Unless I'm missing something and a 8b$ bid was made.
based on your post, it sounds like he is almost a "mediator" type. probably has the ear of SJ, but wasn't retained by the Glazers like Raine.
Mental. Crazed fans of billionaires willing to look past simple logic.So some of you want to call Ornstein a clickbait merchant now
But that offer still doesn't match what the Glazers want. Unless I'm missing something and a 8b$ bid was made.
It's just about the football as much as you are just a football fan and nothing else. You have no family, no loved ones, no principles, no beliefs. Just about the football.It’s just about the football mate and what’s best for United and Jim certainly isn’t that
It's obvious that this whole thing is just about bragging rights for you and many others.Just take the L gracefully. I was fully prepared to if Ratcliffe came out on top.
I won't be bragging to anybody.It's obvious that this whole thing is just about bragging rights for you and many others.
Hope you never get to truly understand why so many are opposed to Qatari ownership.
Who really knows at this point?
And that somehow makes it ok? Are you "hearing" what you are saying?They’re all state backed City, Newcastle and possibly us let’s not pretend we’re doing something the other clubs aren’t
Newcastles owners openly murdered a journalist within the last 2 years but because it’s Newcastle and not United or Liverpool there wasn’t much of a stink
Yep, and what happened with the dirty laundry?Doesn’t work that way at all. Highlights and brings issues into the media, the complete opposite of a cover up. Much like hosting the World Cup, the dirty laundry was aired.
Get your head out of the sand and stop being salty. It's over.
I'm talking about the article. The article states that the Glazers asked for 8bn$ which is why Sheikh Jassim asked for Al Khelaifi's opinion.
The problem is , why are you expecting others to understand that ? You have an opinion - fair enough but keep it with you.It's obvious that this whole thing is just about bragging rights for you and many others.
Hope you never get to truly understand why so many are opposed to Qatari ownership.
It's just about the football as much as you are just a football fan and nothing else. You have no family, no loved ones, no principles, no beliefs. Just about the football.
What? Isn't that the purpose of a forum?The problem is , why are you expecting others to understand that ? You have an opinion - fair enough but keep it with you.
You have 100 reasons to oppose someone and I have another 100 to support one .
Wait .... someone shat their pants? I missed that, when did this happen?Yep, and what happened with the dirty laundry?
That guy only shows up once a year, imagine getting deals done during the summer - no thanks.The Glazers couldn't care less if its Qatar, Ineos, or Father Christmas that buys the club - they want the largest amount of money possible - currently, that's being offered by Ineos.
You do know the article states all of this was one month ago right? Since then it's the same sources that stated Khalifi refused to up the bid and they've gone into final negotiations with Ratcliff.Because this bid from Jim has been on the table for months and it's not advancing. The talk from the papers has been that Qatar can't even get Raine group to speak with them and they're being essentially ignored
We know that isn't true now and the Glazers going to Qatar asking for more money means they want a full sale. If Jim's bid was going to win it would be done or at least approaching the latter stages by now.
It was this click bait which triggered it, it's behind a paywall so doubt many people actually read it.
That guy only shows up once a year, imagine getting deals done during the summer - no thanks.