Sure. There will be a downside cost on the options though, so the options will have a guaranteed price on them to mitigate risk.Hoping, banking, speculating. It's not guaranteed.
Sure. There will be a downside cost on the options though, so the options will have a guaranteed price on them to mitigate risk.Hoping, banking, speculating. It's not guaranteed.
It is by far the biggest one though. If a new owners clears our debt and invests in stadium development, then we essentially don't really need them to be investing much more in transfers etc. We are more than capable of generating enough revenue to compete with anyone without the debt burdening us.It's possible to wipe all the debt and still be shit owners.
Of course everyone would prefer that the debt is gone. But it's not the only consideration.
I'm not even sure what a human being can do with that kind of money. It would also guarantee the financial security of many generations of your siblings and their offspring.
they're hoping we miraculously make shed load more money. Thing is, how much could they rake in as minority investors? It's all rather complicated.
No guarantees. Shares could go up or down. The price both parties are paying is already way above the market cap. Check last night's share price on the US stock market.They would be banking on their shares going up in value then selling them.
No, but the put and call options would have strike prices that essentially guarantee them a certain price.No guarantees. Shares could go up or down. The price both parties are paying is already way above the market cap. Check last night's share price on the US stock market.
No guarantees. Shares could go up or down. The price both parties are paying is already way above the market cap. Check last night's share price on the US stock market.
Yeh, I don't think we have a clue at the moment. If the Glazers were so keen to stay on as minority shareholders they'd have already accepted SJRs bid in my opinion.
Surely they could make more money sticking the damn the lot in a bank?No, but the put and call options would have strike prices that essentially guarantee them a certain price.
I don’t know. You’d have to ask them. They’re the ones that want to stay on, I’m just trying to rationalise it.Surely they could make more money sticking the damn the lot in a bank?
Correct, especially when the other bidder is going to take on more loans to buy the club. INEOS already has £6bn debt on it's books. We're kidding ourselves if we believe they'll add several billions more to their debt and expect United not to service it.It is by far the biggest one though. If a new owners clears our debt and invests in stadium development, then we essentially don't really need them to be investing much more in transfers etc. We are more than capable of generating enough revenue to compete with anyone without the debt burdening us.
Removing the politics of it to one side, surely wiping the debt is the biggest consideration for the fans.
If the ESL is dead and buried, how will they make that money? How bigger can TV deals get in it current format? Are they hoping more people get involved wanting to show the PL, which will be great for them, but rubbish for the fans yet again. They will be having to bank on the new owner turning us into a title winner again. That is far from a certainty.they're hoping we miraculously make shed load more money. Thing is, how much could they rake in as minority investors? It's all rather complicated.
As the others have said the rich always want even more.They're just greedy. They’re planning to stay around with the hope of making a tad more.
Does Jassim offer include the debt repayment though?These numbers are all speculation on the numbers from the journos who could be clueless bunch
but this is what they say
Jassim 5.2B GBP EV. Glazers get 3.6B now for their 69.5%. But they will benefit also from selling their 4.3% class A shares (for 220m) because Jassim want to buy 100% of the club.
Ratcliffe 5.5B GBP EV. Glazers get 2.75B now for 50.1% of their shares and 1B for the remaining 19% in 3 years.
Hoping, banking, speculating. It's not guaranteed.
Also none of them are getting any younger. If it were me I'd want the money asap so I could enjoy it for as long as possible. Solid gold house and so onI'm not even sure what a human being can do with that kind of money. It would also guarantee the financial security of many generations of your siblings and their offspring.
Even in this instance?As the others have said the rich always want even more.
Correct, especially when the other bidder is going to take on more loans to buy the club. INEOS already has £6bn debt on it's books. We're kidding ourselves if we believe they'll add several billions more to their debt and expect United not to service it.
Absolutely this, feck that.Glazers to stay having had good meetings to increase the credit facilities due to bids. Man City to win the treble. Magic, dining at Tier 2 Table for another 10 years. Look forward to watching Ten Hag be thrown under the bus due to none CL qualification. Anything other than this will be a moral victory.
Surely they could make more money sticking the damn the lot in a bank?
Of course they know what they're doing. How's that contradictory to expect debt being serviced by United? This isn't going to be an altruistic investment, as much as you'd like it to be.You're kidding yourself by pretending to know how it works and just cluelessly throwing fits.
INEOS have 6bn debt as you say, so I'd argue they know what the feck they are doing over some geezer sat on his phone at home.
Which is why our transfers end up a bloody mess. The longer this goes on our transfer window could be in ruins. You or me would take the money and run, if it is Avram and Joel who are driving this then it is not surprising they are dithering. You wonder how the other four think or do the other two just ride roughshod over their siblings?Even in this instance?
Surely if someone decides to sell they sell up? They then have more capitol to invest etc which would result in a higher ROI instead of being scared to let go.
Obviously I don’t know what I’m talking about but indecisiveness isn’t a positive trait
I'm fairly neutral and just want the Glazers gone (and a few other things that I'd get banned if I said)The deal with SJR is so complicated. Would be very risky for the Glazers. A few downsides for SJR, too. Sheikh Jassim's bid is a lot cleaner. Makes more sense.
I just don't see how the Glazers won't accept Sheikh Jassim's.
Of course they know what they're doing. How's that contradictory to expect debt being serviced by United? This isn't going to be an altruistic investment, as much as you'd like it to be.
The only thing the Glazers care about is who is offering more money for each of their shares. Jassim's bid doesn't do that.The deal with SJR is so complicated. Would be very risky for the Glazers. A few downsides for SJR, too. Sheikh Jassim's bid is a lot cleaner. Makes more sense.
I just don't see how the Glazers won't accept Sheikh Jassim's.
The only thing the Glazers care about is who is offering more money for each of their shares. Jassim's bid doesn't do that.
The timing of the Glazer sale is extremely telling.
1) The collapse of ESL means there will be no foreseeable jump in revenue for the near future
2) Rising interest rates means costs are going dramatically up
3) Liverpool announcing their sale could suck up the last bits of appetite for takeovers, especially after seeing the Chelsea and Newcastle takeovers.
Glazers saw the writing on the wall, got desperate and decided to sell. They're now just using the ENEOS bid to yank the Qatari's chain to try and squeeze whatever ounce of money they can out of this deal.
Worst scenario is that the Glazer’s pull out of both bids.I just hope that the news that Qatar might pull out on Friday is true...not because I don`t want Qatar. I don`t really favour Qatar or SJR they both have +/- but we might actually finally be a step closer to this being sorted out.
If they pull out it`s SJR surely!
Very simple conclusion which is wrong.The only thing the Glazers care about is who is offering more money for each of their shares. Jassim's bid doesn't do that.
Big day tomorrow.
Or next Friday? Was a Friday specified?Big day tomorrow.
Only by SJ Qatar bidOr next Friday? Was a Friday specified?