Absolutely no reading comprehension or ability to think critically here because state money has blurred your vision, absolutely wild some of the posts on this forum mind. Regardless of the fact you are biased towards Qatar, you obviously have read nothing beyond reactionary headlines towards the Ratcliffe/INEOS bid.
"Little weasel Jim" putting up even a single penny has not "fecked this whole process up." Qatar/SJ have virtually unlimited funds, so why do they continue to underbid Ratcliffe/INEOS, the Glazers don't give two shits about 1 billion investment pledges and so on.
The guy from Iceland was a fraud talking about giving voting rights to members who signed up to an app, which is why his bid was dismissed out of hand. Ratcliffe/INEOS have offered up two deals, one for 100% same as Qatar/SJ and one for a controlling stake in the club, leaving the Glazers with some monetary shares and no control over the club until he buys out their remaining shares at a premium a couple of years down the line. Why? Because it's been widely reported and is well known that the Glazers don't necessarily want to leave United yet because they think it will increase in value in a few years, they're only in this process because their hand has been forced.
So if the only way to get the Glazers to sell is to keep them around in some capacity, but having no say or control over the club, then i'm glad Ratcliffe offered that option. For some reason people like you seem to think the Glazers should undersell on their valuation to Qatar/SJ out of the goodness of their hearts for us fans but that's just not how them or the real world works is it.