Tom Van Persie
No relation
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
- Messages
- 27,814
Shame on you for giving them a click.Also, How the hell are you supposed to read anything on that website? The pop ups and banners/ads are ridiculous
Shame on you for giving them a click.Also, How the hell are you supposed to read anything on that website? The pop ups and banners/ads are ridiculous
Is this supposed to be bad or something? We should be signing 4-6 new players this summer.Yes particularly the report about Jassims 4th bid and his 6 new signings in the summer.
He’s going to nuke the planet from orbit
My badShame on you for giving them a click.
This sentence was written with the absolute certainty of someone who had some insight into the whole bidding process and bids on the table.Jassim's camp took it for granted they would win. Their approach was very naive.
So, it is Jim Glazer in the end after all. Can't help but feel the club is being set down the path of Everton and Leeds. My confidence and trust in Ratcliffe are precisely zero. Setting aside the state of his other two clubs, his camp consistently danced around the issue of existing debt with clever wordplay, never said in no uncertain terms how the future of the club will be funded, and to top it all of he is keeping the very people who ruined the club and are universally despised by the fans. Not exactly what I call fostering belief. I don't think we will be anywhere close to competing with City, Newcastle, and eventually the Qatari team. We will continue to struggle greatly in making the CL, even with the 5 team quota, and eventually fall further behind. That being said, it will go a long way if he immediately gets rid of certain elements within the club. Those being the Glazer plant and Darth Woodward's apprentice. The sooner the better. Keeping them on the other hand will make it clear where he stands...
It is what it is.
Yeah like I believed that Sun report from yesterday.You would be pissing your pants if it as positive Ratcliffe news
Hardly realistic with a reported £100m ffp constrained budget.Is this supposed to be bad or something? We should be signing 4-6 new players this summer.
Good, honesty. Now were getting somewhereYeah like I believed that Sun report from yesterday.
Don't be silly.Hardly realistic with a reported £100m ffp constrained budget.
Because the wealthiest and most successful clubs in recent years are either owned or strongly supported by states. Want a list?
Real Madrid... Spanish government/Spanish royal family.
Barcelona... Catalan government.
Manchester City... Abu Dhabi.
Zenit St. Petersburg... Gazprom (majority state-owned by Russia).
PSG... Qatar.
etc.
As for the Glazers, they fecked our position within FPP because of the debt. Last but not least, I have seen enough of the situation in Nice and Lausanne to be totally distrustful of a SJR ownership.
You would be pissing your pants if it as positive Ratcliffe news
MIght want to go back and look at some of the replies to that news last night then. They were planning an open-top bus parade.Most of us in favour of Ratcliffe tend to be quite relaxed an generally make light of all the reports.
The Protaris generally descend into madness over any pro Ineos news though. Whether it's the clubs inevitable doom or how they're going to stop supporting the club.
You've completely missed the pointPosting something from the Express is like posting fan fiction... Keep it for your blog
This sentence was written with the absolute certainty of someone who had some insight into the whole bidding process and bids on the table.
They’ve been in meltdown all day over last nights article in the Sun for feck sake, hardly a bastion of journalistic integrity.The Protaris generally descend into madness over any pro Ineos news though.
Meltdown over what?They’ve been in meltdown all day over last nights article in the Sun for feck sake, hardly a bastion of journalistic integrity.
The golden sheikhd bid being beaten by INEOS.Meltdown over what?
You've completely missed the point
MIght want to go back and look at some of the replies to that news last night then. They were planning an open-top bus parade.
Oh sorry I meant real things, not made-up bollocks mateThe golden sheikhd bid being beaten by INEOS.
Fighting fire with fire.What's the point? To post the biggest load of drivel you can find?
Right of courseI've seen. Was generally light hearted with a hint of sarcasm, which to be fair doesn't always come through in text.
Could be worse, could be Billy_No_Mates_48281 on Twitter.What's the point? To post the biggest load of drivel you can find?
Don't doxx yourself mateCould be worse, could be Billy_No_Mates_48281 on Twitter.
Stop posting the Sun and the Express then!Oh sorry I meant real things, not made-up bollocks mate
Could be worse, could be Billy_No_Mates_48281 on Twitter.
Right of course
I reckon big Jim is knocking back a few viagra as we speak, in anticipation of an accepted bid.
Fighting fire with fire.
See, I thought you were trying to find a source so bad they made the Sun look like a credible bastion of journalistic integrity.
No I just want Mbappe and Messi.The old "can't beat em, join em"
Same reason they support Qatar
Why does Qatar want them then?
And if they're irrelevant and have no value, why would he buy them slowly over a few years?
Who knows, it could very well be the original source of the tabloids ‘exclusive’!Would it be worse though?
Can’t believe Jim appears to have won out with the rats staying on. I guess we’ll hear something official tomorrow.