Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's hardly anybody claiming that though is it. Most claim that they are stalling or at least not visibly improving which is what you would expect after being taken over by a multi billionaire and which is why many are cautious when it come to Jim. On the other hand you might say that you can't draw conclusions from how he runs those clubs to how he will run United but these are the only hints you have. With Qatar you have PSG who also might be a bit of a circus but compared to how they were run before Qatar took over it's night and day.

But anyway let's see what comes out of that. I just hope this long period of noting happening at all doesn't mean these fecks aren't sure whether to sell at all. Wasting that much of the bidders would be quite something.
Think if the Glazer don't sell, then if they had any modicum of a good reputation in the business world, it will be shot to pieces.
 
For all those people talking about selling the soul of the club: until 50+1 fan ownership kicks in, it doesn't matter which billionaire owns us, none of them are what I'd class as ideal owners because they all believe having money in their own pockets is worth more than ethics and morals. If you think Jim has more ethics and morals than the guy leading the Qatari foundation, I'd like to see the details backing that up. I don't see anything showing Jim wouldn't do exactly the same thing as Qatari leaders do if he were able to do it and make money from it. It's not like the Qatari guy has a history of wrongdoings as far as I'm aware. Seems he's been mostly under the radar for the bulk of his life.

Given I think the billionaires are all bad people, I weigh up the options like this:

- Glazers out vs Glazers in
- Debt cleared vs Debt remaining
- Poor history of club ownership vs No history of club ownership
- Lower financial investment vs Higher financial investment

Seems like a no-brainer to me. Jim might be from Manchester but so is Liam Gallagher and if Liam were a billionaire I'd prefer some unknown foreign dude too.
 
Lausanne

Before Ineos:

2010/11: 1st (2nd div, promoted )
2011/12: 7th (1st div)
2012/13: 9th (1st div)
2013/14: 10th (1st div, relegated)
2014/15: 6th (2nd div)
2015/16: 1st (2nd div, promoted)
2016/17: 9th (1st div)

After Ineos:

17/18: 10th (1st div, relegated)
18/19: 3rd (2nd div)
19/20: 1st (2nd div, promoted)
20/21: 6th (1st div)
21/22: 10th (1st div, relegated)
22/23: currently 3rd in 2nd div

OGC Nice

Before Ineos:

2010/11: 17th
2011/12: 13th
2012/13: 4th
2013/14: 17th
2014/15: 11th
2015/16: 4th
2016/17: 8th
2017/18: 5th
2018/19: 7th

After Ineos:

2019/20: 5th
2020/21: 9th
2021/22: 5th
2022/23: currently 8th

Let's put this BS argument to rest, once and for all.

Tbh that looks like in the 4 seasons before Ineos they averaged 6th and in the 4 seasons since they averaged 7th, and for the lausanne, 6 seasons before ineos 4 were spent in the 1st division, 6 seasons since 3 were spent in the 1st division, which does seem to indicate the teams were the same or better before ineos rather than put the argument to bed
 
Lausanne

Before Ineos:

2010/11: 1st (2nd div, promoted )
2011/12: 7th (1st div)
2012/13: 9th (1st div)
2013/14: 10th (1st div, relegated)
2014/15: 6th (2nd div)
2015/16: 1st (2nd div, promoted)
2016/17: 9th (1st div)

After Ineos:

17/18: 10th (1st div, relegated)
18/19: 3rd (2nd div)
19/20: 1st (2nd div, promoted)
20/21: 6th (1st div)
21/22: 10th (1st div, relegated)
22/23: currently 3rd in 2nd div

OGC Nice

Before Ineos:

2010/11: 17th
2011/12: 13th
2012/13: 4th
2013/14: 17th
2014/15: 11th
2015/16: 4th
2016/17: 8th
2017/18: 5th
2018/19: 7th

After Ineos:

2019/20: 5th
2020/21: 9th
2021/22: 5th
2022/23: currently 8th

Let's put this BS argument to rest, once and for all.
You have. Just not in the way you intended.
 
Yes, we can put the "they were better off and Ineos has ruined them" bullshit argument.
Ruined? No. But done a poor job? Looking at their results, yes, I would say they've done a poor job. If you haven't improved a club after buying them (and I imagine they would have claimed to intend on improving them), it's poor.

Unless you'd be happy with us staying as we have been these past ten or so years?
 
So, could Qatar basically say: "Hey, we upper or offer with 5%" or was the final round of bids really "the final bids"? Looks like Jim got it but I guess everything that counts for the Glazers is as much money as possible? Maybe Quatar could put in a last minute offer to the Raine Group or is that not possible?
 
Yes, we can put the "they were better off and Ineos has ruined them" bullshit argument.

I didn't use the term ruined them. I said that INEOS aren't very good in football. If a company of that size can't keep a Swiss team from getting regularly relegated then....
 
There's hardly anybody claiming that though is it.

I've seen that argument way too many times both on here and Twitter (the latter, mostly). I'm not saying Nice and Lausanne have done better, but people are exaggerating saying that Ineos ruined them.

Running Manchester United is also a completely different animal to Nice and a Swiss club.
 
Yes, we can put the "they were better off and Ineos has ruined them" bullshit argument.

What was said is that INEOS hasn't improved them and using your own stats that absolutely seems to be correct
 
So, could Qatar basically say: "Hey, we upper or offer with 5%" or was the final round of bids really "the final bids"? Looks like Jim got it but I guess everything that counts for the Glazers is as much money as possible? Maybe Quatar could put in a last minute offer to the Raine Group or is that not possible?
There's nothing stopping late bids.
 
I've seen that argument way too many times both on here and Twitter (the latter, mostly). I'm not saying Nice and Lausanne have done better, but people are exaggerating saying that Ineos ruined them.

Running Manchester United is also a completely different animal to Nice and a Swiss club.

Yeah that's my hope when it comes to Jim. And the fact he seemingly was or is a United fan which might make it more interesting for him to really invest properly. But looking at these two clubs leaves a bad taste in my mouth when it comes to him. Not that a Qatari takeover wouldn't...for obvious reasons.
 
For all those people talking about selling the soul of the club: until 50+1 fan ownership kicks in, it doesn't matter which billionaire owns us, none of them are what I'd class as ideal owners because they all believe having money in their own pockets is worth more than ethics and morals. If you think Jim has more ethics and morals than the guy leading the Qatari foundation, I'd like to see the details backing that up. I don't see anything showing Jim wouldn't do exactly the same thing as Qatari leaders do if he were able to do it and make money from it. It's not like the Qatari guy has a history of wrongdoings as far as I'm aware. Seems he's been mostly under the radar for the bulk of his life.

Given I think the billionaires are all bad people, I weigh up the options like this:

- Glazers out vs Glazers in
- Debt cleared vs Debt remaining
- Poor history of club ownership vs No history of club ownership
- Lower financial investment vs Higher financial investment

Seems like a no-brainer to me. Jim might be from Manchester but so is Liam Gallagher and if Liam were a billionaire I'd prefer some unknown foreign dude too.

Right but that's not how the Glazers are looking at it is it.

Glazers POV
More money for us vs Less money for us

If Jassim loses out to SJR he only has himself to blame for not offering the amount of money from his deep pockets to turn the heads of the Glazers. That isn't Ratcliffe's fault.

I'm not sure what people aren't understanding in this thread, if Ratcliffe wins it's because Jassim's offer just wasn't enough, but people are expecting the Glazers should take Jassim's offer even if it's lower than Ratcliffe's, just because it might be better for the club. They don't care.
 
Lausanne

Before Ineos:

2010/11: 1st (2nd div, promoted )
2011/12: 7th (1st div)
2012/13: 9th (1st div)
2013/14: 10th (1st div, relegated)
2014/15: 6th (2nd div)
2015/16: 1st (2nd div, promoted)
2016/17: 9th (1st div)

After Ineos:

17/18: 10th (1st div, relegated)
18/19: 3rd (2nd div)
19/20: 1st (2nd div, promoted)
20/21: 6th (1st div)
21/22: 10th (1st div, relegated)
22/23: currently 3rd in 2nd div

OGC Nice

Before Ineos:

2010/11: 17th
2011/12: 13th
2012/13: 4th
2013/14: 17th
2014/15: 11th
2015/16: 4th
2016/17: 8th
2017/18: 5th
2018/19: 7th

After Ineos:

2019/20: 5th
2020/21: 9th
2021/22: 5th
2022/23: currently 8th

Let's put this BS argument to rest, once and for all.

JFC, that's Mike Ashley kind of bad even for those leagues.

You realise SJR was born in Manchester and has also supported the club since he was a boy, I don't really see your point here. That Jassim fell in love with the club when he was younger so he clearly would have the clubs best intentions at heart over someone who also fell in love with the club when he was younger?

I don't give a flying feck if he's born in Manchester, in Portsmouth or in Blackpool. The thing that matters is that his sporting ventures have been nothing short of shit. Intentions mean shit unless results are there, and Ratcliffe is nowhere near showing he is good at this business.
 
So, could Qatar basically say: "Hey, we upper or offer with 5%" or was the final round of bids really "the final bids"? Looks like Jim got it but I guess everything that counts for the Glazers is as much money as possible? Maybe Quatar could put in a last minute offer to the Raine Group or is that not possible?

This is the Glazers. At any time, if any party offer them a few more quid they'll put them at the top of the queue.
 
Who is to say Qatar won't come in and run us like PSG for 10 years? That would be a fecking nightmare.

Imagine sacking ten Hag after finishing second in the PL on 95 points and losing the CL final.

Imagine sacking a manager because someone like Mbappé is given too much player power and doesn't fancy the manager anymore.

Imagine having a really solid team, but then forcing some unnecessary signing onto a manager because it's a big name, like Donnarumma replacing Navas, or signing a 34-year old Ramos and a 35-year old Messi, simply because they are huge names.

These are the sorts of things I expect Qatar would be doing.
 
To base a preference of decades of ownership on whether the current owners hang as minority shareholders for an extra couple years or not is just daft though.

Who is to say Qatar won't come in and run us like PSG for 10 years? That would be a fecking nightmare.

To say nice are run on Woodward level bad is probably an exaggeration.

Nope, they'd be taking the debt off the books of the club and placing them on to the holding company. And likely restructured on better terms.
Please point to where you have seen this?
The only thing I have seen confirmed is that Ineos bid will not be leveraged on the club but on Ineos. There is no suggestion he is clearing the club's debt or even renegotiating it.
https://amp.theguardian.com/football/2023/feb/16/sir-jim-ratcliffe-manchester-united-bid-ineos
 
Last edited:
JFC, that's Mike Ashley kind of bad even for those leagues.



I don't give a flying feck if he's born in Manchester, in Portsmouth or in Blackpool. The thing that matters is that his sporting ventures have been nothing short of shit. Intentions mean shit unless results are there, and Ratcliffe is nowhere near showing he is good at this business.
That's not what I said... the argument was Jassim would be better because he fell in love with United as a kid, my point was so did SJR so that's a stupid argument to make. I didn't say anything else about money or how he is as a businessman, which Jassim may have over him.
 
Maybe, maybe not.
The only information we have is that The Sun newspaper is more useful to light your fire with, than it is as a source of credible news.
Probably say that about every mainstream newspaper in the country to be honest.
 
I've seen that argument way too many times both on here and Twitter (the latter, mostly). I'm not saying Nice and Lausanne have done better, but people are exaggerating saying that Ineos ruined them.

Running Manchester United is also a completely different animal to Nice and a Swiss club.

It's a mental argument.

It'd be like trying to extrapolate how well a millionaire is going to look after his brand new Ferrari based on the care and attention he's given to his '16 Ford Fiesta parked up outside the driveway. It's juvenile analysis at best.

And to continue on with the analogy, it's even more mental to twerk for Jassim to take patronage of the Ferrari when we know he's never owned any car before and we don't even know if he can drive.
 
All this does is suggest that both teams are yo yo clubs one flitting between division 2 and division 1, the other flitting between top 5 and mid table. That suggests to me Glazers 2.0 who have owned Britains biggest club and turned it into a yo yo club between Europa League and CL in the last decade.

It suggests someone who is not hands on but hands off and employs the wrong people to get the wrong results short term and long term, this will raise Concerns amongst fans and should he win the bid, keeping the 2 Glazers brothers, anything other than Prem league challenge like Arsenal have done this year will leave SJR facing a huge uphill battle to become popular. You can see why so many fans are concerned with him as a viable option ?
What a way to move the goal posts.

I think midtable to relegation is considerably worse than EL/UCL despite considerable drop in success in the last decade if memory serves me rightly we only missed out on Europe once and that was 7th under Moyes. Apart from that we’ve been a consistent team in Europe. However you want to spin it, that’s MUCH better than taking a midtable team to relegation. Even being champions to relegation!

SJR will be an absolute disaster
 
It's a mental argument.

It'd be like trying to extrapolate how well a millionaire is going to look after his brand new Ferrari based on the care and attention he's given to his '16 Ford Fiesta parked up outside the driveway. It's juvenile analysis at best.

And to continue on with the analogy, it's even more mental to twerk for Jassim to take patronage of the Ferrari when we know he's never owned any car before and we don't even know if he can drive.
No millionaire would own and drive a Fiesta. Hell, the kids of said millionaire wouldn’t even drive a Fiesta. They’d all want Audis, Beeners and Evoques. Spoilt brats the lot of them!
 
It's a mental argument.

It'd be like trying to extrapolate how well a millionaire is going to look after his brand new Ferrari based on the care and attention he's given to his '16 Ford Fiesta parked up outside the driveway. It's juvenile analysis at best.

And to continue on with the analogy, it's even more mental to twerk for Jassim to take patronage of the Ferrari when we know he's never owned any car before and we don't even know if he can drive.
I can only laugh at this post.
 
It's a mental argument.

It'd be like trying to extrapolate how well a millionaire is going to look after his brand new Ferrari based on the care and attention he's given to his '16 Ford Fiesta parked up outside the driveway. It's juvenile analysis at best.

And to continue on with the analogy, it's even more mental to twerk for Jassim to take patronage of the Ferrari when we know he's never owned any car before and we don't even know if he can drive.

Just as a note, the 4 seasons before Qatar bought psg they finished 16th, 6th, 13th and 4th. Worse than Nice's finishes, so they were kinda the equivalent of a fiesta and they were turned into a Ferrari pretty quickly
 
It's a mental argument.

It'd be like trying to extrapolate how well a millionaire is going to look after his brand new Ferrari based on the care and attention he's given to his '16 Ford Fiesta parked up outside the driveway. It's juvenile analysis at best.

And to continue on with the analogy, it's even more mental to twerk for Jassim to take patronage of the Ferrari when we know he's never owned any car before and we don't even know if he can drive.

Lets say you own Microsoft and are about to hire a new managing director. You get suggested a dude who has previously been managing two 7eleven stores. He hasnt really managed them well.
Are you going to trust him to manage Microsoft?
 
Imagine sacking ten Hag after finishing second in the PL on 95 points and losing the CL final.

Imagine sacking a manager because someone like Mbappé is given too much player power and doesn't fancy the manager anymore.

Imagine having a really solid team, but then forcing some unnecessary signing onto a manager because it's a big name, like Donnarumma replacing Navas, or signing a 34-year old Ramos and a 35-year old Messi, simply because they are huge names.

These are the sorts of things I expect Qatar would be doing.
Also there is no chance our lads would be doing anything dodgy like these lads https://www.redcafe.net/threads/citys-sponsors-do-not-exist.473135/page-7#post-30530405
 
[/QUOTE]
There's one factor for me that often gets forgotten about when talking about money and who's going to do what when they come in and that's passion. It's about a love for United.

The difference between SJR and Jassim is that Jassim has openly stated he fell in love with the club when he was younger and living in the UK. For me, this makes all the difference. I never get that impression with SJR.
Yes he can talk a good talk,...Utd are the biggest club in the world....should be back up there...blah blah blah, but I always get the sense he's talking very much from a 'business' point of view.

I believe Jassim would run the club with passion and SJR would very much run it like a business first. Some people will say that's how it should be run and to a certain extent, that's true. But it's also very easy to forget that when push comes to shove it's about what happens on the pitch and its here where I think a manager like ETH would go 'we desperately need a striker' and the reaction from Jassim and SJR would be completely different. Jassims passion would be 'well who do you need, get what you want to be the best' and SJRs reaction would be '..well we've already spent £150m, so let's wait till the next transfer window'.

That for me is the biggest difference between the two of them. For one it will be a passion because he loves the club for the other, just another business deal.

And as a side note I've followed pro cycling for years and since Ineos took over Team Sky they've done bugger all in terms of major wins. He also moved Sir David Brailsford from Team Sky over to run Nice FC and that hasn't worked out. Running a business is one thing, running a sporting team is something else. It requires a different mindset.

I still don’t know what is best for the club. Don’t want state ownership, don’t know if Jim will invest enough in infrastructure.

But how has Jim less love or passion for the club than Jassim has? Jim grew up in the Manchester area and supported the club his whole life. Oke his remarks about the Chelsea season ticket are weird.

But Jassim started supporting the club when they had succes and decided to support them. No problem there ofcourse, but how does that make him more passionate or more in love with the club than Jim?

We have al sorts of strange arguments now, just because no one knows anything.
 
It's hard to keep up here, so can someone summarize for me, who is winning the take over bid?
 
Just as a note, the 4 seasons before Qatar bought psg they finished 16th, 6th, 13th and 4th. Worse than Nice's finishes, so they were kinda the equivalent of a fiesta and they were turned into a Ferrari pretty quickly
Irrelevant note as there wasn't any history of Qatar owning another club prior to their takeover of PSG.

Ratcliff owns Nice and we know they are terrible. Suddenly expecting the same owner to be a great onwer just because we are United is laughable to say the least.
 
Lets say you own Microsoft and are about to hire a new managing director. You get suggested a dude who has previously been managing two 7eleven stores. He hasnt really managed them well.
Are you going to trust him to manage Microsoft?
By their logic, yes because the dude's skillset would magically upgrade when he takes over at Microsoft.
 
Irrelevant note as there wasn't any history of Qatar owning another club prior to their takeover of PSG.

Ratcliff owns Nice and we know they are terrible. Suddenly expecting the same owner to be a great onwer just because we are United is laughable to say the least.

You're missing my point, to say that Ratcliffe shouldn't be judged on what he's done buying a midtable club is bizarre, when the other bidders also took over a midtable club in the same league and turned them into the best side in the league within about 2 seasons, and champions league finalists in under a decade.

Meanwhile Ratcliffe took over a team in a better position than 2011 psg and so far hasn't improve then at all
 
Ratcliffe is just an English Glazers. That’s why they get on so well.

He’ll be the same, if not worse than, the Glazers.

Another crap, hands off, out of touch, nepotism over excellence owner. It’s all right there.

He took over Nice, Qatar took over PSG… where was each club before? Where are they now?

It’s blatantly obvious and some of you are deluding yourselves.
 
He took over Nice, Qatar took over PSG… where was each club before? Where are they now?

It’s blatantly obvious and some of you are deluding yourselves.

you arent reading the room. Many Utd supporters dont want to be like PSG at all.

PSG fans dont seem overly harmonious at the moment anyway
 
You're missing my point, to say that Ratcliffe shouldn't be judged on what he's done buying a midtable club is bizarre, when the other bidders also took over a midtable club in the same league and turned them into the best side in the league within about 2 seasons, and champions league finalists in under a decade.

Meanwhile Ratcliffe took over a team in a better position than 2011 psg and so far hasn't improve then at all
Gotcha. My bad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.