andersj
Nick Powell Expert
It is this type of stupidity that worries me could be the case with someone we not very little about.
It is this type of stupidity that worries me could be the case with someone we not very little about.
That’s the thing here - we’re not talking about ceremonial ambassadorial duties but actual day to day functioning of the football club. It’s got disaster written all over it.I could actually get on board with bringing Beckham into the fold in the sort of prestigious tapping up role that Zidane has held at Madrid.
Cantona too but he wouldn’t be seen dead working with the Qataris.
Let’s be honest though, a lot of our club legends we shouldn’t have anywhere near roles that carry authority.
Ogden tweet
It’s fecking ridiculous.The Twitter kids with a Qatar flag in their bio are already dismissing this as "Ratcliffe PR".
Love how they just conveniently refuse to believe anything that doesn't suit their agenda. Qatar and Jassim are perfect in everything and they won't hear otherwise!
You spelled HarryP wrong.Has nobody realised yet that the Glazers are not going anywhere?
This is, and always has been, a load of hot air.
*this is just my opinion
That’s the thing here - we’re not talking about ceremonial ambassadorial duties but actual day to day functioning of the football club. It’s got disaster written all over it.
It’s fecking ridiculous.
Imagine if this was Ratcliffe's intention according to the article. The reception to those news would be completely different.
Rio the only other one I can think of. The guy's been gagging for a role at United.Says it'll be legends from the two most recent CL winning teams (99 and 08)
Other than van der Sar, and Fletcher who we already have, I can't think of any who'd be in line for "senior executive roles" here - Neville or Butt?
Beckham (or Ronaldo in time) as the lead ambassador would make sense, but that's not an executive role.
Yeah, it would be personal and bitterly vitriolic. Social media is the worst.Imagine if this was Ratcliffe's intention according to the article. The reception to those news would be completely different.
Thats a pretty fecking disgusting post
Indeed. It would be 100% reversed from both sides. The Qatari fans would call it idiotic and mates fc and you lot would call it brilliant and proof that Jim is such a true fan.
Nope, it’s a stupid plan whoever proposes it.Indeed. It would be 100% reversed from both sides. The Qatari fans would call it idiotic and mates fc and you lot would call it brilliant and proof that Jim is such a true fan.
Indeed. It would be 100% reversed from both sides. The Qatari fans would call it idiotic and mates fc and you lot would call it brilliant and proof that Jim is such a true fan.
I mean...not really? It would be a pretty disgusting act to do it - it's not disgusting to draw attention to the fact that Qatar is a country with archaic domestic violence and guardianship laws where people like Giggs and Greenwood (allegedly) would be far more accepted in society. These are just facts that people need to deal with.
I mean...not really? It would be a pretty disgusting act to do it - it's not disgusting to draw attention to the fact that Qatar is a country with archaic domestic violence and guardianship laws where people like Giggs and Greenwood (allegedly) would be far more accepted in society. These are just facts that people need to deal with.
The tweet talks about the Sheik. That post implies that he himself is a okay with rapists and abusers.
The tweet talks about the Sheik. That post implies that he himself is a okay with rapists and abusers.
He comes from a society that has normalized domestic violence, marital abuse and archaic guardianship laws. He is in bed with the people who make those laws, with people who treat women as second class citizens. It is not a huge leap.
What's disgusting is not acknowledging this because you want your football team to do well.
but would anyone be surprised if he was just another asshole billionaire that abuses his power does horrible things to other people, because well, he can?
No. But you could say the exact same thing about Jim Rattcliffe?
No. But you could say the exact same thing about Jim Rattcliffe?
He comes from a society that has normalized domestic violence, marital abuse and archaic guardianship laws. He is in bed with the people who make those laws, with people who treat women as second class citizens. It is not a huge leap.
What's disgusting is not acknowledging this because you want your football team to do well.
I'm not a Ratcliffe fan, but there's a difference between being an asshole (which he probably is) whose company does unethical things and being a murderous regime.
But I was talking about the Sheik himself which the tweet was about, not the regime.
And before this goes any further I should note I personally hope we see someone other than a statebacked billionair or Ineos because neither sounds ideal to me.
Did Whitwell say that SJR is confident?
I understand, but how likely is it that Jassim or his dad are using their own money? And how likely is it that they disagree with their own family about their country's major political laws and human rights issues?
So Jim Rattcliffe is someone who kills Journalists and abuses women and murders gay people?
Given as he is in bed with the Saudis?
Ineos billionaire Jim Ratcliffe in $2bn Saudi investment - BBC News
I dont know. Its why I said its not ideal to me, because it seems somewhat unlikely its their own money. Given that he studied and lived in England for several years he might not agree with the issues? Its certainly a leap for me to imply he would downright celebrate abuse of women by getting those two cnuts as the first ones.
He comes from a society that has normalized domestic violence, marital abuse and archaic guardianship laws. He is in bed with the people who make those laws, with people who treat women as second class citizens. It is not a huge leap.
What's disgusting is not acknowledging this because you want your football team to do well.