I’m not an expert but I’m fairly certain the other 4 have the votes to change the class share rules? I think it’s 2/3 majority I read on here.I don't see what that has to do with anything I said. There cannot be a takeover without all of them agreeing to it, because Class B shares are presumably non-transferable without unanimous approval. Even if the other 4 decided to fly to Doha today and sell directly to Qatar, there won't be a change in control, because Qatar will be buying Class A shares, leaving Joel and Avram in control. Needless to say Qatar won't even consider this idea. That is what I was saying.
I don’t really see the logic there.The longer this goes, the less likely it will be Jassim imo. He has the money to just get this done so all this stalling seems to be trying to get the word out that it will be Radcliffe and Ineos.
The longer this goes, the less likely it will be Jassim imo. He has the money to just get this done so all this stalling seems to be trying to get the word out that it will be Radcliffe and Ineos.
Both are true. There is a bylaw that states no class b shares can be sold without everyone agreeing to it. There is also a 2/3 majority rule.I’m not an expert but I’m fairly certain the other 4 have the votes to change the class share rules? I think it’s 2/3 majority I read on here.
No, I'm saying that the Glazers from day one explored all options which includes a partial sale. Elliott are one of the bidders that Raine and the Glazers approved up until this point. In fact you tell me, do you think that Elliott have passed several rounds of bids while no one is okay with the terms of a potential sale, Elliott will at the last minute refuse to be minority owners?
Why would anyone invest into the club if the money will go straight into the Glazers pockets. Presuming you mean the 4 siblings shares.Ah, then we agree completely then. I've made exactly the same point in this thread - Elliot wouldn't have made it this far into the process if they weren't a viable option. In fact, I believe they were in pole position up until Ratcliffe's offer to keep Joel and Avram on. And now might be again after this recent revelation about the clause in his deal. If it's not PR, of course.
I don’t really see the logic there.
Just accept the Ineos bid already..
Defeat from the jaws of victory!
Unless Elliott are wildly incompetent in their diligence, the two Glazers will surely face the same dilemma around being asked to essentially stake any future cash-out on handing over control to someone else (and quite likely deferring dividends in the meantime)Ah, then we agree completely then. I've made exactly the same point in this thread - Elliot wouldn't have made it this far into the process if they weren't a viable option. In fact, I believe they were in pole position up until Ratcliffe's offer to keep Joel and Avram on. And now might be again after this recent revelation about the clause in his deal. If it's not PR, of course.
Ah, then we agree completely then. I've made exactly the same point in this thread - Elliot wouldn't have made it this far into the process if they weren't a viable option. In fact, I believe they were in pole position up until Ratcliffe's offer to keep Joel and Avram on. And now might be again after this recent revelation about the clause in his deal. If it's not PR, of course.
I agree, it's utterly ridiculous. Brinkmanship nowt else.
Why would anyone invest into the club if the money will go straight into the Glazers pockets. Presuming you mean the 4 siblings shares.
I don't think they're stupid.For the same reason Elliot gave 300M Euro at 11%(?) interest rate to the Chinese guy when he bought AC Milan. And then he defaulted. And yes, I do believe Joel and Avram are just greedy and stupid enough to take such a risk. And I'd wager Elliot believe the same. They exist because of such people.
Think someone said Malcolm went to war with his sisters over their mothers estate. Not a nice bunch.
I don't think they're stupid.
I'd rather be poor and a nice person than like them. Amazed he didn't charge them for the number of windows their homes had.Dig around and you'll find all kinds of dirt.
https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-1992-01-19-1992019005-story.html
https://www.tampabay.com/archive/1995/07/21/n-y-mobile-home-park-residents-sue-glazer/
I don't think they're stupid.
I just don't think the numbers make sense. They would have to sell a lot of their own share, enough that it would hardly be worth doing if at all. If it's the siblings then all they would be doing is adding more debt, the money would go to the siblings not to the club if they sell their shares presumably.Yeah? And how about greedy? If the slimes truly believe in their heads they stand to make more money down the line...
I'd rather be poor and a nice person than like them. Amazed he didn't charge them for the number of windows their homes had.
Well, they've either been incompetent in appointing their advisors or arrogant (and thus 'unintelligent'' in a certain sense) in following their counsel when it comes to strategy, both directly and in terms of executive appointments. With the advantages they had in terms of the club's position they could have increased value and made money whilst pretty much guaranteeing competitiveness; it's not a virtual monopoly league like the Bundesliga, but Liverpool have done OK with a 'for profit' model, just by appointing people capable of making strategic decisions and moving quickly to streamline processes as well as jettisoning Rodgers once it was clear they'd reached the end of his cycle, all starting from a 'worse' position. They didn't even have to invest as much in transfer fees as they (or the club) ended up doing, with properly integrated scouting system and quicker decision making, not making decisions like loading players onto huge contracts who weren't reliable (just for accounting purposes and Woodward's theories specifically). They could have been equally if not more ruthless and had a higher value asset to sell off at this stage.I don't think they're stupid.
Ratcliffe doesn't buy the Glazers out entirely right now but in three years he has the option, or maybe obligation, to buy the remaining Glazer shares.What does this even mean?
Can someone eli5
Couldn't think of anything worse.Ratcliffe doesn't buy the Glazers out entirely right now but in three years he has the option, or maybe obligation, to buy the remaining Glazer shares.
Um no it just doesn't make sense. Maybe you can't read.That's because you are trolling.
It's from a Nice fan.Given the amount of unadulterated rubbish that a lot of United fans come out with on here, it wouldn't shock me to learn that this is untrue or taken out of context.
But even if it was true, I couldn't care less what he does during Nice games.
This thread would be about 1200 pages shorter if we were all to ignore what prospective owners do outside of (potentially) owning United.Given the amount of unadulterated rubbish that a lot of United fans come out with on here, it wouldn't shock me to learn that this is untrue or taken out of context.
But even if it was true, I couldn't care less what he does during Nice games.
Which, again, doesn't make it true, nor give it context.It's from a Nice fan.
What extra context would you like?Which, again, doesn't make it true, nor give it context.
Given the shite you spout, why are you not banned?Given the amount of unadulterated rubbish that a lot of United fans come out with on here, it wouldn't shock me to learn that this is untrue or taken out of context.
But even if it was true, I couldn't care less what he does during Nice games.
Bizarre take.Given the amount of unadulterated rubbish that a lot of United fans come out with on here, it wouldn't shock me to learn that this is untrue or taken out of context.
But even if it was true, I couldn't care less what he does during Nice games.
Because they are literally guessing mate.Most concerning thing about that article for me is the suggestion that they’ll make a decision “some time in May” which suggests it’ll probably be weeks rather than days before we learn anything new
Such a drag
To be fair we are currently in MayMost concerning thing about that article for me is the suggestion that they’ll make a decision “some time in May” which suggests it’ll probably be weeks rather than days before we learn anything new
Such a drag