Giggsyking
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2013
- Messages
- 9,759
Thank you for the information.The Chairman of the bank doesn't own the bank's money
Thank you for the information.The Chairman of the bank doesn't own the bank's money
There won’t be one.When is the 4th round of bidding slated for?
I don't know. Making up stories, sure, but having to come up with crap constantly, begging for clicks, competing with a legion of similarly motivated hacks. Must be hell.Let’s be fair - they all make it up as they go along.
All will be revealed by next week. The media are trying to squeeze more ad revenue out of all of this before the sale.
Journalism must be the easiest job ever, I swear.
Big Jim is no one's fool, he owns the town's only diamond mineHis friends call him Jim, his enemies call him Splinter
Glazers maintaining a 20% equity stake with zero control ≠ being kept onCan you imagine the carnage if he wins and keeps the glazers on
To be fair, there was plenty of speculation that the latest bid would not come in higher, but would rather be structured differently (similar to Ratcliffe's).“Understand that Sheikh Jassim's final offer is again improved from his second bid”
Stating the obvious, I swear journalism must be the easiest job in the world.
Dollars vs. poundsIt’s 7 now?
Pounds
5 billions and 1 cent, just like Arsenal's bid for Suarez.His first offer was reportedly “just below 5bn”, the second was “almost 5bn”, third is “less than 5bn”. The question is - is he raising them by one pound?
Sensationalist cnutIt's 6 billion pounds. Miguel was posting dollars
5 billions and 1 cent, just like Arsenal's bid for Suarez.
You are obsessed with calling people kids.You’re definitely that kid on Twitter who pays for a blue tick.
Glazers maintaining a 20% equity stake with zero control ≠ being kept on
Again, I'm not a Ratcliffe supporter (heavily prefer Qatar), but let's not get things twisted here.
Ratcliffe had tested the top reds loyalty to the limit. His bid include retaining debt, no guarantee of seriously investing in the stadium, a football CV that makes you wonder if Mr Bean would do a better job and now the Glazers being involved. Some still cling to him till this very day
Irrelevant. It's been explained in here ad nauseam.That’s not what is getting mooted though. It’s all about the class B shares which hold the controlling power that they will maintain. The Glazers will still have the final say over all matters at the club despite despite each having less of a stake than the Chelsea season ticket holder.
Ratcliffe would be absolutely stupid if he didn’t try to negotiate those controlling shares with the Glazers and as we already know about those leeches they ain’t going to give up their precious toy that easily.
While he says he is a United fan, he is first and foremost a business man. And a very successful one.
Irrelevant. It's been explained in here ad nauseam.
The share structure will be reorganized with the agreement and INEOS will have effectively complete control.
The Glazers by all accounts don't really give a shit about running the club - they believe there's significant market growth to come which will cause a rise in the club's valuation, and they don't want to leave that money on the table. Having a non-controlling equity share satisfies that interest.
Completely agree. Think they're the only ones who can compete in the long-term with the other state-owned clubs. And if they don't acquire United, chances are they'll go after Liverpool or Spurs, which will just make things even worse for us.Fair enough.
Although the more you read about both bidders, the Qatar one looks much more appealing. Debt free and no Glazer lurking around.
ratcliffe wins
Stay classy.Get fecked Ratcliffe
Irrelevant. It's been explained in here ad nauseam.
The share structure will be reorganized with the agreement and INEOS will have effectively complete control.
The Glazers by all accounts don't really give a shit about running the club - they believe there's significant market growth to come which will cause a rise in the club's valuation, and they don't want to leave that money on the table. Having a non-controlling equity share satisfies that interest.
Stay classy.
That is the classy version. The man is a grade A Cnut.Stay classy.
Underestimates how greedy the Glazers are
Also how can his offer be under £5bn and improved? I thought his last offer was £5bn
Completely agree. Think they're the only ones who can compete in the long-term with the other state-owned clubs. And if they don't acquire United, chances are they'll go after Liverpool or Spurs, which will just make things even worse for us.
If his whole scheme is to show he is a private bidder why would he fly in on a government jet?
So basically they're saying that the qataris are going to bid less than the second round? Yeah can't say I believe thatIf that is in anyway true you can stick a form in the Qatar bid because it’s done. No way the Glazers sell for less than 5
There is no way that Radcliffe pays 4B or so and his shares voting power is gonna be less than Glazer’s. His shares will obviously either gonna be B shares, or all shares will become A shares.Most of the Glazers want to sell so those 20% will probably come from Avram and Joel. That means that it will represent a big chunk of their personal wealth. Now I do believe that SJR will have a big say on how the club will be run. However if you think that Joel/Avram will allow someone with such poor football record to run the show on a business that they still have a big chunk of their wealth tied into then think again. The class B thing is real and while they might have 20% of the shares that 20% will probably have more power then you think. Thus I believe that SJR will be the boss but the Glazers will have ample power on many things.