Rolaholic
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2016
- Messages
- 13,336
Yes, We need to hit them where it hurts. We must stop going to matches, cancel sky/mutv subscriptions, stop buying any kits will be enough as a start.I agree, it's very "look at us, look at what we're doing to solve the Glazers problem"...
... Before going into the stadium with their paid tickets to the Glazers.
'I wholeheartedly endorse this event and/or product'To quote Many Rice Davies: 'He would say that wouldn't he?'
'I wholeheartedly endorse this event and/or product'
I think it's very difficulty to organise protests or make a statement at OT.
There's so many diversity of fans. I go to 2 games a season at least (Ireland). Some seasons could be 4 or 5 games but that hasn't been in a while.
There's been probably 3 games I can recall where there was Anti Glazer protests. Last season there was a walk planned (didn't make it because of travel schedule etc) and they ended up outside the Trinity statue. I am not saying this in any racist way but there must have been 300 Asian fans all with new jerseys on and bags from the megastore. I don't think they had a clue what the chants and banners were when they passed them.
Not just Asians, there's so many people from different countries that going to OT might be a one time thing and they are going to make the most of it, which they have a right too.
I think the protests can get a little lost in the scheme of things because there's such a large scale of fans. Liverpool don't get as many ''tourists''. I may be considered a tourist but I know OT and I love my routine every time I'm there. I've been going for 15 years now with my father and my brother. Nothing like it!
Anyhow, I just explained that since I'm not a season ticket holder and don't want to come across as I am having a go at the ''tourists''.
That's true. As I said I'm in the category of half tourist half not.Irrespective of tourists, we have a lot of fans, each with their own individual perspectives. It’s definitely a diverse landscape.
There are those who love to moan about ‘the execs’, those who love to ‘judge’ our coaching/management, those who will always ’criticise’ the players, those who go on and on about ‘standards’, and that’s before we even get to all the captain hindsights.
They’re all entitled to their perspectives, doesn’t mean they are right or wrong. But that diversity and individuality makes the whole thing interesting.
Conversely, all the ‘fanbase’ generalisations on here are so banal.
He's another pocket sized CB (5ft11). United as a whole had decided for taller defenders who can win a header and won't break next time he goes toe to toe against a typical 6ft3 strikerDisagreement between Ruben Amorim and Omar Berrada saw Man United miss out on Lisandro Martinez’s replacement
https://thepeoplesperson.com/2025/0...out-on-lisandro-martinezs-replacement-291407/
I’m sure if he was pushed on the matter, he would simply cop out with a “we just need more cover and squad depth”. Although he is signalling that we need a lot of improvement, he’s hardly going to say that Onana, Rasmus are shite and need turfing out.Always found it a bit strange when players say they need new signings. They're basically publicly admitting that some of their teammates need replacing because they're not good enough. So they clearly must have some players in mind that aren't good enough. Which is a thought many players will have of course but why make it public that you think that? They should name some names and at least make it interesting!
Well to be honest, kind of like sayin its everybody else and not me. We need new, younger blood on the team, no doubt, but yeah, I think Maguire is one of those that they need to replace. In fact, there are maybe 4-5 starters that they could keep and the rest can be shown the door. The only concern, cannot go through another ETH scenario where he had no idea on what is needed to compete at this level.Always found it a bit strange when players say they need new signings. They're basically publicly admitting that some of their teammates need replacing because they're not good enough. So they clearly must have some players in mind that aren't good enough. Which is a thought many players will have of course but why make it public that you think that? They should name some names and at least make it interesting!
Time to face the facts. We were successful/having relatives success in spite of our ownership model/the manner in which they take dividends whilst investing nothing of their own into the club. Yes, the Glazers may have spent big historically but it was always via funds the club had generated.
We are simply not going to be generating anywhere near the revenue off the pitch to make us competitive for European qualification (UCL or EL) for the foreseeable future.
Simply put, we need to be owned by someone/a group willing to fork out a lot of their own money to get us back to the top and the Glazers/Ineos are categorically not that. Things are going to get a lot worse. Buckle the feck up Utd fans - we are in a whirlwind of trouble.
It's just a crying shame that there's no personal liability on their part. The company can go to the wall but apart from the financial loss, the Glazers won't suffer harm.The reality is that until the Glazers are gone and the debts paid off man united are going nowhere. I actually think the glazers are happy to let the club fall into administration. Nothing is changing not in the summer or 5 years/10 years nothing.
The reality is that until the Glazers are gone and the debts paid off man united are going nowhere. I actually think the glazers are happy to let the club fall into administration. Nothing is changing not in the summer or 5 years/10 years nothing.
Is there anything positive to be said about this club at the moment?
Is there anything positive to be said about this club at the moment?
Time to face the facts. We were successful/having relatives success in spite of our ownership model/the manner in which they take dividends whilst investing nothing of their own into the club. Yes, the Glazers may have spent big historically but it was always via funds the club had generated.
We are simply not going to be generating anywhere near the revenue off the pitch to make us competitive for European qualification (UCL or EL) for the foreseeable future.
Simply put, we need to be owned by someone/a group willing to fork out a lot of their own money to get us back to the top and the Glazers/Ineos are categorically not that. Things are going to get a lot worse. Buckle the feck up Utd fans - we are in a whirlwind of trouble.
We've got some pretty decent youngsters coming through.
I don't think this Summers transfer window was a disaster. DeLigt, Ugarte and Maz are decent purchases. If we made more transfers of that quality then we'll do better. But we can't afford any high value disasters anymore and certainly can't repeat past disaster windows.
I genuinely can't believe there's not more anger amongst fans regarding the ownership right now. Reality is, if a group came in to buy an EPL club in the same way the Glazers came in for us, the rules now in place would not allow it. Everyone knows it's a totally leacherous model. But we are still stuck with our owners under this exact model.
If we weren't such a giant when they came in, we would have fallen so much further under their ownership. Until we get them completely out we will only continue to tumble into obscurity and irrelevance. They have gutted and destroyed everything we built over they best part of 30 years. We were in a worse situation when Fergie came in.
Trouble is there's nobody to cook it.The chicken isn't as bad at Old Trafford
Always found it a bit strange when players say they need new signings. They're basically publicly admitting that some of their teammates need replacing because they're not good enough. So they clearly must have some players in mind that aren't good enough. Which is a thought many players will have of course but why make it public that you think that? They should name some names and at least make it interesting!
You’re going to need 50p to put in the electricity meter too.Trouble is there's nobody to cook it.
That's a typical performance from him tooYou don't even have to name any names man. The stats are there for all to see. Just as an example
£72,000,000 Rasmus Højlund vs Fulham by numbers:
- 0 goals
- 0 assists
- 0 shots on target
- 0% shot accuracy
- 0 successful dribbles
- 0 ground duels won
- 9 touches
- Subbed off
Agree with this other than the idea we will get relegated next season (that will very likely be the promoted teams)We are arguably been run worse than we were a year ago. Results on and off the pitch are dire. We’ve closer to relegation than European qualification. We have a technical director who has achieved nothing at the top level. A CEO who has been found out for making a poor managerial appointment and SJR who is making us a laughing stock.
I don’t see one figure on the pitch, in the dig out or in the boardroom who I can look at and think we might make it through this.
We’re going to be relegated next season and it couldn’t happen to a more deserving club.
The focus was on the financial side of the club and stemming the £1million annual losses. They must have known top 4 was a non-starter so hoped for cup run leaving their new head coach to cope as best he could. The latest round of injuries hasn't helped; especially losing Amad to a training ground injury. We should have got a couple of loanees in for sure, especially with Rashford going to Villa but hindsight is 20/20.Yeh, I'm surprised there's not a lot of anger on the winter window, it was an absolute disaster. To me when they didn't want to bring in any attack loans when our attack got thinner meant they didn't care about the season
Worrying isn't it and its not even his price tag that bothers me. As a forward he can't even do the basics right. All players have off days but the bare minimum needed is the basics. Pass, shoot or try to make things happen. We're essentially playing with 10 men if we have this guy upfront.That's a typical performance from him too
It was a shilling when I was a kid.You’re going to need 50p to put in the electricity meter too.
(Yes that right young people - you used to have to put physical coins into the electric meter and a bloke would come once a month to empty it - that’s how you paid your electricity bill)
INEOS get a free pass and by default so do the glazers. Imagine if this season was entirely on the glazers, everything from job cuts, winter transfer window, and league position. There would be outrage and protest like we’ve never seen.Yeh, I'm surprised there's not a lot of anger on the winter window, it was an absolute disaster. To me when they didn't want to bring in any attack loans when our attack got thinner meant they didn't care about the season
No disrespect to Fulham but if we can't beat them then we've got zero chance of winning the Europa League.Big summer ahead rebuilding the attack. United need to get to the champions league or we will struggle financially
I genuinely can't believe there's not more anger amongst fans regarding the ownership right now. Reality is, if a group came in to buy an EPL club in the same way the Glazers came in for us, the rules now in place would not allow it. Everyone knows it's a totally leacherous model. But we are still stuck with our owners under this exact model.
If we weren't such a giant when they came in, we would have fallen so much further under their ownership. Until we get them completely out we will only continue to tumble into obscurity and irrelevance. They have gutted and destroyed everything we built over they best part of 30 years. We were in a worse situation when Fergie came in.