Club Ownership | INEOS responsible for the football side

Status
Not open for further replies.
Has it ever actually been officially confirmed they do?

You know, the SEC filings usually don't lie as that would be illegal. Or maybe, you know, how every single thing Ineos have done so far suggests that the Glazers have not only relinquished football control, but it seems like Ineos are running the whole show now?
 
They do so why are people lapping up articles of IT and work from home stories?

Wouldn’t that be out of their remit?

That doesn't fit their agenda so they choose to ignore it. Debating whether they're actually in control in June 2024 is honestly something those Twitter users would do that believe Qatar are still going to take over.
 
You know, the SEC filings usually don't lie as that would be illegal. Or maybe, you know, how every single thing Ineos have done so far suggests that the Glazers have not only relinquished football control, but it seems like Ineos are running the whole show now?

Does it actually state on those SEC filings what they will be in control of or just it just state how shares they are purchasing.

I remember around the time this buy-in was announced seeing claims that Football decisions would be made by a 3 man panel which would have be made up of Sir Jim, Sir Dave, and Joel Glazer and the fact that the currently ongoing review is being led by Sir Jim and Joel Glazer is a further indication that the Glazers could still be involved in the Football side.
 
You're arguing that they don't?
I would suggest it’s people who still say the glazers are a problem for things that are clearly turning out to be INEOS dithering/incompetence etc are the ones saying they don’t.

Really can’t have it both ways. Can’t say they are in control of football decisions and then blame the glazers for football matters, other than transfer limitations.
 
Does it actually state on those SEC filings what they will be in control of or just it just state how shares they are purchasing.

I remember around the time this buy-in was announced seeing claims that Football decisions would be made by a 3 man panel which would have be made up of Sir Jim, Sir Dave, and Joel Glazer and the fact that the currently ongoing review is being led by Sir Jim and Joel Glazer is a further indication that the Glazers could still be involved in the Football side.

You realize if that 3 man committee story is true (I don't think it is, but I don't know), then Joel Glazer is outnumbered 2 to 1? So basically that would be proving my point.

And sorry, I'm not gonna go into a 241-page filing to look for the answers to your question. You can surely find them yourself.
 
Last edited:
I would suggest it’s people who still say the glazers are a problem for things that are clearly turning out to be INEOS dithering/incompetence etc are the ones saying they don’t.

Really can’t have it both ways. Can’t say they are in control of football decisions and then blame the glazers for football matters, other than transfer limitations.

What exactly are you talking about? I've not seen any dithering or incompetence from them. If that's your opinion regarding the manager situation and potentially other things, that's okay, although I disagree with you.

I've just listed all the stuff they've they done since December in this thread today. It's a good reminder for posters who are too hang up on the current manager situation.

So what have "indecisive" and "dithering" Ineos done since the acquisition was completed?

-On top of the initial stake, a further 238m was invested into the club as soon as it was possible, which also issued them new shares and every bit of further investment will also very likely keep increasing their stake in the club

-New CEO, Technical Director, CFO, director of comms and public affairs, head physio

-Plans for a new stadium / massively upgrading Old Trafford, plus regenerating the whole surrounding area, probably building a train station as well

-New training ground

They are so obviously making fundamental changes and restructuring the whole club, but their ambition and decisiveness already get questioned by the masses because there's no clarity over the manager's future yet, and it's not like that's probably even the case, to be honest.

They're probably also doing everything they can to stop leaks regularly coming out of the club...and they've done well so far in that area. Every journalist has been left guessing over the manager's future when the decision has likely been made weeks ago.

And I'm reading posts on here that claim they are just as bad or even worse than the Glazers were, without a hint of irony (those posters would deserve the Glazers tbh)...and tweets being linked that claim the Glazers still have the final say in everything when the SEC filing of the deal is publicly available, easily accessible information that dismisses the nonsense those bitter people make up on Twitter that still can't get over the fact that Qatar didn't win.

Do you really think they have to run anything by the Glazers based on this?
 
Giving Jonny Evans a new contract, Southgate to be our new manager, :lol: Bring back Ed, we are sorry Ed.
 
Giving Jonny Evans a new contract, Southgate to be our new manager, :lol: Bring back Ed, we are sorry Ed.

Do you believe everything you read on the internet? I swear I see you constantly pop into threads whining about the most obviously fake stories made up by the likes of Luckhurst and Rob Dawson, simply because they know what gets clicks and riles up the fanbase
 
Giving Jonny Evans a new contract, Southgate to be our new manager, :lol: Bring back Ed, we are sorry Ed.

We're just getting started big boy.

We'll be "giving every player a chance to prove their worth" soon, followed by news that Southgate is "very happy" to have Maguire Martinez as the main centre back combo.
With Lindelof and Evans "having seen it and done it all", and Kwambala in reserve we'll be well stocked.

Plus Southgate is "pleasantly surprised" with how good Antony looks in training, and reckons we'll have some of the best wide options in the league.
Promote some youth team striker as back up to Hojlund and we'll be ready to go without any transfers.

And will make a decent go, pending injuries, of competing for 7th.
 
What exactly are you talking about? I've not seen any dithering or incompetence from them. If that's your opinion regarding the manager situation and potentially other things, that's okay, although I disagree with you.

I've just listed all the stuff they've they done since December in this thread today. It's a good reminder for posters who are too hang up on the current manager situation.



Do you really think they have to run anything by the Glazers based on this?
Yes. They started off well with the appointment of Berrada and few others. But let’s be honest since then a lot of it has just been talk, maybe it will progress to more maybe it won’t and we’ll still be talking about a stadium development or new stadium in 5 years time.

The recent situation with the manager has been and still is incompetence and dithering.

The “strategic review” sounds great but should be done with now and leading to action. It’s not a crime or wrong to call out mistakes as we see them and put pressure on INEOS and hopefully INEOS will learn from any mistakes they make.
 
Yes. They started off well with the appointment of Berrada and few others. But let’s be honest since then a lot of it has just been talk, maybe it will progress to more maybe it won’t and we’ll still be talking about a stadium development or new stadium in 5 years time.

The recent situation with the manager has been and still is incompetence and dithering.

The “strategic review” sounds great but should be done with now and leading to action. It’s not a crime or wrong to call out mistakes as we see them and put pressure on INEOS and hopefully INEOS will learn from any mistakes they make.
feck me - football fans expect real life to happen at the speed of light and at the click of a button.

Ashworth is going to take a while, everything is going to take a while!

Have some patience. Ratcliffe even called for patience when he took over.
 
You realize if that 3 man committee story is true (I don't think it is, but I don't know), then Joel Glazer is outnumbered 2 to 1? So basically that would be proving my point.

And sorry, I'm not gonna go into a 241-page filing to look for the answers to your question. You can surely find them yourself.

If the 3 man committee story is true Joel will be in it representing the familly and im sure they will have been clever enough to have ensured he has some kind of veto agreement in place to protect him from being outvoted 2 to 1 on everything.

I dont know if they have full control or not as I have never seen anything official that includes that info, ive only seen rumours and speculation like the stuff mentioned above.
 
If the 3 man committee story is true Joel will be in it representing the familly and im sure they will have been clever enough to have ensured he has some kind of veto agreement in place to protect him from being outvoted 2 to 1 on everything.

I dont know if they have full control or not as I have never seen anything official that includes that info, ive only seen rumours and speculation like the stuff mentioned above.

Yes. They started off well with the appointment of Berrada and few others. But let’s be honest since then a lot of it has just been talk, maybe it will progress to more maybe it won’t and we’ll still be talking about a stadium development or new stadium in 5 years time.

The recent situation with the manager has been and still is incompetence and dithering.

The “strategic review” sounds great but should be done with now and leading to action. It’s not a crime or wrong to call out mistakes as we see them and put pressure on INEOS and hopefully INEOS will learn from any mistakes they make.

This is just baseless guessing. Nothing's happened so far that indicates that the Glazers have the final say on anything, especially on footballing matters. I'd even go as far as to say everything indicates that the Glazers are already out of the picture and Ineos are running the whole club as if they had a 100% stake. People just expect them to operate around the fans' impatience.
 
This is just baseless guessing. Nothing's happened so far that indicates that the Glazers have the final say on anything, especially on footballing matters. I'd even go as far as to say everything indicates that the Glazers are already out of the picture and Ineos are running the whole club as if they had a 100% stake. People just expect them to operate around the fans' impatience.

It’s not guessing though. The situation with the manager is incompetent. It was leaked that he was getting sacked then they went silent after the FA Cup win. Now we have a manager who clearly doesn’t even know he’s own future because he has said “if they don’t want me I’ll go somewhere else and win trophies”

“Strategic review” is starting to sound like just a catchphrase. Thus far our best CB has gone. People say Varane was injury prone, but he played the most games amongst our CB last season. By itself that’s not bad but will he be replaced with someone equal or better ? Ideally a team that is football focused would have kept Varane signed his long term replacement. That way we have at least 3 CB who are capable of playing a high line. Now we only have Martinez.
 
It’s not guessing though. The situation with the manager is incompetent. It was leaked that he was getting sacked then they went silent after the FA Cup win. Now we have a manager who clearly doesn’t even know he’s own future because he has said “if they don’t want me I’ll go somewhere else and win trophies”

“Strategic review” is starting to sound like just a catchphrase. Thus far our best CB has gone. People say Varane was injury prone, but he played the most games amongst our CB last season. By itself that’s not bad but will he be replaced with someone equal or better ? Ideally a team that is football focused would have kept Varane signed his long term replacement. That way we have at least 3 CB who are capable of playing a high line. Now we only have Martinez.

You don't know what's happening behind the scenes and just making assumptions. The "leak" might not be true, despite coming from the Guardian. Or it might be true but it's not official yet.

Varane gone. Okay. First of all, not our best defender, just our best box defender. There's a big difference. He was in fact injury prone, and not suitable for a possession-based, high line team anyways. 350k/week wages as well. Impressive how everything is incorrect in your assessment of him. Varane and Martínez were one of the deepest defensive lines in the league whenever they played together, in both seasons. Great call to let him go and he will be replaced by a better player. No point in having a 350k/week player on the bench who's only gonna be useful in a handful of games if we switch to a possession-based approach.

You're clearly also both very impatient and frustrated due to not knowing what's happening and you just assume incompetence.
 
You don't know what's happening behind the scenes and just making assumptions. The "leak" might not be true, despite coming from the Guardian. Or it might be true but it's not official yet.

Varane gone. Okay. First of all, not our best defender, just our best box defender. There's a big difference. He was in fact injury prone, and not suitable for a possession-based, high line team anyways. 350k/week wages as well. Impressive how everything is incorrect in your assessment of him. Varane and Martínez were one of the deepest defensive lines in the league whenever they played together, in both seasons. Great call to let him go and he will be replaced by a better player. No point in having a 350k/week player on the bench who's only gonna be useful in a handful of games if we switch to a possession-based approach.

You're clearly also both very impatient and frustrated due to not knowing what's happening and you just assume incompetence.

You say others make “assumptions” I suggest you reread your post and keep reading it until something clicks.
 
We're just getting started big boy.

We'll be "giving every player a chance to prove their worth" soon, followed by news that Southgate is "very happy" to have Maguire Martinez as the main centre back combo.
With Lindelof and Evans "having seen it and done it all", and Kwambala in reserve we'll be well stocked.

Plus Southgate is "pleasantly surprised" with how good Antony looks in training, and reckons we'll have some of the best wide options in the league.
Promote some youth team striker as back up to Hojlund and we'll be ready to go without any transfers.

And will make a decent go, pending injuries, of competing for 7th.

:lol:
 
This is just baseless guessing. Nothing's happened so far that indicates that the Glazers have the final say on anything, especially on footballing matters. I'd even go as far as to say everything indicates that the Glazers are already out of the picture and Ineos are running the whole club as if they had a 100% stake. People just expect them to operate around the fans' impatience.

The title of this thread is baseless guessing though if their has never been anything official to confirm INEOS have full control of the football side
 
This is my problem with INEOS.

The Ten Hag decision should have been made and communicated to all parties by now. Whether they want to keep him or not, right now they are looking like the Glazers, unable to make a decision.

The Glazers kept saying, long term plans etc... gave Jose and Ole a contract and were sacked in a few months. They have had months and months to review Ten Hag, it shouldn't take a week of reviews after the FA cup final to decide this.

I agree; it's certainly not ideal.

I suspect it's all being hampered by the delay in getting people in post, but the season still starts when it starts. FFP makes it critical to make the right decisions on recruitment and not knowing who the coach is going to be makes that a real problem.
 
How do you know whats decided or what isnt?
For all we know TH could have been told already hes staying or going.

If that was the case it seems to me there's no reason not to announce it given the season is over.
 
The handling of his job being what exactly? The only news we’re getting is reporting from the press, which everyone should be taking with a pinch of salt, kicking United when we’re down is the easiest way of getting clicks. We need a new manager in place before the players are due back.

It’s clear that transfers will be happening without a huge input from the manager now, so it’s important that we use this time to make the right decision. If there is no manager available to suit what Ineos are wanting, it’s actually more logical to keep ten hag and wait. Hiring the wrong manager now and firing him next year will lead to a massive payout and more churn.

I also use the term Ineos loosely, because it’s hopefully not even them making these decisions. I would rather another season of ten hag and waiting for the football structure to be in place, than Jim/Brailsford deciding they wants a new manager and Berrada coming in with different ideas in a months time.

It’s actually mad how impatient people are.

How does any manager with a distinct style of play he wants to adopt, have a chance of succeeding with players handed to him when he hasn't had any involvement in recruitment?
 
You know, the SEC filings usually don't lie as that would be illegal. Or maybe, you know, how every single thing Ineos have done so far suggests that the Glazers have not only relinquished football control, but it seems like Ineos are running the whole show now?
Agreed around what you said in your previous post - people are just impatient but Ineos have thus far made a lot of moves, and seemingly the right moves. The others just have an itchy trigger finger re the manager, and some others would like to see squad movement - even though the euros are about to start so things will in all likelihood get delayed as well.

The one thing I’ve seen you mentioned twice now though is the SEC filing - surely as long as the Glazers own a majority share, they will ultimately still make the final calls if they so pleased? The rest are all just internal structures and agreements between shareholders around how they’ll manage the business/divvy up responsibilities etc etc. - but none of those can really circumvent a majority shareholders from “changing” their mind or the structure, if they so wished. I’m not saying this is what’s happening or will happen - that’s my understanding of company law anyway. And it’s very clear by the looks of everything which has happened so far, that Ineos is intact, in charge of all footballing matters.
 
I don't want to talk too soon, but I think they're maybe edging towards what I was hoping they'd do. I'm going to wait and see what happens next. I suspect that sudden availability of other managers has forced them to rethink who they want to hire.

In one of tonight's article, there was a line that convinced me that they're briefing media and it's given the first insight into what they're looking for. Something about expecting a large squad turnover and wanting a coach that can get the most out of players. And these two coaches have proven that they can do that. Let's see.
 
Only been here a few months and already I'm begging to despise INEOS more each day.

Not any positivity from them. Its just negativity and more negativity.

Sponging funds for a new stadium, stripping down assets at the club.

Cutting staff and tearing out the heart of the club with the family values Sir Alex used to swear by.

To the absolutely shameful treatment of Ten Hag.
 
Only been here a few months and already I'm begging to despise INEOS more each day.

Not any positivity from them. Its just negativity and more negativity.

Sponging funds for a new stadium, stripping down assets at the club.

Cutting staff and tearing out the heart of the club with the family values Sir Alex used to swear by.

To the absolutely shameful treatment of Ten Hag.
Don’t think they’re after any external funds for the stadium? Just the surrounding area (which is fair)
 
This is a mess. Whatever hope i had with new “management team” is gone now. This process is as unprofessional as it can be. Sack ETH if you are looking at new options.
This could have been avoided if they just backed him and not leaked that they are doing a review and decision is not yet made. Do the review in background and just do lip service backing for ETH.
 
I'd be worried if this was all happening with Barreda and Ashworth in their roles. They aren't, so I'm not. We're still very much in a transition period.
 
I'd be worried if this was all happening with Barreda and Ashworth in their roles. They aren't, so I'm not. We're still very much in a transition period.

The fact we are still arguing with Newcastle over Dan Ashworth 4 and a half months after we started negotiations is worrying on its self.
 
I'd be worried if this was all happening with Barreda and Ashworth in their roles. They aren't, so I'm not. We're still very much in a transition period.

There's no way they're not involved, even if they're not officially in post yet. We have maybe some proof already that they're working behind the scenes, with the whole email thing between them both whilst still in post at City and Newcastle.
 
At the moment INEOS seem to be acting like aggressive, amateurish dickheads.

I really hope Berrada sorts shit out when he comes in because SJR and his lackey Brailsford should be nowhere near footballing decisions is this is how they conduct business.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.