Club Ownership | INEOS responsible for the football side

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not really sure you can blame Ineos for this. Seemingly made excellent front and back office changes, just delivered our best window in years and have massively lowered the ballooning wage bill. The only reason I'm not more depressed about the current situation is that it's no longer the Glazers in charge.

New manager by January, and they brought in a perfect caretaker, and have him already sat in the right place.

All kinda smart imo.
 
I don't believe Ten Hag deserved a "clean slate" under a new regime, and they had the perfect excuse to get rid of him and want their own man in as he'd been shite. It was a questionable decision, and thus far it is looking like the wrong one.
 
Ineos need to pull the trigger now. It's catastrophic already. We have sink so low that finishing 8th is acceptable.

ETH can only coach passing around GK and defenders. Even that, whenever team pressed high we look uncomfortable. Onana took forever to kick a simple pass.

Nothing else, no defence shape, opponent can run through our midfield with ease and our attack was comical slow and predictable.
 
With all the cost cutting they've given themselves a big problem with Ten Hag's extension. More millions that they will want to avoid paying out.

Probably the biggest reason he's still here is that it was the cheap option to keep him.
 
They failed not sacking him during the summer. It was obvious he wasn't good enough.

They have the opportunity to right the wrong during the break. Delaying the decision is only delaying the inevitable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.